Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Malvin and Ruth Kaufman Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$60k
Granted FY2023
18
Grants FY2023
7
States reached
$27k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172023.

Religion$188kPhilanthropy$122kArts & Culture$57kHealth$8kInternational$6kHuman Services$2kEducation$950Animals$250Other$0
02FY2023 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k16 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $37k
$1,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTH SUBURBAN SYNAGOGUE BETH EL$27,050
JEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM SPRINGS$10,125
JEWISH FEDERATION OF THE DESERT$5,475
CONGREGATION BETH JUDEA$5,000
PALM SPRINGS FRIENDS OF PHILHARMONIC$2,960
FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES$2,066
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM$2,000
CANCER WELLNESS CENTER$1,000
LITERACY SOCIETY OF THE DESERT$1,000
HILLEL INTERNATIONAL$835
DESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$500
PENN HILLEL$500
BRIARWOOD SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION$500
HILLEL AT THE GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY$500
FOR AUTISTIC KIDS FOUNDATION$200
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–21, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 25% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER: $250 → 6%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $25 → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 5%GLENKIRK: $50 → 14%CJE SENIOR LIFE: $350 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CA
MD
KS
TN
DC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$345k · 20 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +56% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.

20 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2023, 12 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
23

Total granted

$345k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+21%

Still filing today

55%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationHealthInternationalPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JU
    JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO
    5× · 2017–2022 · $100k · revenue +13%
  • RM
    RANCHO MIRAGE WRITERS FESTIVAL
    5× · 2017–2021 · $20k · revenue +184%
  • PS
    PALM SPRINGS FRIENDS OF PHILHARMONIC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $18k · revenue +70%

Funded once

  • WF
    WRITERS FESTIVAL 2019
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • CB
    CONGREGATION BETH YESHURUN FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
  • SW
    Stand with Us (Israel)
    one grant, 2017 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
2
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
3
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

4
The Steinhardt Foundation for Jewish Life Inc
Religion
5
University of Judaism Foundation
6
Greater Miami Hillel Foundation Inc

The mission of the organization is to enrich the lives of jewish undergraduate and graduate students so that they may enrich the jewish people and the world.

7
Jewish Federation of Southern Arizona

Jewish philanthropies of southern arizona (jpsa) is committed to achieving the full potential of jewish philanthropy, now and for future generations. comprised of jewish federation of southern arizona (jfsa or federation) and jewish…

Philanthropy
8
Jewish Federation of Greater Philadelphia

The jewish federation of greater philadelphia mobilizes financial and volunteer resources to create a bright future for jewish people everywhere. the jewish federation cares for those in need, combats antisemitism and global crises, and…

Philanthropy
9
Weitzman National Museum of American Jewish History

The weitzman national museum of american jewish history, on independence mall in philadelphia, presents educational programs and experiences that preserve, explore, and celebrate the history of jews in america. its purpose is to connect…

Arts & Culture
10
Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago

Federation amplifies our collective strength to make the world a better place for everyone. we assist people in need, impact chicagoans of all faiths; support israel and the jewish people worldwide; respond swiftly to crises; cultivate…

Philanthropy
11
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

12
Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles

We steward $1.5 billion in charitable assets through donor-advised funds, endowments, and other giving vehicles. partnering with 1,400 individuals, families, and organizations, we build enduring legacies and multigenerational impact. in…

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Friends of Magen David Adom and the most unlike its peers is The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCancer Support OrganizationsClassical Music EnsemblesAnimal Rescue and AdoptionVeteran Support ServicesPublic Library SupportFallen First Responder Supp…Developmental Disabilities …Community Arts OrganizationsCommunity FoundationsJewish Community Federations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%0%<5yr13%0%5–10yr18%11%10–20yr15%37%20–35yr14%33%35–55yr22%19%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%0%<5yr13%0%5–10yr18%6%10–20yr15%49%20–35yr14%16%35–55yr22%29%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/31
the rest of the field
12%
8,891/72,328

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
23/27
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NORTH SUBURBAN SYNAGOGUE BETH EL — $163,720 · OtherNORTH SUBURBAN SYNAGOGUE BETH ELJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM SPRINGS AND DESERT AREA — $18,925 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM SPRINGS AND DESERT AREACONGREGATION BETH JUDEA — $10,000 · OtherCONGREGATION BETH JUDEA FOUNDATION — $9,500 · Other+25 more — $18,075 · Other+25 moreJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO — $100,350 · PhilanthropyJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOL…+2 more — $3,375 · PhilanthropyPALM SPRINGS FRIENDS OF PHILHARMONIC — $17,670 · Arts & CulturePALM SPRI…The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum — $11,655 · Arts & CultureThe Unite…+2 more — $1,485 · Arts & CultureRANCHO MIRAGE WRITERS FESTIVAL — $20,100 · EducationBRIARWOOD SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION — $750 · Education+1 more — $200 · EducationAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $2,100 · InternationalFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $2,066 · InternationalISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE — $500 · InternationalJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES — $1,000 · Human ServicesCOUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY — $350 · Human ServicesISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND — $250 · Human Services+3 more — $125 · Human ServicesCANCER WELLNESS CENTER — $1,000 · HealthCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC — $300 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $50 · HealthHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE — $835 · Religion
Other$220,220Philanthropy$103,725Arts & Culture$30,810Education$21,050International$4,666Human Services$1,725Health$1,350Religion$835

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO — $100,350 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRANCHO MIRAGE WRITERS FESTIVAL — $20,100 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM SPRINGS AND DESERT AREA — $18,925 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetPALM SPRINGS FRIENDS OF PHILHARMONIC — $17,670 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum — $11,655 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $2,775 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $2,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $2,066 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLITERARY SOCIETY OF THE DESERT — $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCANCER WELLNESS CENTER — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE — $835 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRIARWOOD SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION — $750 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFOR AUTISTIC KIDS FOUNDATION — $600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL AT THE GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPALM SPRINGS ART MUSEUM — $485 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY — $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRANCHO MIRAGE LIBRARY & OBSERVATORY FOUNDATION — $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBeit T'Shuvah — $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAARP FOUNDATION — $50 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGlenkirk — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $50 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Federation of Metropolitan ChicagoIL19.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Milwaukee Jewish Federation Inc · Jarvis Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Malvin and Ruth Kaufman Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Malvin and Ruth Kaufman Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Malvin and Ruth Kaufman Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph