Skip to content
Martha Sue Parr Trust Xxxxx6005 at a glance

· Private foundation

Martha Sue Parr Trust Xxxxx6005

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.4M
Granted FY2026still arriving
16
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$325k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Human Services$3.0MHealth$2.4MArts & Culture$1.4MEducation$847kReligion$395kYouth Development$348kHousing & Shelter$255kRecreation & Sports$250kOther$0
02FY2026 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • $10k–50k9 grants · $235k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $525k
  • $250k+2 grants · $625k
$45,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$26M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CUMBERLAND YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES$325,000
BAYLOR SCOTT AND WHITE ALL SAINTS$300,000
TEXAS HEALTH RESOURCES$200,000
PROJECTHANDUP AKA THE GATEHOUSE$100,000
FORT WORTH MUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND HISTORY$100,000
CRISTO REY FORT WORTH CATHOLIC HIGH SCHO$75,000
NATIONAL MEDAL OF HONOR MUSEUM FOUNDATIO$50,000
FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES$45,000
CAMP FIRE FIRST TEXAS$35,000
LENA POPE HOME INC$30,000
BRITE DIVINITY SCHOOL$30,000
GLADNEY CENTER FOR ADOPTION$25,000
HOPE FARM INC$20,000
LEADERSHIP FORT WORTH$20,000
ARLINGTON URBAN MINISTRIES$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–26, $3.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 20% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CUMBERLAND PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOME: $500k → 8%CUMBERLAND PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOME: $416k → 8%GLADNEY CENTER FOR ADOPTION: $25k → 11%CUMBERLAND PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOME: $350k → 8%GLADNEY CENTER FOR ADOPTION: $25k → 11%CUMBERLAND YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES: $325k → 8%CUMBERLAND PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOME: $300k → 8%CUMBERLAND PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOME: $300k → 8%GLADNEY CENTER FOR ADOPTION: $25k → 11%CUMBERLAND PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOME: $240k → 8%Gladney Center for Adoption: $25k → 11%CUMBERLAND PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOME: $225k → 8%Gladney Center for Adoption: $25k → 11%GLADNEY CENTER FOR ADOPTION: $25k → 11%GLADNEY CENTER FOR ADOPTION: $20k → 11%UNITED COMMUNITY CENTERS INC: $30k → 11%UNITED COMMUNITY CENTERS INC: $25k → 11%HOPE FARM INC: $25k → 11%HOPE FARM INC: $25k → 11%Hope Farm Inc: $25k → 11%Hope Farm Inc: $20k → 11%HOPE FARM INC: $20k → 11%MISSION CENTRAL METROPLEX INC: $20k → 11%HOPE FARM INC: $15k → 11%MISSION CENTRAL METROPLEX INC: $16k → 11%PROJECT 4031: $5k → 11%Cornerstone Assistance Network: $25k → 11%LENA POPE HOME INC: $50k → 11%LENA POPE HOME INC: $50k → 11%LENA POPE HOME INC: $35k → 11%LENA POPE HOME INC: $30k → 11%LENA POPE HOME INC: $30k → 11%Community Hospice of Texas: $25k → 11%LENA POPE HOME INC: $25k → 11%Community Hospice of Texas: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.9M · 32 repeat orgs$1.5M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +11% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

32 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2026, 18 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
21

Total granted

$8.9M
$1.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
0%

Still filing today

88%
90%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $350k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
Human ServicesEducationHealthArts & CultureHousing & ShelterReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CY
    CUMBERLAND YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES
    8× · 2018–2026 · $2.7M · revenue +106%
  • AS
    All Saints Health Foundation
    6× · 2018–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +26%
  • FW
    FORT WORTH MUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND HISTORY
    5× · 2021–2026 · $925k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • TA
    TEXAS ACADEMY OF FAITH & ARTS
    one grant, 2018 · $350k · revenue -166%
  • CM
    Children Medical Center Foundation
    one grant, 2020 · $350k
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF TARRANT COUNTY
    one grant, 2025 · $75k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Trinity Charter School

The trinity charter schools system has 11 campuses in texas. all 11 campuses work with youth who have emotional difficulties, and need active engagement in planning and guiding their own academic careers through student led credit…

Education
2
Fort Worth Academy for the Education of Children and Youth

Education of children and youth

Education
3
The Woodlands Christian Academy

TWCA is an independent, Christ-centered college preparatory school that integrates learning with biblical faith and challenges our students to reach their highest potential - intellectually, creatively, physically, and socially - for the…

—
4
Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital Fort Worth

A faith-based organization whose mission is to improve the health of the people in the communities it serves regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
5
Central Texas Community Health Centers

Communitycare operates 25 health center locations offering comprehensive primary care services for the entire family including pediatrics, behavioral health services, and dental care.

Health
6
Leadership Austin

Leadership austin connects and develops leaders to courageously engage and transform our communities.

Youth Development
7
Colleyville Covenant Christian

The mission is to provide a biblically based classical college preparatory education that inspires a passion for excellence a heart of grace and the character of Christ.

Education
8
His Story Coaching and Counseling

Christian coaching, counseling, assessment and consulting services to the communities of Tarrant County, Texas.

Human Services
9
Austin Trinity School

Trinity episcopal school (trinity) is a not-for-profit independent school whose mission is to provide an enriched academic curriculum in a christian environment. trinity is not affiliated with or sponsored by any parish. we will nurture…

Education
10
Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council

The mission of the Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council is to drive evidence-based improvement in patient care and health equity throughout the region.

—
11
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
12
Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Family Planning and Preventative Health

Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Family Planning and Preventative Health provides comprehensive and complementary health care services in settings that preserve and protect the essential privacy and rights of the individual, advocates…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ach Child and Family Services; the most unlike its peers is The Art Station. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

48 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 48 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
48/48
Grantees still filing
26/48
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CUMBERLAND YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES: $2,656,000 · Human ServicesCUMBERLAND YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICESLENA POPE HOME INC: $220,000 · Human ServicesLENA POPE HOME INCTHE GLADNEY CENTER FOR ADOPTION: $170,000 · Human ServicesHOPE FARM INC: $130,000 · Human Services+5 more: $156,000 · Human ServicesAll Saints Health Foundation: $1,255,000 · HealthAll Saints Health Foun…Texas Health Resources: $430,000 · HealthTexas Health ResourcesMISSION TRAVIS MERCY: $300,000 · HealthMISSION TRAVIS MERCY+4 more: $132,000 · Health+4 moreCRISTO REY FORT WORTH CATHOLIC HIGH SCHO: $421,000 · OtherCRISTO REY FORT WORTH CA…Children Medical Center Foundation: $350,000 · OtherChildren Medical Center …BAYLOR SCOTT AND WHITE ALL SAINTS: $300,000 · OtherBAYLOR SCOTT AND WHITE A…FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $270,000 · OtherFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN …PROJECT HANDUP: $200,000 · OtherPROJECT HANDUPThe YouthVantage Alliance: $100,000 · OtherLeadership Fort Worth: $130,000 · OtherLeadership Fort WorthCAMP FIRE FIRST TEXAS: $105,000 · Other+13 more: $399,500 · Other+13 moreFORT WORTH MUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND HISTORY: $925,000 · Arts & CultureFORT WORTH M…YOUTH ORCHESTRA OF GREATER FORT WORTH: $135,000 · Arts & CultureYOUTH ORCHES…Artist Outreach Inc: $85,000 · Arts & CultureArtist Outre…NATIONAL MEDAL OF HONOR MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Arts & CultureTEXAS ACADEMY OF FAITH & ARTS: $350,000 · EducationTEXAS ACA…BRITE DIVINITY SCHOOL: $195,500 · EducationBRITE DIV…TRINITY VALLEY SCHOOL: $100,000 · EducationTRINITY V…TEXAS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $60,000 · EducationTEXAS WES…Teach for America Inc: $60,000 · EducationTeach for…KINDERPLATZ OF FINE ARTS INC: $50,000 · EducationKINDERPLA…HARVEST CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC: $40,000 · Education+2 more: $40,000 · EducationRIVERBEND RETREAT CENTER: $300,000 · ReligionArlington Urban Ministries: $110,000 · ReligionPROJECTHANDUP: $200,000 · Housing & ShelterARLINGTON LIFE SHELTER: $40,000 · Housing & ShelterCHRISTIAN COMMUNITY ACTION: $15,000 · Housing & Shelter
Human Services$3,332,000Health$2,117,000Other$2,275,500Arts & Culture$1,195,000Education$895,500Religion$410,000Housing & Shelter$255,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCUMBERLAND YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES: $2,656,000 over 8y, 19% of budgetAll Saints Health Foundation: $1,255,000 over 6y, 3.1% of budgetFORT WORTH MUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND HISTORY: $925,000 over 5y, 3.7% of budgetTexas Health Resources: $430,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMISSION TRAVIS MERCY: $300,000 over 2y, 33% of budgetRIVERBEND RETREAT CENTER: $300,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetLENA POPE HOME INC: $220,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetBRITE DIVINITY SCHOOL: $195,500 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetTHE GLADNEY CENTER FOR ADOPTION: $170,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetYOUTH ORCHESTRA OF GREATER FORT WORTH: $135,000 over 6y, 5.6% of budgetHOPE FARM INC: $130,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetLeadership Fort Worth: $130,000 over 4y, 9.1% of budgetArlington Urban Ministries: $110,000 over 6y, 3.0% of budgetCAMP FIRE FIRST TEXAS: $105,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetThe YouthVantage Alliance: $100,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetTRINITY VALLEY SCHOOL: $100,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetArtist Outreach Inc: $85,000 over 5y, 3.9% of budgetUNITED WAY OF TARRANT COUNTY: $75,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUnion Gospel Mission of Tarrant County: $75,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTEXAS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $60,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTeach for America Inc: $60,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED COMMUNITY CENTERS INC: $55,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetFORGET ME NOT FRANCES: $52,000 over 2y, 23% of budgetKINDERPLATZ OF FINE ARTS INC: $50,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetARLINGTON PREGNANCY CENTER INC: $50,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetHARVEST CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC: $40,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetARLINGTON LIFE SHELTER: $40,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetKIDS WHO CARE INC: $37,500 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetMission Central Metroplex Inc: $36,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetCommunity Healthcare of Texas: $35,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPregnancy Lifeline: $25,000 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetDAY RESOURCE CENTER FOR HOMELESS: $25,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetFORT WORTH CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER: $25,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetKIDLINKS: $25,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetFORT WORTH CHRISTAIN SCHOOL INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE BEN HOGAN FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetCORNERSTONE ASSISTANCE NETWORK INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetChrist's Haven for Children Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetACH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA WISH WITH WINGS INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCHRISTIAN COMMUNITY ACTION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGILL CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $15,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetForward Training Center of Hood County: $12,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetTHE ART STATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPROJECT 4031 INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …Communities Foundatio…Thomas M Helen McKee …Amon G Carter Foundat…Sid W Richardson Foun…Bnsf Railway Foundati…Paul E Andrews Jr Fou…Ken W Davis FoundationUnited Way of Tarrant…Textron Charitable Tr…The Roach Foundation …Fort Worth Colonial C…
Community Foundation of North Texas (TaxTX56.3× affinity28 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Thomas M Helen McKee & John P Ryan Fo John P Ryan Foundation Inc · Amon G Carter Foundation · Sid W Richardson Foundation · Bnsf Railway Foundation · Paul E Andrews Jr Foundation · Ken W Davis Foundation · United Way of Tarrant County · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · The Roach Foundation Inc · Fort Worth Colonial Charities Inc (Fka Bfc Colonial Inc)

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Martha Sue Parr Trust Xxxxx6005 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Martha Sue Parr Trust Xxxxx6005. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Martha Sue Parr Trust Xxxxx6005’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home