Skip to content
Plinth
← Funding

Massachusetts · Nonprofit

PRO-HOME INC

PRO-HOME INC (Massachusetts) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $160,700 to it, the largest being Bristol County Savings Charitable Foundation Inc ($105,450). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$114k
Revenue FY2020
6
Funders on record
$161k
Grants received
$384k
Net assets
5/6 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 45%

Against its field

PRO-HOME INC holds deeper cash reserves than three-quarters of the 7,120 housing & shelter nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−38% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve21.7mo · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 7,120 housing & shelter nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2020

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base narrowed from 3 funders to 1 funder, grant income fell $24k → $21k.

From the IRS filings of PRO-HOME INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

PRO-HOME INC leans on a few funders — its largest provides 66% of grant income and the top three 92%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

66%
largest funder
92%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 85% · 2018 78% · 2019 75% · 2020 52% · 2022 100% · 2023 100%growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of PRO-HOME INC's grant income comes from Massachusetts funders.

MA

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

17
18
19
20
22
23
Massachusetts out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 6 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Government funding PRO-HOME INC receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $136k on record.

Federal$136k
grants $136kcontracts $0
17
18
19
20
22
23
Top agencies
  • Department of Housing and Urban Development$136k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like PRO-HOME INC

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Massachusetts

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

91% of spending goes to programs.

Program 91%Management 9%Fundraising 0%

Governance

15
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

50%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

MA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for PRO-HOME INC: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds PRO-HOME INC?
PRO-HOME INC (Massachusetts) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $160,700 to it, the largest being Bristol County Savings Charitable Foundation Inc ($105,450). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does PRO-HOME INC have?
IRS filings report 6 organizations giving $160,700 in grants to PRO-HOME INC, 5 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of PRO-HOME INC?
Bristol County Savings Charitable Foundation Inc is the largest funder on record, with $105,450 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like PRO-HOME INC find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Massachusetts. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2020 (financials across 2020–2020), and the filings of 6funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing