Skip to content
Malouf Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Malouf Foundation

To confront child sexual exploitation, specifically sex trafficking and online abuse.

$993k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$684k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Crime & Legal$1.5MArts & Culture$286kHuman Services$137kInternational$132kHealth$76kCommunity Improvement$36kEducation$10kPhilanthropy$10k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k2 grants · $297k
  • $250k+1 grant · $684k
$196,987
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PHASE Alliance$684,018
Elizabeth Smart Foundation$196,987
Fight the New Drug$100,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $396k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CHILDRENS JUSTICE CENTER: $141k → 12%Americas Kids Belong: $30k → 9%CHILDRENS JUSTICE CENTER: $10k → 12%CHILDRENS JUSTICE CENTER: $6k → 12%Elizabeth Smart Foundation: $197k → 8%Elizabeth Smart Foundation: $12k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MA
CA
UT
CO
MO
VA
HI
OK
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.7M · 7 repeat orgs$514k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
12

Total granted

$2.7M
$414k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+56%

Still filing today

86%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthCrime & LegalArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OR
    OUR RESCUE
    2× · 2018–2019 · $286k · revenue +102%
  • CA
    CITIZENS AGAINST PHYSICAL AND SEXUAL ABUSE
    6× · 2018–2023 · $107k · revenue +257%
  • TD
    THE DEMAND PROJECT INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $69k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • DH
    Dahlias Hope Non Profit Incgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $70k · revenue +69%
  • IC
    INTERNET CRIMES AGAINST CHILD
    one grant, 2018 · $60k
  • UC
    UTAH COUNTY DEPUTIES ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2022 · $60k · revenue +15% · 58% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Malouf Foundation

To confront child sexual exploitation, specifically sex trafficking and online abuse. We fulfill our mission by providing education, promoting healing, and furthering advocacy for survivors.

Philanthropy
2
Untrafficked Inc
Human Services
3
Alive At Last

Alive at Last helps victims of sexual exploitation and trafficking live free and discover their God-given purpose.

Crime & Legal
4
GenerationAll

Our Mission is to drastically minimize the generational impact of sexual violence through advocacy and healing by breaking the cycle of generational trauma through advocacy, awareness, and change.

Human Services
5
The Stop Trafficking Project Inc

Our purpose is to end domestic minor sex trafficking (DMST) before it starts by disrupting the exploitation of vulnerability

Religion
6
Child Liberation Foundation Inc

The Child Liberation Foundation (CLF), founded in February 2017, is dedicated to eradicating child trafficking worldwide. In 2023, CLF expanded its mission beyond rescue operations to emphasize rehabilitation and healing for survivors of…

Human Services
7
Utah Swat Inc
—
8
California Human Trafficking Investigators and Prosecuters Asso
Crime & Legal
9
Mukti International

Mukti is a Sanskrit word that means "freedom from oppression and exploitation". Our goal is to see women and children find pathways to freedom. We partner with organizations around Asia that are on the frontlines helping to rescue and…

Crime & Legal
10
Shared Hope International

Shared hope international exists to rescue and restore women and children in crisis. we are leaders in a worldwide effort to prevent and eradicate sex trafficking and slavery through education and public awareness.

Human Services
11
Freedom Firm Usa

Freedom Firm USA exists to raise awareness and provide funding to support the operation of Freedom Firm in India whose mission is to identify and rescue minor girls who have been trafficked into the commercial sex trade in India; to…

International
12
DeliverFund

DeliverFund disrupts global human trafficking markets by combining uniquely qualified personnel with the best technologies and then leveraging them in new ways to reach and rescue victims of human trafficking.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Safe House Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is University of the Nations Kona Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/18
Grantees still filing
13/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PHASE Alliance: $1,797,479 · Crime & LegalPHASE AllianceTHE DEMAND PROJECT INC: $69,447 · Crime & Legal+1 more: $34,000 · Crime & LegalElizabeth Smart Foundation: $208,969 · Human ServicesElizabeth Smart F…FRIENDS OF THE CACHE COUNTY CHILDRENS JUSTICE CENTER: $157,333 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF THE CA…CITIZENS AGAINST PHYSICAL AND SEXUAL ABUSE: $107,009 · Human ServicesCITIZENS AGAINST …Americas Kids Belong: $30,000 · Human ServicesAmericas Kids Bel…OUR RESCUE: $286,103 · Arts & CultureOUR RESCUEUTAH COUNTY DEPUTIES ASSOCIATION: $60,000 · Arts & CultureUTAH COUNTY …Fight the New Drug Inc: $100,000 · HealthDahlias Hope Non Profit Inc: $70,000 · HealthSocial Medicine International: $36,000 · Health+1 more: $6,402 · HealthINTERNET CRIMES AGAINST CHILD: $60,000 · OtherINTERNET CRIMES AGAINST CHILD: $30,000 · OtherCITY OF LOGAN: $14,300 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF THE NATIONS KONA FOUNDATION: $11,610 · OtherThe Community Foundation of Utah: $10,000 · OtherKEN GARFF FOR GOOD: $10,000 · OtherENGAGE NOW AFRICA INC: $50,000 · InternationalSAFE HOUSE PROJECT INC: $36,000 · Community Improvement
Crime & Legal$1,900,926Human Services$503,311Arts & Culture$346,103Health$212,402Other$135,910International$50,000Community Improvement$36,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPHASE Alliance: $1,797,479 over 2y, 85% of budgetOUR RESCUE: $286,103 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetElizabeth Smart Foundation: $208,969 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE CACHE COUNTY CHILDRENS JUSTICE CENTER: $157,333 over 3y, 23% of budgetCITIZENS AGAINST PHYSICAL AND SEXUAL ABUSE: $107,009 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetFight the New Drug Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetDahlias Hope Non Profit Inc: $70,000 over 1y, 9.5% of budgetTHE DEMAND PROJECT INC: $69,447 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetUTAH COUNTY DEPUTIES ASSOCIATION: $60,000 over 1y, 58% of budgetENGAGE NOW AFRICA INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetSAFE HOUSE PROJECT INC: $36,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetSocial Medicine International: $36,000 over 1y, 59% of budgetRAPHA HOUSE INTERNATIONAL INC: $34,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetAmericas Kids Belong: $30,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetThe Community Foundation of Utah: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKEN GARFF FOR GOOD: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetINTERMOUNTAIN HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC: $6,402 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

doTERRA Healing Hands…Sorenson Legacy Found…The US Charitable Gif…American Endowment Fo…The Blackbaud Giving …Charities Aid Foundat…Network for GoodAmerican Online Givin…The Bank of America C…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
doTERRA Healing Hands FoundationUT17.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: doTERRA Healing Hands Foundation · Sorenson Legacy Foundation · The US Charitable Gift Trust · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Malouf Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Malouf Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Malouf Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Malouf Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Malouf’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home