Skip to content
Marshfield Area Community Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Community foundation

Marshfield Area Community Foundation Inc

Connecting people who care with causes that matter.

$1.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
25
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$544k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$8.0MPublic Benefit$2.9MHealth$972kHousing & Shelter$442kPhilanthropy$388kAnimals$361kHuman Services$223kReligion$181kOther$0
02FY2024 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 25 grants below total $1,118,015, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,456,153 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $338,138 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $67k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $210k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $297k
  • $250k+1 grant · $544k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$19M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$543,584
SCHOOL DISTRICT OF MARSHFIELD$127,722
CITY OF MARSHFIELD$103,816
CITY OF MARSHFIELD$65,556
MARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION$39,500
MARSHFIELD AREA UNITED WAY$36,731
MARSHFIELD HIGH SCHOOL$25,256
LUCILLE TACK CENTER FOR THE ARTS$15,500
MARSHFIELD AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC$15,064
ANGELO LUPPINO INC$15,000
MARSHFIELD TIGER HOCKEY BLUELINE CLUB$12,000
COLUMBUS CATHOLIC SCHOOL$10,966
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
AUBURNDALE PARK ASSOCIATION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $124k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%MARSHFIELD AREA RESPITE CARE CENTER: $25k → 11%COMPANION DAY SERVICES: $20k → 11%CHILD CARE CENTERS OF MARSHFIELD INC: $20k → 11%CHILD CARE CENTERS OF MARSHFIELD INC: $16k → 11%COMPANION DAY SERVICES: $16k → 11%PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $12k → 11%SOUP OR SOCKS: $10k → 11%COMPANION DAY SERVICES: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$16M · 30 repeat orgs$1.5M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +30% since the first grant, against -4% for those funded once.

30 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
28

Total granted

$16M
$1.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
-4%

Still filing today

43%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $120k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementEmploymentPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MA
    MARSHFIELD AREA PET SHELTER INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $341k · revenue +93%
  • MA
    MARSHFIELD AREA UNITED WAY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $254k · revenue +12%
  • MA
    MARSHFIELD AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $124k · revenue +93% · 28% of their budget

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $956k
  • FF
    FOREVER FUND
    one grant, 2021 · $70k
  • SC
    SCHERRER CONSTRUCTION CO INC
    one grant, 2020 · $56k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Marshfield Area Community Foundation Inc

Connecting people who care with causes that matter.

Philanthropy
2
Marshfield Senior Center

At our senior center, our goal is to help seniors live vibrant, fulfilling lives. We aim to create a warm, welcoming place where seniors can connect, learn, and stay active. We also understand that not everyone can make it to the center,…

—
3
Marshfield Area Chamber Foundation Inc

Promote economic development and full employment in the marshfield area by supporting and improving general education, vocational training, city planning, and leadership development.

Philanthropy
4
Marshfield Medical Center Credit Union

To offer our members quality financial services, competitive rates, and encourage responsible money management practices.

—
5
Madison Area Rehabilitation Centers Inc

Marc, inc. advocates for the full inclusion of all individuals with disabilities in the life of their community. we do so by fostering opportunities for individuals with disabilities to develop a sense of self-worth and dignity, while…

—
6
Marshall County Nonprofit Partnership Foundation
—
7
Marshall County Life Center Inc

To hold title to and manage real and to a limited extent personal property of the marshall county economic development corporation.

Community Improvement
8
Marshfield Food Pantry Inc

Supplementing marshfield familiies nutritional needs

Food & Nutrition
9
Dickinson Hospitals Foundation

To solicit, receive and expend funds to improve medical and hospital care facilities, services and programs at marshfield medical clinic-dickinson

—
10
Marc Foundation of Dane County Inc

Marc foundation of dane county has provided financial support to programs of madison area rehabilitation centers, inc (dba marc, inc.). the primary support has been through building leases and improvements to marc and to support their…

—
11
Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of Marshfield Inc

Ronald mcdonald house charities (rmhc) mission is to keep families with sick children together and near the care and resourses they need. rmhc of marshfield is dedicated to easing the burden of families whose lives have been disrupted as a…

Health
12
Marinette County Committee on Aging Inc

Our mission at Marinette County Elderly Services is to assist older persons in maintaining a longer, healthier, and more fulfilled life.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Marshfield Area Ymca Inc; the most unlike its peers is Lucille Tack Center for the Arts. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
13/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SCHOOL DISTRICT OF MARSHFIELD: $7,722,031 · OtherSCHOOL DISTRICT OF MARSHFIELDIndividual grant recipient: $2,981,558 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCITY OF MARSHFIELD: $2,840,333 · OtherCITY OF MARSHFIELDIndividual grant recipient: $956,369 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+51 more: $1,685,964 · Other+51 moreMARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC: $716,569 · Health+2 more: $36,000 · HealthMARSHFIELD AREA PET SHELTER INC: $341,082 · AnimalsMARSHFIELD AREA UNITED WAY: $254,014 · PhilanthropyMADISON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $31,075 · Philanthropy+1 more: $5,000 · PhilanthropyCOMPANION DAY SERVICES INC: $40,924 · Human ServicesCHILD CARE CENTERS OF MARSHFIELD INC: $36,000 · Human ServicesMARSHFIELD AREA RESPITE CARE CENTER INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesPERSONAL DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $12,091 · Human ServicesSOUP OR SOCKS INC: $10,400 · Human ServicesOPPORTUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC: $122,248 · EmploymentAMERICAN LEGION POST 54 LESSELYONG-SADOWSKA-KESLER-MARTIN: $64,168 · Public Benefit
Other$16,186,255Health$752,569Animals$341,082Philanthropy$290,089Human Services$124,415Employment$122,248Public Benefit$64,168

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC: $716,569 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetMARSHFIELD AREA PET SHELTER INC: $341,082 over 6y, 7.3% of budgetMARSHFIELD AREA UNITED WAY: $254,014 over 8y, 4.1% of budgetMARSHFIELD AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $124,328 over 8y, 28% of budgetOPPORTUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC: $122,248 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetMARSHFIELD AREA YMCA INC: $66,173 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetAMERICAN LEGION POST 54 LESSELYONG-SADOWSKA-KESLER-MARTIN: $64,168 over 5y, 17% of budgetCHIPPEWA VALLEY TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $57,269 over 2y, 7.4% of budgetCOMPANION DAY SERVICES INC: $40,924 over 3y, 11% of budgetCHILD CARE CENTERS OF MARSHFIELD INC: $36,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetMAIN STREET MARSHFIELD INC: $33,658 over 5y, 4.3% of budgetMADISON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $31,075 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMARSHFIELD ROTARY FOUNDATION INC: $27,100 over 3y, 15% of budgetMARSHFIELD CLINIC INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARSHFIELD AREA RESPITE CARE CENTER INC: $25,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetNORTH CENTRAL COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INC: $22,476 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLUCILLE TACK CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $15,500 over 1y, 9.2% of budgetPERSONAL DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $12,091 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetKathy's House Inc: $11,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSOUP OR SOCKS INC: $10,400 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetHANNAH CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetMARSHFIELD AREA COALITION FOR YOUTH INC: $8,318 over 1y, 98% of budgetUNITED WAY OF MARATHON COUNTY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MARSHFIELD AREA PET SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MARSHFIELD AREA UNITED WAY ↗
  • Who funds MARSHFIELD AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds OPPORTUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds MARSHFIELD AREA YMCA INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN LEGION POST 54 LESSELYONG-SADOWSKA-KESLER-MARTIN ↗
  • Who funds CHIPPEWA VALLEY TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds COMPANION DAY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILD CARE CENTERS OF MARSHFIELD INC ↗
  • Who funds MAIN STREET MARSHFIELD INC ↗
  • Who funds MADISON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MARSHFIELD ROTARY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MARSHFIELD CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds MARSHFIELD AREA RESPITE CARE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH CENTRAL COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds LUCILLE TACK CENTER FOR THE ARTS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Umhoefer Foundation I…Nelson-Jameson Founda…Green Bay Packers Fou…Weber Charitable Foun…Marshfield Area Unite…Herbert H Kohl Charit…Marshfield Clinic Hea…Greater Green Bay Com…Hamilton Roddis Found…Community Foundation …Otto Bremer TrustXcel Energy Foundation
Umhoefer Foundation IncWI26.4× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Umhoefer Foundation Inc · Nelson-Jameson Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Weber Charitable Foundation · Marshfield Area United Way · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Marshfield Clinic Health System Inc · Greater Green Bay Community Foundation Inc · Hamilton Roddis Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of North Central Wisconsin Inc · Otto Bremer Trust · Xcel Energy Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Marshfield Area Community Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Marshfield Area Community Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 69 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Marshfield Area’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home