Loading…
Loading…
Massachusetts · Nonprofit
PRO-HOME INC (Massachusetts) is funded by 6 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $138,900 in grants to it, the largest being Bristol County Savings Charitable Foundation ($84,650). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
PRO-HOME INC holds deeper cash reserves than three-quarters of the 7,122 housing & shelter nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 7,122 housing & shelter nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2020
Grant income rose $4k → $5k on a roughly flat funder count — a concentrated base.
From the IRS filings of PRO-HOME INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
PRO-HOME INC leans on a few funders — its largest provides 61% of grant income and the top three 91%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 71% · 2018 81% · 2019 75% · 2020 52% · 2022 100% · 2023 100% · 2025 100% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
PRO-HOME INC is locally rooted: 100% of its grant income comes from Massachusetts funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 6 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $136k on record.
Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
91% of spending goes to programs.
50%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Operates in 1 state
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2020 (financials across 2020–2020), and the filings of 6funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing