· Private foundation
Feeco International Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k12 grants · $37k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $58k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GREATER GREEN BAY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $57,600 |
| CHILDREN'S WISCONSIN | $10,000 |
| WISCONSIN HUMANE SOCIETY | $10,000 |
| NEW COMMUNITY SHELTER INC | $10,000 |
| CURATIVE CONNECTIONS | $8,000 |
| ST MARY'S PARISH | $8,000 |
| JACKIE NITCHKE CENTER | $5,000 |
| AGING & DISABILITY RESOURCE CENTER | $4,100 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,063 |
| UWGB FOUNDATION | $3,000 |
| LUCKY 7 DOG RESCUE | $2,000 |
| UWGB PHOENIX FUND | $2,000 |
| RIBBON OF HOPE FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| GREEN BAY AREA CATHOLIC EDUCATION (GRACE) | $1,000 |
| NOTRE DAME ACADEMY | $100 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–23, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.
27 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NCNEW COMMUNITY SHELTER INC3× · 2022–2025 · $24k · revenue +38%
WISCONSIN HUMANE SOCIETY5× · 2021–2025 · $19k · revenue +10%- JNJACKIE NITSCHKE CENTER INC2× · 2022–2025 · $15k · revenue +7%
Funded once
- FHFREEDOM HOUSE MINISTRIES INCone grant, 2022 · $11k · revenue -11%
- WFWMC FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +11%
- GHGOLDEN HOUSE INCone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -22%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.
The humane animal welfare society of waukesha county leads the community in animal welfare and assures sanctuary for animals in need.
To preserve and enhance the quality of life at home, with dignity and care.
To improve and save lives through compassionate care, community engagement and advocacy for animals.
Providing innovative and life-enriching services for children, adolescents, and adults with disabilities.
As america's first animal shelter, founded in 1869, women's humane society dba women's animal center (wac), assists people in the community, saves the lives of animals, and improves the health of pets through its shelter and adoptions…
To share christ's love as we serve the spiritual, physical, intellectual and emotional needs of people entrusted to our care and others whose lives we touch.
The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…
Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.
Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.
Our goal is to sustainably improve animal welfare, provide veterinary care, and improve veterinary education globally. in order to achieve this goal, we work in over 10 countries, across 5 continents, supporting local people and animals,…
The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Green Bay Community Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 71 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GREATER GREEN BAY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NEW COMMUNITY SHELTER INC ↗
- Who funds WISCONSIN HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds CURATIVE CONNECTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds JACKIE NITSCHKE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds FREEDOM HOUSE MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds PAUL'S PANTRY INC ↗
- Who funds WMC FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds GOLDEN HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RIBBON OF HOPE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds LUCKY 7 DOG RESCUE CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds HAPPILY EVER AFTER ANIMAL SANCTUARY ↗
- Who funds BAY-LAKES COUNCIL #635 BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds GREATER GREEN BAY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
- Who funds BROWN COUNTY ORAL HEALTH PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds DANCE COMPANY INC ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Greater Green Bay Community Foundation Inc · Schneider National Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · George Kress Foundation Inc · Wisconsin Public Service Foundation · Bay Care Clinic Foundation Ltd · Community Foundation for the Fox Valley Region Inc · Cornerstone Foundation of Northeastern Wisconsin Inc · Little Rapids Corporation - Egan Family Foundation Inc · US Ventureschmidt Family Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Madigan Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Feeco International Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Feeco International Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Feeco International Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.