· Private foundation
Maplewood Fdn Inc Tr Ua Charitable Glenview Trust Company
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LOAVES AND FISHES INC | $7,500 |
| KENTUCKY HARVEST | $7,500 |
| UP FOR WOMEN AND CHILDREN | $7,500 |
| THE CABBAGE PATCH SETTLEMENT HOUSE | $7,500 |
| DARE TO CARE FOOD BANK | $7,500 |
| GRANDFATHER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| GILDA'S CLUB | $5,000 |
| KENTUCKY REFUGEE MINISTRIES | $5,000 |
| WATER STEP | $5,000 |
| FAMILY SCHOLAR HOUSE | $5,000 |
| VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA | $5,000 |
| THE CENTER FOR WOMEN AND FAMILIES | $5,000 |
| HOPE SCARVES | $5,000 |
| LOUISVILLE GROWS | $5,000 |
| BELOVED ASHEVILLE | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $90k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against -32% for the ones you funded once.
29 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CPCABBAGE PATCH SETTLEMENT HOUSE INC9× · 2017–2025 · $60k · revenue +99%
- LALOAVES AND FISHES INC9× · 2017–2025 · $50k · revenue +47%
- FSFAMILY SCHOLAR HOUSE INC9× · 2017–2025 · $48k · revenue +303%
Funded once
- UWUNITED WAY OF COLUMBIA-WILLIAMETTEone grant, 2017 · $2k
- MUMETRO UNITED WAY INCone grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue -32%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To improve the quality of life for all kentuckians through research, education and advocacy on important policy issues facing the commonwealth.
Educate, Inspire, Connect and Mobilize Community Leaders to serve and strengthen greater Indianapolis.
Glean kentucky nourishes kentucky's hungry by rescuing and redistributing surplus fresh foods.
Rogue Climate's mission is to empower Southern Oregon communities most impacted by climate change including low-income, rural, youth, seniors & communities of color, to win climate justice by organizing for clean energy, sustainable jobs &…
Endeavor Louisville is leading the high-impact entrepreneurship movement in Kentucky, Indiana and Ohio, catalyzing long-term economic growth by selecting, mentoring, and supporting the best high-impact entrepreneurs in our region.…
Drive equitable investment in our public parks to improve the health and wellbeing of the entire community.
The catholic education foundation is dedicated to the growth and vitality of catholic education in the archdiocese of louisville. the foundation advances its mission primarily through tuition assistance grants to families who cannot afford…
Food & water watch conducts extensive research and public education to ensure the food and water we consume is safe, accessible and sustainably produced. so we can all enjoy and trust in what we eat and drink, we help people take charge of…
To mobilize people, networks, and capital to spark meaningful change in and beyond louisville.
The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…
United way of central ohio is the local organization that harnesses the power of communities working together - people, nonprofits, businesses and government - to create a stronger, more equitable central ohio. see schedule o.we do this…
Reducing the barriers and burdens that families in poverty experience by increasing access to essential needs.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cabbage Patch Settlement House Inc and the most unlike its peers is Lyme Disease Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CABBAGE PATCH SETTLEMENT HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds LOAVES AND FISHES INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY SCHOLAR HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds GILDA'S CLUB KENTUCKIANA INC ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital Colorado Foundation ↗
- Who funds DARE TO CARE INC ↗
- Who funds KENTUCKY HARVEST INC ↗
- Who funds KENTUCKY REFUGEE MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds LOUISVILLE FREE PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATIO ↗
- Who funds Louisville Grows Incorporated ↗
- Who funds HOPE SCARVES INC ↗
- Who funds THE BLUE RIDGE SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds 21ST CENTURY PARKS INC ↗
- Who funds SISTERS OF THE ROAD INC ↗
- Who funds Uniting Partners for Women and Children ↗
- Who funds WATERSTEP INC ↗
- Who funds Lyme Disease Association Inc ↗
- Who funds OREGON FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR WOMEN AND FAMILIES INC ↗
- Who funds LOUISVILLE COLLEGIATE SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds EDUCATIONAL JUSTICE INC ↗
- Who funds PORTLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BELOVED ASHEVILLE ↗
- Who funds Grandfather Community Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds VIRGINIA CHANCE SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds LOUISVILLE NATURE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Hildegard House Incorporated ↗
- Who funds METRO UNITED WAY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Louisville Inc · The Gheens Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Corporate Depository Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Depository Inc · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Cralle Foundation Inc · Lift a Life Foundation Inc · Snowy Owl Foundation Inc · LG&E and Ku Foundation Inc · Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels Inc · The Lewis and Gladys Bass Family Charitable Foundation · V V Cooke Foundation Corporation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Maplewood Fdn Inc Tr Ua Charitable Glenview Trust Company funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Oregon Food Bank — 21% of income from government
- Portland Community College Foundation Inc — 5% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Maplewood Fdn Inc Tr Ua Charitable Glenview Trust Company?
Find your warmest path to Maplewood Fdn Inc Tr Ua Charitable Glenview Trust Company through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.