Skip to content

· Private foundation

Majid Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$35k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$144kHuman Services$24kInternational$18kEducation$4kHousing & Shelter$4kReligion$3kHealth$2kPhilanthropy$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $16k
$9,367
Median grant
2
States reached
$10k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$16,180
Individual grant recipient$9,367
MAASWORLD$6,500
Individual grant recipient$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 41% of grant dollars ($110k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 59% that went abroad ($155k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MAASWORLD: $7k → 11%MAASWORLD: $5k → 11%MAASWORLD: $5k → 11%MAASWORLD: $4k → 11%MAASWORLD: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
OH
CA
VA
AZ
NM
MS
TX

Beyond the US: 59% of all-years giving ($155k)

2 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Canada$139k · 10 grants
Pakistan$15k · 3 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$248k · 11 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +9% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
17

Total granted

$248k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
+6%

Still filing today

18%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHuman ServicesReligionCivil RightsArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    8× · 2017–2024 · $137k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    3× · 2022–2024 · $25k
  • MW
    MAAS WORLD INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $24k

Funded once

  • IL
    INNOVARGE LLC
    one grant, 2020 · $6k
  • SMILE TRAIN INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $2k · revenue +26%
  • JF
    JUSTICE FOR ALL
    one grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue +6%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Muslim Aid America

Provide help to people who are victims of natural disasters or conflicts or suffering from poverty, hunger, disease, illiteracy, discrimination, homelessness, debt, unemployment, injustice, or lack of skills or economic opportunity.

Public Safety & Disaster
2
Zahra Foundation Ltd

Zahra foundation provides humartian aid to the destiute orphans of iraq and people suffering extreme circumstances around the world

International
3
Islamic Relief Usa

Islamic relief usa provides relief and development in a dignified manner regardless of gender, race, or religion, and works to empower individuals in their communities and give them a voice in the world.

International
4
International Institute of Islamic Thought the Fairfax Institute
Education
5
Conscience International Inc

Humanitarian Aid, Human Rights, Peacemaking

International
6
Rahma Worldwide Aid and Development

Rahma delivers emergency and development programs to needy communities, without discrimination based on gender, race, religion, or location. we aim to empower and develop individuals and communities affected by hardship globally.

International
7
Isaad foundation

Isaad Foundation aspires to preserve human dignity and to help achieve happiness, and to achieve the necessary needs for all individuals.

Philanthropy
8
Shia Rights Watch Inc

Humanatarian support and awareness

International
9
Al Ansaar Foundation for Humanity
Philanthropy
10
MedGlobal Inc

MedGlobal is a humanitarian non-governmental organization working to serve vulnerable communities around the world by providing innovative, free, and sustainable healthcare. Our health services support refugees, displaced persons, and…

Health
11
Sudanese American Relief and Development Cnetr
Education
12
Bangladesh American Society of Muslim Aid for Huma
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Justice for All; the most unlike its peers is Maas World Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $137,189 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $17,367 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $15,200 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+18 more: $22,496 · Other+18 moreMAAS WORLD INC: $23,900 · Human ServicesMAAS WORLD…PANZI FOUNDATION: $16,000 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INC: $1,000 · InternationalZaytuna College Inc: $4,000 · ReligionJUSTICE FOR ALL: $1,500 · Civil RightsHUMANITY FIRST USA: $500 · Arts & Culture
Other$217,252Human Services$23,900International$17,000Religion$4,000Civil Rights$1,500Arts & Culture$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPANZI FOUNDATION: $16,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetZaytuna College Inc: $4,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUSTICE FOR ALL: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDOWNTOWN ISLAMIC CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANITY FIRST USA: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MAAS WORLD INC ↗
  • Who funds PANZI FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Zaytuna College Inc ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds JUSTICE FOR ALL ↗
  • Who funds DOWNTOWN ISLAMIC CENTER ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMANITY FIRST USA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA10.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Majid Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Majid Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Majid Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph