Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Marc & Friends Charitable Trust

Its FY2017 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$369k
Granted FY2017
15
Grants FY2017
3
States reached
$81k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2017 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2017

  • Under $10k3 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $216k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $147k
$15,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$96k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PITTSBURGH CLO$80,500
PITTSBURGH OPERA$66,000
RITE AID FOUNDATION$40,000
TEMPLE EMANUEL OF SOUTH HILLS$35,000
UNITED WAY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY$26,000
MAKE-A-WISH ILLINOIS$25,000
PITTSBURGH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$25,000
GIRLS INC$15,000
CARNEGIE MUSEUMS PITTSBURGH$15,000
ALLEGHENY CONFERENCE ON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT$12,700
MAKE-A-WISH OF GREATER PA & WV$12,500
POINT PARK UNIVERSITY$10,000
MARCH OF DIMES$5,000
DELTA CHI EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION$1,000
HOMELESS CHILDREN'S EDUCATION FUND$750
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%RITE AID FOUNDATION: $40k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Zoological Society of Pittsburgh

The zoological society of pittsburgh is dedicated to being a leader in, and significant contributor to, the conservation of endangered and threatened species. the society provides an enjoyable family experience that fosters understanding,…

Animals
2
Pidc Development Management Corporation

Pidc dmc administers and coordinates various development projects for the city and other not-for-profit entities.

Community Improvement
3
Pennsylvania Academic Library Consortium Inc

To support education and research at college, university, and research libraries.

Education
4
University of Pittsburgh

The university of pittsburgh, founded in 1787, is one of the oldest institutions of higher education in the united states and one of the nation's top public research universities. for more than two centuries, the university of pittsburgh…

Education
5
Western Electricity Coordinating Council

To effectively and efficiently mitigate risks to the reliability and security of the western interconnection's bulk power system.

Public Benefit
6
Pennsylvania Builders Association

Incorporated in 1945, the pennsylvania builders association is a nonprofit professional trade organization representing approximately 4,066 members from across the commonwealth. pba members include contractors, builders, and remodelers,…

7
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
8
Greater Pittsburgh Convention & Visitors Bureau Inc

Tourism development organization dedicated to expanding the tourism economy across allegheny county.

9
Pittsburgh Council On Higher Education

To provide a means for sharing resources and information among members, engage in joint projects, and offer a common voice on educational matters.

Education
10
National Public Radio Inc

National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

Arts & Culture
11
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
12
Greater Philadelphia Tourism Marketing Corporation

Visit philadelphia is our name and our mission. as the region's official tourism marketing agency, we build greater philadelphia's image, drive visitation and boost the economy.

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Homeless Children's Education Fund and the most unlike its peers is Rite Aid Healthy Futures. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CIVIC LIGHT OPERA ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH — $80,500 · Arts & CultureCIVIC LIGHT OPERA ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGHPITTSBURGH OPERA INC — $66,000 · Arts & CulturePITTSBURGH OPERA INCPITTSBURGH SYMPHONY INC — $25,000 · Arts & CulturePITTSBURGH SYMPHONY INCTEMPLE EMANUEL OF SOUTH HILLS — $35,000 · OtherTEMPLE EMANUEL OF SOUTH HILLSMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC — $25,000 · OtherMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INCGIRLS INC — $15,000 · OtherGIRLS INCCARNEGIE MUSEUMS PITTSBURGH — $15,000 · OtherCARNEGIE MUSEUMS PITTSBURGHALLEGHENY CONFERENCE ON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT — $12,700 · OtherALLEGHENY CONFERENCE ON COMMUNITY DEVE…MAKE-A-WISH OF GREATER PA & WV — $12,500 · OtherMAKE-A-WISH OF GREATER PA & WVPOINT PARK UNIVERSITY — $10,000 · OtherPOINT PARK UNIVERSITYRITE AID HEALTHY FUTURES — $40,000 · Human ServicesRITE AID HEA…THE UNITED WAY OF SOUTHWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA — $26,000 · Philanthropy+1 more — $750 · PhilanthropyMARCH OF DIMES INC — $5,000 · HealthDELTA CHI EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION — $1,000 · Education
Arts & Culture$171,500Other$125,200Human Services$40,000Philanthropy$26,750Health$5,000Education$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCIVIC LIGHT OPERA ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH — $80,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetPITTSBURGH OPERA INC — $66,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetRITE AID HEALTHY FUTURES — $40,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE UNITED WAY OF SOUTHWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA — $26,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPITTSBURGH SYMPHONY INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetALLEGHENY CONFERENCE ON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT — $12,700 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPOINT PARK UNIVERSITY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDELTA CHI EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOMELESS CHILDREN'S EDUCATION FUND — $750 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Richard King Mellon FoundationPA15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Richard King Mellon Foundation · The Heinz Endowments · Eqt Foundation · Hillman Family Foundations · Eden Hall Foundation · The Grable Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Marc & Friends Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Marc & Friends Charitable Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Marc & Friends Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph