Skip to content

· Private foundation

Madigan Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$128k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Religion$213kHealth$109kArts & Culture$69kHousing & Shelter$55kEducation$48kPublic Safety & Disaster$31kHuman Services$31kFood & Nutrition$24kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $92k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $36k
$6,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FOUNDATIONS$16,000
CSJ (SHAWN'S SISTERS OF ST JOSEPH OF CARONOLET)$10,000
JACKIE NITSCHKE CENTER$10,000
SERRA INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION$6,000
ST VINCENT DE PAUL$6,000
MAUTHE CENTER$6,000
Individual grant recipient$6,000
SACRED HEART SEMINARY AND SCHOOL OF THEOLOGY$6,000
PAUL'S PANTRY$6,000
Individual grant recipient$6,000
FRIENDS OF PBS WISCONSIN$6,000
BAY SETTLEMENT SISTERS (OF ST FRANCIS OF THE HOLY CROSS)$6,000
GREATER GREEN BAY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$6,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF GREEN BAY$6,000
ST WILLEBRORD PARISH$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GOLDEN HOUSE: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
NY
NE
MO
MD
AR
LA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$565k · 29 repeat orgs$124k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +1% since the first grant, against -11% for those funded once.

29 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
20

Total granted

$565k
$98k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+1%
-11%

Still filing today

28%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHousing & ShelterEducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SI
    SERRA INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $51k · revenue +17%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF PBS WISCONSIN INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $40k · revenue +24%
  • FH
    FOUNDATIONS HEALTH & WHOLENESS INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $19k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • SO
    SISTER OF ST JOSEPH OF CARONDELET
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • CC
    CURATIVE CONNECTIONS INC
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -2%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New Community Shelter Foundation Inc

New community shelter foundation, inc. is organized and operated for charitable, educational, religious, and scientific purposes exclusively for the benefit and support of the greater green bay community foundation, inc.

Housing & Shelter
2
Neighborhood Housing Services of Southwest Wisconsin Inc

To develop, administer and conduct housing rehabilitation services; and to provide home ownership counseling and other related neighborhood improvement activities.

—
3
Neighborhood Housing Services of Southeast Wisconsin Inc

The purpose of neighborhood housing services of southeast wisconsin, inc. is to renew pride, restore confidence,promote reinvestment, and revitalize the nhs neighborhoods through the efforts of local residents acting in concert with…

Housing & Shelter
4
Congregational Home Inc

Congregational home's mission is an extension of the mission of first congregational church -waukesha, whose mission is to maintain a caring community for the elderly offering healthcare and other services. congregational home declares…

Health
5
Friendship House of Milwaukee
—
6
The Guest House of Milwaukee Inc

Guest House of Milwaukee provides a full continuum of services to individuals and families experiencing homelessness or at risk of losing housing. Guest House serves more than 2,000 individuals annually through emergency shelter, housing,…

Housing & Shelter
7
Milwaukee Catholic Home Inc

Rooted in our catholic tradition and commitment to christian love and community, milwaukee catholic home, inc. (mch) provides continuing care services for older adults.

Human Services
8
Habitat for Humanity of Waukesha County Inc

Seeking to put god's love into action. habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

—
9
Ecumenical Partnership for Housing Inc

As faith calls us to minister with our neighbors, ecumenical partnership for housing provides safety, stability, and solutions leading to self-sufficiency for families with children facing homelessness

Housing & Shelter
10
Harwood Place Inc

Harwood place, inc. is dedicated to serving older adults and enriching the lives of those we touch by providing compassionate and loving care.

Housing & Shelter
11
The Lutheran Home Inc

The lutheran home, inc. is dedicated to serving older adults and enriching the lives of those we touch by providing compassionate and loving care.

Health
12
Wisconsin Lutheran Home Ministries Inc

To share christ's love as we serve the spiritual, physical, intellectual and emotional needs of people entrusted to our care and others whose lives we touch.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Green Bay Inc; the most unlike its peers is Lucky 7 Dog Rescue Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
7/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SERRA INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $51,000 · OtherSERRA INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATIONUWGB FOUNDATION: $33,000 · OtherUWGB FOUNDATIONCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $31,000 · OtherCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICESFOUNDATIONS: $25,000 · OtherST VINCENT DE PAUL: $25,000 · OtherSISTERS OF ST FRANCIS OF THE HOLY CROSS: $23,000 · OtherPAUL'S PANTRY: $21,800 · OtherCSJ (SHAWN'S SISTERS OF ST JOSEPH OF CARONOLET): $20,000 · OtherST WILLEBRORD CHURCH: $20,000 · OtherFOUNDATIONS HEALTH & WHOLENESS INC: $18,500 · OtherRICHARD MAUTHE CENTER: $18,000 · OtherECUMENICAL FOUNDATION INC: $18,000 · OtherBAY BEACH WILDLIFE SANCTUARY: $18,000 · OtherSISTERS OF ST JOSEPH OF CARONDELET: $18,000 · Other+28 more: $189,200 · Other+28 moreST JOHN THE EVANGELIST HOMELESS SHELTER INC: $25,000 · Housing & ShelterFREEDOM HOUSE MINISTRIES INC: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterNEW COMMUNITY SHELTER INC: $8,200 · Housing & ShelterFRIENDS OF PBS WISCONSIN INC: $40,000 · Arts & CultureJACKIE NITSCHKE CENTER INC: $28,000 · HealthTHE GATHERING PLACE INC: $10,000 · HealthSECTION SOBER INC: $2,000 · HealthNORTHEAST WISCONSIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EducationCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF GREEN BAY INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesGOLDEN HOUSE INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesCURATIVE CONNECTIONS INC: $10,000 · Employment
Other$529,500Housing & Shelter$43,200Arts & Culture$40,000Health$40,000Education$15,000Human Services$11,000Employment$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSERRA INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $51,000 over 5y, 3.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF PBS WISCONSIN INC: $40,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetJACKIE NITSCHKE CENTER INC: $28,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetST JOHN THE EVANGELIST HOMELESS SHELTER INC: $25,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetFOUNDATIONS HEALTH & WHOLENESS INC: $18,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetECUMENICAL FOUNDATION INC: $18,000 over 3y, 17% of budgetTHE GATHERING PLACE INC: $10,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetCURATIVE CONNECTIONS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHEAST WISCONSIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHERITAGE HILL CORPORATION: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetFREEDOM HOUSE MINISTRIES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetNEW COMMUNITY SHELTER INC: $8,200 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF GREEN BAY INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY NORTHWOODS INC: $6,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetGREATER GREEN BAY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOLDEN HOUSE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLUCKY 7 DOG RESCUE CORPORATION: $2,500 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetSECTION SOBER INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetNATIONAL RAILROAD MUSEUM INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SERRA INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF PBS WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds JACKIE NITSCHKE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JOHN THE EVANGELIST HOMELESS SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATIONS HEALTH & WHOLENESS INC ↗
  • Who funds ECUMENICAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GATHERING PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds CURATIVE CONNECTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHEAST WISCONSIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HERITAGE HILL CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds FREEDOM HOUSE MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW COMMUNITY SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF GREEN BAY INC ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY NORTHWOODS INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER GREEN BAY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Green Bay Community Foundation IncWI35.4× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Green Bay Community Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · George Kress Foundation Inc · Wisconsin Public Service Foundation · Community Foundation for the Fox Valley Region Inc · De Pere Christian Outreach · Little Rapids Corporation - Egan Family Foundation Inc · Schneider National Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Feeco International Foundation Inc · Cloud Family Foundation Inc · K C Stock Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Madigan Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Madigan Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Madigan Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph