Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mangold Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$257k
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$56k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$399kFood & Nutrition$372kEducation$135kHuman Services$85kInternational$76kPublic Safety & Disaster$54kHousing & Shelter$53kEnvironment$50kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $48k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $153k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $56k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDRENS$56,000
FOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA & SOLANO$18,000
MEALS ON WHEELS OF CONTRA COSTA INC$18,000
ALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$17,000
SPECTRUM COMMUNITY SERVICES$16,000
UC DAVIS FOUNDATION FBO SVM CCAH$15,000
WHITE PONY EXPRESS$15,000
HOSPICE FOUNDATION OF THE EAST BAY$12,000
OPEN HEART KITCHEN$11,000
SHELTER INC OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY$11,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS EAST BAY AREA$10,000
SAVE THE CHILDREN FEDERATION INC$10,000
SAVE MOUNT DIABLO TED CLEMENT EXEC DIR$8,000
STAND FOR FAMILIES FREE OF VIOLENCE$7,000
LIGHTHOUSE COMMUNITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $156k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 9% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BOYS TOWN: $1k → 12%SHOES THAT FIT: $2k → 14%BOYS TOWN: $1k → 12%SHOES THAT FIT: $2k → 14%BOYS TOWN: $1k → 12%SPECTRUM COMMUNITY SERVICES: $16k → 10%SHOES THAT FIT: $2k → 14%BOYS TOWN: $500 → 12%SPECTRUM COMMUNITY SERVICES: $15k → 10%SHOES THAT FIT: $2k → 14%SPECTRUM COMMUNITY SERVICES: $14k → 10%SHOES THAT FIT: $1k → 14%SPECTRUM COMMUNITY SERVICES: $13k → 10%SHOES THAT FIT: $1k → 14%SPECTRUM COMMUNITY SERVICES: $10k → 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS BAY AREA: $8k → 10%WHITE PONY EXPRESS: $15k → 9%WHITE PONY EXPRESS: $13k → 9%WHITE PONY EXPRESS: $13k → 9%WHITE PONY EXPRESS: $10k → 9%WHITE PONY EXPRESS: $9k → 9%WHITE PONY EXPRESS: $6k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 25 repeat orgs$70k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against +36% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 24 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
13

Total granted

$1.3M
$70k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+36%

Still filing today

64%
23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionEducationInternationalHousing & ShelterCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FB
    FOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO
    6× · 2020–2025 · $85k · revenue +55%
  • MO
    MEALS ON WHEELS CONTRA COSTA INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $85k · revenue +8%
  • ALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK
    6× · 2020–2025 · $84k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • MO
    MEAL ON WHEELS OF ALAMEDA COUNTY
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • SM
    SAVE MOUNT DIABLO CO TED CLEMENT
    one grant, 2021 · $8k
  • SM
    SAVE MOUNT DIABLOgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $8k · revenue +36%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
2
Second Harvest of Silicon Valley

To realize our vision of a hunger free community we will provide more food, healthy food and better access to food. we will leverage our own resources and also work with partners in the community.

Food & Nutrition
3
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
4
Second Harvest Food Bank Santa Cruz County

Second harvest food bank's mission is to end hunger and malnutrition by educating and involving the community.

Food & Nutrition
5
San Francisco Food Bank

To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…

—
6
Extrafood

Food Rescue - The Organization rescues excess fresh food from Bay Area businesses, schools and non-profits and immediately delivers the food to safety net partners - such as senior housing centers, after-school programs, and homeless…

Food & Nutrition
7
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
8
Foodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc

To end hunger and transform the health of our community by providing nourishment to those in need by acquiring and distributing safe nutritious food via local agencies and by providing education to solve hunger and nutritional problems in…

Food & Nutrition
9
Central California Food Bank

Ccfb is dedicated to ending hunger, working with over 200 partner agencies to provide food to those experiencing hunger. our mission: transforming lives together, in the passionate pursuit to end hunger in central ca - one meal, one…

Food & Nutrition
10
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
11
The Food Bank for Larimer County

To provide food to all in need through community partnerships and hunger relief programs. Our vision is a hunger-free Larimer County.

Food & Nutrition
12
Food Share Inc

For over 40 years food share has been feeding the hungry in ventura county. it all began when eight friends banded together to provide food to those in need under a bridge in ventura, ca. the early philanthropic movement started in a…

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shelter Inc; the most unlike its peers is Father Flanagan's Boys' Home. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
15/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDRENS: $298,000 · OtherLUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDRENSALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $84,000 · OtherALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANKHOSPICE FOUNDATION OF THE EAST BAY: $67,000 · OtherHOSPICE FOUNDATION OF THE EAST BAYUC DAVIS FOUNDATION FBO SVM CCAH: $56,000 · OtherUC DAVIS FOUNDATION FBO SVM CCAHAMERICAN RED CROSS EAST BAY AREA: $38,000 · OtherSAVE MOUNT DIABLO TED CLEMENT EXEC DIR: $32,000 · OtherBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $26,000 · Other+17 more: $130,500 · Other+17 moreFOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO: $85,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF CONTR…MEALS ON WHEELS CONTRA COSTA INC: $85,000 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON WHEELS CO…OPEN HEART KITCHEN OF LIVERMORE INC: $42,000 · Food & NutritionOPEN HEART KITCHEN…SPECTRUM COMMUNITY SERVICES: $68,000 · Human ServicesSPECTRUM COMM…WHITE PONY EXPRESS: $66,000 · Human ServicesWHITE PONY EX…SHOES THAT FIT: $10,000 · Human ServicesSHOES THAT FI…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $8,000 · Human Services+1 more: $3,500 · Human ServicesSave The Children Federation Inc: $50,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $26,000 · InternationalLIGHTHOUSE COMMUNITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $32,000 · EducationSentinels of Freedom Scholarship Foundation: $26,000 · EducationSHELTER INC: $53,000 · Housing & ShelterSTAND FOR FAMILIES FREE OF VIOLENCE: $37,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$731,500Food & Nutrition$212,000Human Services$155,500International$76,000Education$58,000Housing & Shelter$53,000Crime & Legal$37,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO: $85,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS CONTRA COSTA INC: $85,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $84,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSPECTRUM COMMUNITY SERVICES: $68,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetWHITE PONY EXPRESS: $66,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSHELTER INC: $53,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $50,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOPEN HEART KITCHEN OF LIVERMORE INC: $42,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetSTAND FOR FAMILIES FREE OF VIOLENCE: $37,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetLIGHTHOUSE COMMUNITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $32,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $26,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSentinels of Freedom Scholarship Foundation: $26,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $26,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetKQED INC: $24,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSHOES THAT FIT: $10,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSAVE MOUNT DIABLO: $8,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHERIFF'S CHARITIES INC: $4,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $3,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS CONTRA COSTA INC ↗
  • Who funds ALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds SPECTRUM COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds WHITE PONY EXPRESS ↗
  • Who funds SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds OPEN HEART KITCHEN OF LIVERMORE INC ↗
  • Who funds STAND FOR FAMILIES FREE OF VIOLENCE ↗
  • Who funds LIGHTHOUSE COMMUNITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds Sentinels of Freedom Scholarship Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds KQED INC ↗
  • Who funds SHOES THAT FIT ↗
  • Who funds SAVE MOUNT DIABLO ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds SHERIFF'S CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Father Flanagan's Boys' Home ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

East Bay Community FoundationCA19.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: East Bay Community Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Neil & Amelia McDaniel Charitable Trust Dtd 11/01/77 · Lowell Berry Foundation · Heffernan Group Foundation · Summit Financial Foundation · Justice Justice Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Dean and Margaret Lesher Foundation · San Jose Mercury News Wish Book Fund Inc · The Albertsons Companies Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mangold Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mangold Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mangold Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph