Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Marks-Hofheimer Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$24k
Granted FY2024still arriving
33
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$3k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

98% of Marks-Hofheimer Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Schwab Charitable Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 7 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2024, the last year Marks-Hofheimer Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 18 organizations, $24k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

15
20
23
21
13
22
17
23
18
24
7
25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Philanthropy$573kHealth$24kHuman Services$18kArts & Culture$16kHousing & Shelter$12kEducation$5kPublic Safety & Disaster$4kReligion$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 33 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$500
Median grant
5
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$2,970
JCFR$2,200
PETER PAUL DEVELOPMENT CENTER$2,000
COMFORT ZONE CAMP$1,700
VA SUPPORTIVE HOUSING$1,500
VIRGINIA MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS$1,300
LEWIS GINTER BOTANICAL GARDEN$1,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS$1,000
KIRVA HOSPICE$1,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES$1,000
MAKE A WISH GREATER VIRGINIA$1,000
COLLEGIATE SCHOOL$1,000
CANCERLINC$600
SCIENCE MUSEUM OF VIRGINIA$600
OSHER LIFELONG LEARNING INSTITUTE$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 31% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%RIP MEDICAL DEBT: $250 → 9%CORNER TO CORNER: $100 → 14%AFU 669 AMERICAN FRIENDS OF UNIT 669: $100 → 16%COMFORT ZONE CAMP: $2k → 9%COMFORT ZONE CAMP: $1k → 9%COMFORT ZONE CAMP: $1k → 9%COMFORT ZONE CAMP: $1k → 9%CIRCLE CENTER ADULT DAY SERVICES: $50 → 9%KIRVA HOSPICE: $1k → 9%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 22%KIRVA HOSPICE: $1k → 9%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 22%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 22%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $800 → 22%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $750 → 22%PETER PAUL DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $2k → 9%WEINSTEIN JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $100 → 22%PETER PAUL DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $1k → 9%PETER PAUL DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $1k → 9%PETER PAUL DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $1k → 9%BEYOND BOUNDARIES: $500 → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
IL
NY
MA
IA
PA
NJ
NE
VA
MD
DE
TN
NC
SC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$92k · 27 repeat orgs$19k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +14% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.

27 repeat relationships — 22 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call). Read against FY2024, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
30

Total granted

$92k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+9%

Still filing today

56%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthArts & CulturePhilanthropyEducationEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MF
    MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF GREATER VIRGINIA
    6× · 2020–2025 · $11k · revenue +43%
  • CZ
    COMFORT ZONE CAMP INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $5k · revenue +116%
  • JF
    Jewish Family Services Inc
    5× · 2020–2024 · $5k · revenue +62%

Funded once

  • CB
    CONGREGATION BETH AHABAH
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • JA
    JCFR ANNUAL FOR UKRAINE - COMMUNITY FEDERALTION OF RICHMOND
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
  • VM
    VA MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS
    one grant, 2020 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Edward Via Virginia College of Osteopathic Medicine

The mission of the edward via college of osteopathic medicine (vcom) is to prepare globally-minded, community-focused physicians to meet the needs of rural and medically underserved populations and promote research to improve human health.

Education
2
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
3
Uva Community Health Inc

Our mission: transforming health and inspiring hope for all virginians and beyond. our vision: to be the nation's leading public academic health system and a best place to work - while transforming patient care, research, education, and…

Health
4
Sentara Rmh Medical Center

As part of sentara health's integrated health care system, we improve health every day.

Health
5
Sentara Health

We improve health every day through coordinating, promoting and planning for the provision of health services and the promotion of health, medical education, and the social, cultural, educational, and economic development of the community.

Health
6
Martha Jefferson Hospital

As part of sentara health's integrated delivery system, we improve health every day.

Health
7
Vcu Investment Management Company

To provide investment and investment management and related services to the rector and the board of visitors of virginia commonwealth university (vcu), and/or to the private and independent foundations and other entities affiliated with…

Education
8
Carilion Medical Center

Our mission is to improve the health of the communities we serve through our commitment to a common purpose of better patient care, better community health, and lower cost.

Health
9
Sentara Medical Group

See schedule o.as part of sentara health's integrated health care system, we improve health every day through the establishment and operation of programs and services for the provision of health care and for health related purposes; the…

Health
10
Virginia Commonwealth University Intellectual Property Foundation

The foundation determines the patentability and obtains patents on virginia commonwealth university (vcu) inventions and markets and licenses such inventions to commerical entities. the foundation's activities promote research efforts at…

Health
11
Bon Secours - Richmond Health System Inc

The mission is to bring compassion to health care and to be good to those in need, especially those who are poor and dying. as a system of caregivers, we commit ourselves to help bring people and communities to health and wholeness.

Health
12
Uva Community Health Foundation

The mission of uvachf is to raise community support and funding through charitable giving for much needed programs, improved facilities, and state of the art technology for uva community health, an integral part of uva health. uva…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Greater Virginia and the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyMedical Professional Associ…Professional Development As…Youth Development & Recreat…Inclusive Arts Education Pr…Food Security & Emergency A…Historic Preservation & Cul…Affordable Housing Developm…Jewish Education and Commun…Regional Community Developm…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%3%<5yr15%5%5–10yr17%11%10–20yr16%26%20–35yr16%32%35–55yr14%24%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%0%<5yr15%0%5–10yr17%0%10–20yr16%91%20–35yr16%6%35–55yr14%3%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/41
the rest of the field
13%
524/3,941

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 73 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/37
Grantees still filing
23/37
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $565,396 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC+4 more — $2,850 · PhilanthropyIndividual grant recipient — $14,430 · OtherIndividual…SupportWorks Housing — $9,500 · OtherSupportWor…JCFR — $6,100 · OtherJCFRVIRGINIA MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS — $5,300 · OtherVIRGINIA M…SCIENCE MUSEUM OF VIRGINIA — $2,900 · OtherCONGREGATION BETH AHABAH — $2,380 · OtherVCU MASSEY CANCER CENTER — $2,300 · Other+38 more — $20,354 · Other+38 morePETER PAUL DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesCOMFORT ZONE CAMP INC — $4,700 · Human ServicesJewish Family Services Inc — $4,550 · Human ServicesRVA Hospice LLC — $2,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $1,500 · Human Services+6 more — $1,100 · Human ServicesMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF GREATER VIRGINIA — $11,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $850 · HealthLEGAL INFORMATION NETWORK FOR CANCER — $600 · Health+2 more — $300 · HealthVIRGINIA HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $3,000 · Arts & CultureTHE RICHMOND SYMPHONY — $1,750 · Arts & CultureThe Virginia Holocaust Museum — $1,450 · Arts & CultureTHE VALENTINE MUSEUM — $350 · Arts & CultureTHE COLLEGIATE SCHOOL — $3,500 · EducationST JAMES'S CHILDREN'S CENTER — $1,000 · EducationLEWIS GINTER BOTANICAL GARDEN INC — $3,250 · Environment
Philanthropy$568,246Other$63,264Human Services$18,850Health$12,750Arts & Culture$6,550Education$4,500Environment$3,250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $565,396 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF GREATER VIRGINIA — $11,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSupportWorks Housing — $9,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPETER PAUL DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC — $5,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCOMFORT ZONE CAMP INC — $4,700 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetJewish Family Services Inc — $4,550 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COLLEGIATE SCHOOL — $3,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLEWIS GINTER BOTANICAL GARDEN INC — $3,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetVIRGINIA HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $3,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFEED MORE INC — $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRVA Hospice LLC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOSHER LIFELONG LEARNING INSTITUTE at GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY — $2,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE RICHMOND SYMPHONY — $1,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Virginia Holocaust Museum — $1,450 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN MACULAR DEGENERATION GOEHRING — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF RICHMOND — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JAMES'S CHILDREN'S CENTER — $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $850 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLEGAL INFORMATION NETWORK FOR CANCER — $600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTRI-RIVER HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetBEYOND BOUNDARIES — $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetRICHMOND JEWISH FOUNDATION — $450 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHARTWAY PROMISE FOUNDATION — $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE VALENTINE MUSEUM — $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetILLUME FAMILY RECOVERY INC — $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCARITAS — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF RICHMOND — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALS ASSOCIATION DCMDVA CHAPTER — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPOPE MEMORIAL HUMANE SOCIETY — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF UNIT 669 INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD PEDIATRICS — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCircle Center Adult Day Services — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF GREATER VIRGINIA
  • Who funds SupportWorks Housing
  • Who funds PETER PAUL DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC
  • Who funds COMFORT ZONE CAMP INC
  • Who funds Jewish Family Services Inc
  • Who funds THE COLLEGIATE SCHOOL
  • Who funds LEWIS GINTER BOTANICAL GARDEN INC
  • Who funds VIRGINIA HISTORICAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds FEED MORE INC
  • Who funds RVA Hospice LLC
  • Who funds OSHER LIFELONG LEARNING INSTITUTE at GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds THE RICHMOND SYMPHONY
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
  • Who funds The Virginia Holocaust Museum
  • Who funds AMERICAN MACULAR DEGENERATION GOEHRING
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF RICHMOND
  • Who funds ST JAMES'S CHILDREN'S CENTER
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
  • Who funds LEGAL INFORMATION NETWORK FOR CANCER
  • Who funds TRI-RIVER HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC
  • Who funds BEYOND BOUNDARIES

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation IncVA32.4× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation Inc · Carmax Foundation · Herndon Foundation · McKesson Foundation Inc · The Mary Morton Parsons Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Kathryn & W H Schwarzschild Fund · The Pauley Family Foundation · Robert G Cabell III and Maude Morgan Cabell Foundation · Thalhimer Family Foundation · Massey Family Foundation · Windsor Fdn Trust Uw Quincy Cole

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Marks-Hofheimer Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 73 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph