Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Mary Apple Boyer Family Foundation

Its FY2021 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$43k
Granted FY2021
22
Grants FY2021
4
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172021.

Arts & Culture$125kReligion$44kEnvironment$19kEducation$9kHuman Services$7kRecreation & Sports$7kHealth$7kFood & Nutrition$2kOther$0
02FY2021 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k21 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
$500
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WINNETKA CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH$11,550
RAVINIA FESTIVAL$9,600
CHICAGO HUMANITIES FESTIVAL$5,500
CHICAGO HUMANITIES FESTIVAL$3,000
WRITERS THEATRE$2,500
NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY$2,000
CHICAGO BOTANICAL GARDEN$1,500
JOURNEY CARE FOUNDATION$1,000
THE BOULEVARD (INTERFAITH HOUSE)$1,000
CHICAGO CHILDRENS MUSEUM$1,000
SARASOTA OPERA$500
GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY$500
SKOKIE COUNTRY CLUB EDUCATION FOUNDATION$500
NORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER$500
EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 79% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MARKLUND: $750 → 8%MARKLUND: $500 → 8%MARKLUND: $500 → 8%NORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER: $4k → 14%NORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER: $1k → 14%NORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER: $1k → 14%NORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER: $500 → 14%NORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$204k · 23 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.

23 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2021, 7 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
4

Total granted

$204k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+1%

Still filing today

48%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationEnvironmentRecreation & SportsReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WT
    Writers Theatre Inc
    5× · 2017–2021 · $24k · revenue +8%
  • CH
    CHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY
    5× · 2017–2021 · $19k · revenue +37%
  • CC
    Chicago Children's Museum
    5× · 2017–2021 · $15k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO DIVINITY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • RF
    RAVINIA FESTIVAL WOMENS BOARD
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • TL
    THE LINCOLN ACADEMY OF ILLINOIS
    one grant, 2017 · $600 · revenue +1%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Music and Dance Theater Chicago Inc
Arts & Culture
2
Lyric Opera of Chicago

We believe in the life-changing, transformational, revelatory power of great art and opera. Lyric Opera of Chicago exists to provide a broad, deep, and relevant cultural service to the Chicago region and the nation, and to advance the…

Arts & Culture
3
Chicago Opera Theater

Chicago opera theater expands the tradition of opera as a living art form by engaging lovers of music and storytelling through innovative experiences, predominantly of new and rarely performed works.

Arts & Culture
4
The Chicago High School for the Arts

The chicago high school for the arts (chiarts) develops the next generation of diverse, artistically promising scholar-artists through intensive pre-professional training in the arts, combined with a comprehensive college preparatory…

Education
5
Chicago Theatre Group Inc

The chicago theatre group is committed to producing both classic and contemporary works giving full voice to a wide range of artists and visions. by dedicating itself to three guiding principles - quality, equity, and community - the…

Arts & Culture
6
Auditorium Theatre of Roosevelt University Inc

The Auditorium Theatre of Roosevelt University ("The Auditorium"), an Illinois not-for-profit corporation, is committed to presenting the finest in international, cultural, community and educational programming to Chicago and to the…

Arts & Culture
7
Music Institute of Chicago

The music institute of chicago ("music institute") leads people toward a lifelong engagement with music, by providing widely accessible resources for high quality music teaching, performing, and service activities.

Arts & Culture
8
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
9
Chicago Historical Society

The Chicago History Museum strives to be a destination for learning, inspiration, and civic engagement. Through dynamic exhibitions, tours, programs, digital resources, and special events, the Museum connects people to Chicago's history…

Arts & Culture
10
Lake Forest College

Provide post-secondary education leading to a baccalaureate degree. Program service expenditures are made in conjunction with the operation of a liberal arts college spread over 107 acres with approximately 63 educational and support…

Education
11
Cedille Chicago Nfp

Cedille Chicago, NFP is devoted to the activity of producing and marketing recordings of classical music by Chicago-area musicians and composers.

Arts & Culture
12
Illinois College

Illinois college is a co-educational institution of higher education learning providing a four-year educational program leading to the baccalaureate degree. illinois college is a community committed to the highest standards of scholarship…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chicago Horticultural Society and the most unlike its peers is Court Theatre Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
14/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Chicago Humanities Festival — $40,195 · Arts & CultureChicago Humanities FestivalWriters Theatre Inc — $23,500 · Arts & CultureWriters Theatre IncChicago Children's Museum — $14,500 · Arts & CultureChicago Children's MuseumRAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION — $9,600 · Arts & CultureRAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION+3 more — $3,150 · Arts & CultureWINNETKA CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH — $33,650 · OtherWINNETKA CONGREGATIONAL CHURCHRAVINIA — $28,600 · OtherRAVINIATHE BOULEVARD (INTERFAITH HOUSE) — $8,000 · OtherTHE BOULEVARD (INTERFAITH HOUSE)PLANNED PARENTHOOD — $4,000 · Other+14 more — $16,017 · Other+14 moreCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY — $19,250 · EnvironmentCHICAGO H…NORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER — $6,750 · Human ServicesMARKLUND CHILDRENS HOME — $1,750 · Human ServicesNorthwestern University — $6,000 · Recreation & SportsNORTH LAWNDALE COLLEGE PREPARATORY CHARTER HIGH SCHOOL INC — $2,500 · EducationTHE LINCOLN ACADEMY OF ILLINOIS — $600 · EducationGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY — $1,500 · Food & Nutrition
Arts & Culture$90,945Other$90,267Environment$19,250Human Services$8,500Recreation & Sports$6,000Education$3,100Food & Nutrition$1,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetChicago Humanities Festival — $40,195 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetWriters Theatre Inc — $23,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY — $19,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetChicago Children's Museum — $14,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetRAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION — $9,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER — $6,750 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNorthwestern University — $6,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSarasota Opera Association Inc — $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH LAWNDALE COLLEGE PREPARATORY CHARTER HIGH SCHOOL INC — $2,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMARKLUND CHILDRENS HOME — $1,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Hap Foundation Inc (F/K/A Journeycare Foundation) — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTART EARLY — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LINCOLN ACADEMY OF ILLINOIS — $600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $447 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Metropolitan Opera Guild Inc — $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Chicago Humanities Festival
  • Who funds Writers Theatre Inc
  • Who funds CHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds Chicago Children's Museum
  • Who funds RAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds NORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER
  • Who funds Northwestern University
  • Who funds Sarasota Opera Association Inc
  • Who funds NORTH LAWNDALE COLLEGE PREPARATORY CHARTER HIGH SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds MARKLUND CHILDRENS HOME
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY
  • Who funds The Hap Foundation Inc (F/K/A Journeycare Foundation)
  • Who funds START EARLY
  • Who funds THE LINCOLN ACADEMY OF ILLINOIS
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF
  • Who funds The Metropolitan Opera Guild Inc
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL17.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Mary Apple Boyer Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph