Skip to content

· Private foundation

Marinella Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$138k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$41k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$157kHealth$156kYouth Development$86kRecreation & Sports$55kArts & Culture$21kEnvironment$12kHuman Services$9kAnimals$8kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $119k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$474k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NANTUCKET NEW SCHOOL$41,000
FRIENDS OF THE PUBLIC GARDEN$27,500
BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL$20,000
DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE$10,000
WEST END HOUSE$10,000
BOSTON COLLEGE$10,000
NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS$5,000
EPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF NEW ENGLAND$5,000
STOWE PERFORMING ARTS$2,500
THE BOSTON GLOBE FOUNDATIONGLOBE SANTA$1,000
EMERALD NECKLACE CONSERVANCYCHARLESGATE ALLIANCE$1,000
STOWE LAND TRUST$1,000
MASS GENERAL HOSPITAL$1,000
WGBH$1,000
SPRUCE PEAK ARTS$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%THE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS: $3k → 16%THE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS: $3k → 16%THE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS: $3k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$471k · 21 repeat orgs$43k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
6

Total granted

$471k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+57%

Still filing today

67%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationRecreation & SportsEnvironmentHealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NP
    NANTUCKET PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $95k · revenue +130%
  • TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE
    5× · 2020–2024 · $46k · revenue +50%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $45k · revenue +162%

Funded once

  • SW
    STRONG WINGS ADVENTURE SCHOOL
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • NB
    NANTUCKET BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +61%
  • GC
    Garden Club of the Back Bay Inc
    one grant, 2018 · $4k · revenue +11%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
3
Worcester County Horticultural Society

New england botanic garden at tower hill creates experiences with plants that inspire people and improve the world.

Environment
4
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
5
Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc

The nantucket conservation foundation owns, protects, and stewards over 9,000 acres of land and coastal shoreline, conserves nantucket's rare and significant natural resources, and engages in impactful ecological research to inform…

Environment
6
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
7
Buckingham Browne & Nichols School

Bb&n, an all gender day school in cambridge, massachusetts, was established in 1974 by the merger of two independent schools, the buckingham school and the browne & nichols school, founded respectively in 1889 and 1883. located on multiple…

Education
8
Bartlett Arboretum Association Inc

To cultivate and develop an expansive collection of trees, gardens, and plants for all to explore, enjoy and study; and to provide through education and stewardship, a greener, healthier, more beautiful environment.

Environment
9
Wentworth Institute of Technology Inc

Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…

Education
10
Harvard Conservation Trust

To preserve the unique character and natural resources of harvard.

Environment
11
Boston Harbor Now Inc

Our mission is to ensure that the people of greater boston benefit from a vibrant, resilient, and inclusive waterfront, harbor, and islands; these spaces are equitable, accessible, and adapted to climate change; and to ensure our public,…

Environment
12
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is West End House Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
18/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NANTUCKET PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN INC: $95,000 · OtherNANTUCKET PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN INCEPILEPSY FOUNDATION NEW ENGLAND: $40,000 · OtherEPILEPSY FOUNDATION NEW ENGLANDNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS: $40,000 · OtherNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSISWEST END HOUSE CAMP: $24,000 · OtherWEST END HOUSE CAMPMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED: $20,000 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED+11 more: $46,000 · Other+11 moreTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE: $46,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF BOST…ST MARK'S SCHOOL OF SOUTHBOROUGH INC: $12,500 · EducationST MARK'S SCHOOL…THE FESSENDEN SCHOOL: $12,500 · EducationTHE FESSENDEN SC…PLYMOUTH RIVER SCHOOL PTO INC: $3,000 · EducationWEST END HOUSE INC: $40,000 · Recreation & SportsWEST END HOUS…HOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC: $19,000 · Recreation & SportsHOLE IN THE W…EMERALD NECKLACE CONSERVANCY INC: $4,000 · Recreation & SportsEMERALD NECKL…Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $45,000 · HealthDana-Farbe…ELTON JOHN AIDS FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 · HealthFRIENDS OF THE PUBLIC GARDEN INC: $36,000 · EnvironmentFRIENDS O…STOWE LAND TRUST: $4,000 · EnvironmentSTOWE LAN…Garden Club of the Back Bay Inc: $3,500 · EnvironmentGarden Cl…STOWE PERFORMING ARTS INC: $12,500 · Arts & CultureTHE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INC: $7,500 · Human Services
Other$265,000Education$74,000Recreation & Sports$63,000Health$47,500Environment$43,500Arts & Culture$12,500Human Services$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNANTUCKET PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN INC: $95,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE: $46,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $45,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWEST END HOUSE INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetEPILEPSY FOUNDATION NEW ENGLAND: $40,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE PUBLIC GARDEN INC: $36,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetHOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC: $19,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetST MARK'S SCHOOL OF SOUTHBOROUGH INC: $12,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FESSENDEN SCHOOL: $12,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSTOWE PERFORMING ARTS INC: $12,500 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetTHE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INC: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNANTUCKET BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB INC: $4,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTOWE LAND TRUST: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetEMERALD NECKLACE CONSERVANCY INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGarden Club of the Back Bay Inc: $3,500 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetPLYMOUTH RIVER SCHOOL PTO INC: $3,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetELTON JOHN AIDS FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION OF THE BACK BAY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NANTUCKET PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds WEST END HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds EPILEPSY FOUNDATION NEW ENGLAND ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE PUBLIC GARDEN INC ↗
  • Who funds HOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds ST MARK'S SCHOOL OF SOUTHBOROUGH INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FESSENDEN SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds STOWE PERFORMING ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INC ↗
  • Who funds NANTUCKET BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds STOWE LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds EMERALD NECKLACE CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds Garden Club of the Back Bay Inc ↗
  • Who funds PLYMOUTH RIVER SCHOOL PTO INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds ELTON JOHN AIDS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION OF THE BACK BAY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity FoundationMA13× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Marinella Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Marinella Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • The Home for Little Wanderers Inc: 38% of income from government
  • Epilepsy Foundation New England: 11% of income from government
  • Stowe Land Trust: 10% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston College: 3% of income from government
  • West End House Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Friends of the Public Garden Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Emerald Necklace Conservancy Inc: 0% of income from government
  • The Fessenden School: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Marinella Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph