How much does Marak Family Foundation Co Foundation Source give?

Marak Family Foundation Co Foundation Source reported 33 grants totaling $307,445 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 23 and 35 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.

What does Marak Family Foundation Co Foundation Source fund?

By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Religion (34%), Human Services (23%), Food & Nutrition (17%).

Who are Marak Family Foundation Co Foundation Source's largest grantees?

By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Medical Center League House of Amarillo Texas Inc ($101k), Casa of the High Plains Inc ($101k), Buckner Children & Family Services Inc ($101k).

Does Marak Family Foundation Co Foundation Source fund new organizations?

In FY2024, 26% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.

Does Marak Family Foundation Co Foundation Source accept unsolicited applications?

Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

Which funders back the same organizations as Marak Family Foundation Co Foundation Source?

Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Amarillo Area Foundation Inc, David D & Nona S Payne Foundation Inc, Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353.

Where is Marak Family Foundation Co Foundation Source based?

Marak Family Foundation Co Foundation Source is based in DE.

Marak Family Foundation Co Foundation Source

Marak Family Foundation Co Foundation Source at a glance

· Private foundation

Marak Family Foundation Co Foundation Source

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$307k

Granted FY2025still arriving

Grants FY2025still arriving

States reached

$33k

Largest

01What it funds

01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$839kHuman Services$566kFood & Nutrition$408kHealth$245kYouth Development$152kCrime & Legal$118kEducation$57kHousing & Shelter$24kOther$0

02FY2025 · 33 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k20 grants · $99k
$10k–50k13 grants · $209k

$7,820

Median grant

States reached

$8.0M

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF AMARILLO	$33,000
ST VINCENT DE PAUL CATHOLIC CHURCH	$26,000
CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF FORT WORTH	$25,000
NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION	$15,635
MEDICAL CENTER LEAGUE HOUSE OF AMAR	$12,375
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF	$12,375
CASA OF THE HIGH PLAINS	$12,375
TRALEE CRISIS CENTER	$12,375
BUCKNER CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICE	$12,375
GOOD SAMARITAN CHRISTIAN SERVICES	$12,375
HIGH PLAINS FOOD BANK	$12,375
PAMPA MEALS ON WHEELS	$12,375
CATHOLIC FAMILY SERVICE INC	$10,000
FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM I	$8,930
MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC -	$8,925

02The need

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $287k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

How this is measured

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

How this is measured

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.

03Its grantees

repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.

$2.4M · 40 repeat orgs$21k to everyone else

40 repeat relationships: 31 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$2.4M

$4k

Still filing today

70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHealthPhilanthropyInternationalReligionCrime & LegalOther

How this is measured

First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

MC
MEDICAL CENTER LEAGUE HOUSE OF AMARILLO TEXAS INC
9× · 2017–2025 · $101k · revenue +16%
CO
CASA OF THE HIGH PLAINS INC
9× · 2017–2025 · $101k · revenue +65%
HP
HIGH PLAINS FOOD BANK
9× · 2017–2025 · $101k · revenue +13%

Funded once

TS
TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CH
one grant, 2024 · $4k

How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Cook Children's Health Plan

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease, and injury.

Health

Cook Children's Physician Network

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease, and injury.

Health

Cook Children's Medical Center

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.

Health

Texas Children's

To create a healthier future for children and women throughout our global community by leading in patient care, education, and research.

Health

Cook Children's Medical Center - Prosper

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.

Health

Texas Children's Hospital Foundation

To create a healthier future for children and women throughout our global community by leading in patient care, education and research.

Health

Cook Children's Home Health

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease, and injury.

Health

Texas Children's Urgent Care

To create a healthier future for children and women throughout our global community by leading in patient care, education and research.

Health

Healing Hands Ministries Inc

Hmm health provides quality healthcare to all its neighbors with love, compassion, and respect.

Health

Feeding Texas

To lead a unified effort for a hunger-free texas.

Community Improvement

Children's Hospital Association of Texas

To advance children's health and well-being by advocating for policies and funding that promote children's access to high-quality, comprehensive health care.

—

Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council

The mission of the Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council is to drive evidence-based improvement in patient care and health equity throughout the region.

—

How this is measured

The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for the Poor Inc; the most unlike its peers is Good Samaritan Christian Services Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

30/30

Grantees still filing

20/30

Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Other$1,486,940Human Services$374,725Health$192,180Crime & Legal$101,395Philanthropy$96,365International$94,495Food & Nutrition$91,405

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Amarillo Area Foundation IncTX17.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amarillo Area Foundation Inc · David D & Nona S Payne Foundation Inc · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · M K Brown Foundation Inc · Mary E Bivins Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Texas Instruments Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · The Pfizer Foundation Inc

How this is measured

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Marak Family Foundation Co Foundation Source funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Marak Family Foundation Co Foundation Source. Bigger dots raise more.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

2get no government money at all

8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–25

How this is measured

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

Play a game based on Marak Family Foundation Co Foundation Source’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home