· Private foundation
Malloy Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k81 grants · $86k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THORNWELL HOME | $11,500 |
| DO CANCER | $4,000 |
| LAFAYETTE 200 CHERAW | $4,000 |
| FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH | $3,800 |
| WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC | $3,000 |
| ST DAVID'S SCHOOL | $3,000 |
| CHILDREN'S TRUST OF SOUTH CAROLINA | $3,000 |
| MCARN COMMUNITY MINISTRY | $2,700 |
| PATHFINDERS UNITED | $2,500 |
| HOSPICE OF CHESTERFIELD CO FOUNDAT | $2,500 |
| NORTHEASTERN TECHNICAL COLLEGE | $2,200 |
| CHERAW HIGH SCHOOL BIB | $2,000 |
| ST DAVID'S CEMETERY ASSOCIATION | $2,000 |
| SC ENVIRONMETAL LAW PROJECT | $2,000 |
| CAREFIRSTCAROLINA FOUNDATION | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $53k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
96 repeat relationships — 75 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CTCHILDREN'S TRUST OF SOUTH CAROLINA6× · 2020–2025 · $15k · revenue +28%
- SDST DAVID'S CEMETERY ASSOCIATION INC6× · 2020–2025 · $12k · revenue +71%
- CUCOKER UNIVERSITY6× · 2020–2025 · $9k · revenue +2%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $5k
- CCCHESTERFIELD CTY HISTORIC PRESERVATION COone grant, 2020 · $5k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2024 · $2k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Conway hospital community services provides outpatient health care services to horry county and the surrounding community in conjunction with conway hospital, inc., a non-profit acute care hospital system.
To provide compassionate, exceptional and highly reliable care.
Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.
Provide the highest quality, patient-centered health care services for low-income and other underserved individuals.
Facilitate networking among hospitals
Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.
Southern wesleyan university is a christ-centered, student-focused learning community devoted to transforming lives by challenging students to be dedicated scholars and servant-leaders who impact the world for christ.
Piedmont healthcare, inc., ("phc") is organized exclusively for the benefit of, to manage the functions of, and to carry out the charitable, scientific, and educational purposes of its subsidiary organizations.
The foundation is set up to deliver one program - look good feel better. the mission of this nationwide program is to improve the quality of life of women, men, and teens undergoing cancer treatment by offering advice on how to cope with…
Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.
Cumberland Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of the patient's ability to pay.
To provide healthcare marked by compassion and sustainable excellence in a progressive environment, guided by physicians, delivered by exceptional professionals, and inspired by the communities we serve.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Connie Maxwell Children's Ministries and the most unlike its peers is Mcarn Community Ministry Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 7% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 112 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE PATHFINDERS UNITED ↗
- Who funds MCARN COMMUNITY MINISTRY INC ↗
- Who funds DO CANCER ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S TRUST OF SOUTH CAROLINA ↗
- Who funds ST DAVID'S CEMETERY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds COMPASSIONATE CARE OF CHESTERFIELD ↗
- Who funds COKER UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CAREFIRST CAROLINA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COULTER LONG NATIONAL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds MCLEOD HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Prisma Health-Upstate ↗
- Who funds Lafayette Trail ↗
- Who funds THOMPSON CHILD & FAMILY FOCUS INC ↗
- Who funds SPARTANBURG METHODIST COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds Henderson County & Thermal Belt Habitat for Humanity ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF PICKENS COUNTY ↗
- Who funds PEE DEE COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC AND SEXUAL ASSAULT ↗
- Who funds CROSSNORE COMMUNITIES FOR CHILDREN ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Central Carolina Community Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · The First Bank Foundation · The Duke Endowment · The Leon Levine Foundation · Foundation for the Carolinas · The Byerly Foundation · Spartanburg County Foundation · Betty S Campbell Charitable Foundation · Joan Sasser Coker and Charles Westfield Coker Charitable Foundation · Nurse-Family Partnership · Eastern Carolina Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Malloy Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Malloy Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Malloy Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.