Skip to content
Marinus Newhouse Charitable Fund Co at a glance

· Private foundation

Marinus Newhouse Charitable Fund Co

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$92k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Human Services$229kHousing & Shelter$165kEducation$92kCommunity Improvement$86kReligion$33kArts & Culture$19kYouth Development$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $80k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FAMILY ACCESS NETWORK$30,000
COUNCIL ON AGING$20,000
REDMOND SENIOR CENTER$20,000
SHEPARDS HOUSE$10,000
Individual grant recipient$7,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $134k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NEIGHBORHOOD IMPACT: $20k → 10%NEIGHBORHOOD IMPACT: $11k → 10%FAMILY ACCESS NETWORK: $30k → 10%FAMILY ACCESS NETWORK: $30k → 10%FAMILY ACCESS NETWORK: $25k → 10%CENTRAL OREGON COUNCIL ON AGING: $18k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$513k · 9 repeat orgs$128k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
7

Total granted

$513k
$116k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+41%

Still filing today

56%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FA
    Family Access Network Foundation
    3× · 2022–2024 · $85k · revenue +97%
  • RR
    REDMOND ROTARY CHARITABLE CORPORATION
    3× · 2021–2023 · $43k · revenue +14% · 50% of their budget
  • N
    NEIGHBORIMPACT
    2× · 2022–2023 · $31k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • RS
    Redmond School District
    one grant, 2021 · $38k
  • SH
    SHEPHERD'S HOUSE MINISTRIESgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $23k · revenue +314%
  • COUNCIL ON AGING OF CENTRAL OREGONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $18k · revenue +41%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Redmond Economic Development Inc

Stimulate economic development in the local area.

—
2
Home Share Oregon

To connect homeowners with a spare bedroom to rent and home seekers in need of affordable housing

Housing & Shelter
3
Boost Oregon

Boost oregon empowers people to make science-based vaccine decisions for themselves, their families,and the community. we envision a world where people's health decisions are rooted in science.

Education
4
Redmond Council for Senior Citizens Redmond Senior Center

Provide meals and social gatherings for senior citizens.

—
5
Arc of Snohomish County

To serve individuals with developmental disabilities and their families

—
6
Oregon Daycare Inc

Daycare for children ages 2 1/2 to 9, including a four year old Kindergarten program.

—
7
Family Promise of Cowlitz County

To help families with children in our community who are situationally homeless achieve sustainable independence through a community based response by providing temporary housing, usually 60-90 days, along with case management.

Human Services
8
Central Oregon Villages

Central oregon villages mission is to advocate for and provide safe and secure shelter, housing and related services in central oreogn for the unhoused populations or at risk of becoming unhoused.

Housing & Shelter
9
Oregon Wheat Foundation

Issue scholarships for secondary ag eduction

Food & Nutrition
10
Eastern Oregon Healthy Living Alliance

The organization's mission is to support and provide the implementaion of the Regional Community Health Improvement Plan and to support community health development initiatives in Eastern Oregon.

Health
11
Read Northwest

Read Northwest exists to elevate Early Childhood Literacy in Southwest Washington.

Education
12
Redmond Chamber of Commerce

Promotion of local economy.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Neighborimpact; the most unlike its peers is Redmond Rotary Charitable Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SHEPARDS HOUSE: $165,000 · OtherSHEPARDS HOUSECOUNCIL ON AGING: $50,000 · OtherCOUNCIL ON AGINGOPPORTUNITY FOUNDATION: $43,250 · OtherOPPORTUNITY FOUNDATIONRedmond School District: $37,600 · OtherRedmond School DistrictREDMOND SENIOR CENTER: $35,000 · OtherREDMOND SENIOR CENTER+6 more: $49,000 · Other+6 moreFamily Access Network Foundation: $85,000 · Human ServicesFamily Access Network F…NEIGHBORIMPACT: $31,000 · Human ServicesNEIGHBORIMPACTCOUNCIL ON AGING OF CENTRAL OREGON: $18,250 · Human ServicesCOUNCIL ON AGING OF CEN…REDMOND ROTARY CHARITABLE CORPORATION: $42,700 · EducationREDMOND KIWANIS FOUNDATION INC: $42,700 · Community ImprovementSHEPHERD'S HOUSE MINISTRIES: $23,250 · Housing & ShelterOREGON PUBLIC BROADCASTING: $18,750 · Arts & Culture
Other$379,850Human Services$134,250Education$42,700Community Improvement$42,700Housing & Shelter$23,250Arts & Culture$18,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFamily Access Network Foundation: $85,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetREDMOND ROTARY CHARITABLE CORPORATION: $42,700 over 3y, 50% of budgetREDMOND KIWANIS FOUNDATION INC: $42,700 over 3y, 41% of budgetNEIGHBORIMPACT: $31,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSHEPHERD'S HOUSE MINISTRIES: $23,250 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetOREGON PUBLIC BROADCASTING: $18,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOUNCIL ON AGING OF CENTRAL OREGON: $18,250 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetREACH REDMOND: $10,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Family Access Network Foundation ↗
  • Who funds REDMOND ROTARY CHARITABLE CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds REDMOND KIWANIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORIMPACT ↗
  • Who funds SHEPHERD'S HOUSE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds OREGON PUBLIC BROADCASTING ↗
  • Who funds COUNCIL ON AGING OF CENTRAL OREGON ↗
  • Who funds REACH REDMOND ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Deschut…St Charles Health Sys…Maybelle Clark Macdon…The Oregon Community …The Autzen FoundationFirst Interstate Banc…American Endowment Fo…Morgan Stanley Global…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
United Way of Deschutes CountyOR15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Deschutes County · St Charles Health System Inc · Maybelle Clark Macdonald Fund · The Oregon Community Foundation · The Autzen Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Marinus Newhouse Charitable Fund Co funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Marinus Newhouse Charitable Fund Co. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 43%
  • Neighborimpact: 68% of income from government
  • Council On Aging of Central Oregon: 43% of income from government
  • Oregon Public Broadcasting: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Marinus Newhouse’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home