Skip to content

· Public charity

Madav IX Foundation

Further the charitable, educational and religious purposes of the jewish federation of cleveland (federation).

$807k
Granted FY2020
19
Grants FY2020
4
States reached
$135k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

79% of Madav IX Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Jewish Federation Of Cleveland, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 2 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year Madav IX Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 16 organizations, $651k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

13
’18
14
’19
16
’20
1
’21
1
’22
5
’23
6
’24
2
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Philanthropy$2.8MReligion$1.3MEducation$391kHuman Services$180kFood & Nutrition$123kInternational$45kHealth$16kYouth Development$13kOther$0
02FY2020 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 19 grants below total $650,900, the rows itemized in this filing. The $806,900 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $156,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k5 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $216k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $401k
$18,700
Median grant
4
States reached
$20M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH FEDERATION OF CLEVELAND$135,000
GROSS SCHECHTER DAY SCHOOL$108,000
AISH HATORAH OF CLEVELAND$102,000
CHABAD JEWISH CENTER OF SOLON$56,000
HEBREW ACADEMY OF CLEVELAND$48,200
SEMACH SEDEK RIAS$28,000
JEWISH EDUCATION CENTER OF CLEVELAND$25,000
CLEVELAND CHABAD CHAI CENTER INC$23,500
TORAH HIGH OF CLEVELAND$20,000
FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF CLEVELAND$18,700
WAXMAN CHABAD CENTER$16,000
GOOD PEOPLE FUND INC$13,600
CHABAD OF DOWNTOWN CLEVELAND$12,000
CHABAD OF UNIVERSITY CIRCLE$11,000
KEHILLAS HAGRA$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 98% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%BAIS CHAYA INC: $60k → 13%COOLANU INC: $18k → 15%GOOD PEOPLE FUND INC: $18k → 16%PALM BEACH ORTHODOX SYNAGOGUE INC: $90k → 11%CHABAD JEWISH CENTER OF SOLON: $62k → 17%CHABAD JEWISH CENTER OF SOLON: $62k → 17%CHABAD JEWISH CENTER OF SOLON: $56k → 17%AISH HATORAH OF CLEVELAND: $102k → 17%AISH HATORAH OF CLEVELAND: $64k → 17%AISH HATORAH OF CLEVELAND: $64k → 17%HEBREW ACADEMY OF CLEVELAND: $56k → 17%HEBREW ACADEMY OF CLEVELAND: $55k → 17%HEBREW ACADEMY OF CLEVELAND: $54k → 17%HEBREW ACADEMY OF CLEVELAND: $48k → 17%HEBREW ACADEMY OF CLEVELAND: $37k → 17%JEWISH EDUCATION CENTER OF CLEVELAND: $32k → 17%JEWISH EDUCATION CENTER OF CLEVELAND: $27k → 17%JEWISH EDUCATION CENTER OF CLEVELAND: $25k → 17%TORAH HIGH OF CLEVELAND: $25k → 17%JEWISH EDUCATION CENTER OF CLEVELAND: $25k → 17%TORAH HIGH OF CLEVELAND: $25k → 17%JEWISH EDUCATION CENTER OF CLEVELAND: $21k → 17%TORAH HIGH OF CLEVELAND: $20k → 17%KEHILLAS HAGRA: $20k → 17%JEWISH FEDERATION OF CLEVELAND: $547k → 17%JEWISH FEDERATION OF CLEVELAND: $542k → 17%JEWISH FEDERATION OF CLEVELAND: $459k → 17%JEWISH FEDERATION OF CLEVELAND: $360k → 17%JEWISH FEDERATION OF CLEVELAND: $356k → 17%JEWISH FEDERATION OF CLEVELAND: $235k → 17%JEWISH FEDERATION OF CLEVELAND: $145k → 17%JEWISH FEDERATION OF CLEVELAND: $135k → 17%WAXMAN CHABAD CENTER: $16k → 17%WAXMAN CHABAD CENTER: $16k → 17%WAXMAN CHABAD CENTER: $16k → 17%SEMACH SEDEK RIAS: $180k → 17%JEWISH FAMILY EXPERIENCE: $80k → 17%SEMACH SEDEK RIAS: $55k → 17%SEMACH SEDEK RIAS: $40k → 17%SEMACH SEDEK RIAS: $28k → 17%JEWISH FAMILY EXPERIENCE: $18k → 17%GROSS SCHECHTER DAY SCHOOL: $108k → 17%GROSS SCHECHTER DAY SCHOOL: $108k → 17%CHABAD FAMILY CENTER: $90k → 17%CLEVELAND CHABAD CHAI CENTER INC: $24k → 17%CLEVELAND CHABAD CHAI CENTER INC: $24k → 17%CLEVELAND CHABAD CHAI CENTER INC: $24k → 17%FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF CLEVELAND: $19k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of Madav IX Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 95% of the giving stays in OH; by stated purpose, 81%.

Madav IX Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 14% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 15 repeat orgs$205k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2020, 1 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call). Read against FY2020, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
2

Total granted

$1.7M
$12k

Still filing today

33%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionInternationalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GS
    GROSS SCHECHTER DAY SCHOOL
    5× · 2018–2024 · $243k · revenue +37%
  • JE
    JEWISH EDUCATION CENTER OF CLEVELAND
    6× · 2018–2025 · $139k · revenue +79%
  • THE GOOD PEOPLE FUND INC
    3× · 2018–2020 · $45k · revenue +90%

Funded once

  • WR
    WESTERN RESERVE SYNAGOGUE BETH SHALOM
    one grant, 2019 · $7k
  • TE
    TEMPLE EMANU EL
    one grant, 2018 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Eastern European Jewish Heritage Foundation
Philanthropy
2
University of Judaism Foundation
—
3
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
4
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
5
Foundation for Conservative Judiasm of South Florida
—
6
The Jerusalem Connection
—
7
Jewish Life Foundation
—
8
Sherit Isroel
—
9
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
10
Chevras Shabbos Kodesh Podcast Fellowship
Religion
11
The Jewish Foundation of Cincinnati
Philanthropy
12
Torah Temimah Jerusalem

The school trains advanced talmudic scholars, enabling them to become high level teachers and religious leaders in israel and the united states using specific methodology combining traditional talmudic study with innovative learning…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Cleveland; the most unlike its peers is Chabad Bahia Blanca. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH FEDERATION OF CLEVELAND: $2,778,200 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF CLEVELAND+1 more: $27,000 · PhilanthropySEMACH SEDEK R I A S SYNAGOGUE: $303,000 · OtherSEMACH SEDEK R I A S SYNAGOGUEHEBREW ACADEMY OF CLEVELAND: $249,800 · OtherHEBREW ACADEMY OF CLEVELANDAISH HATORAH OF CLEVELAND: $230,000 · OtherAISH HATORAH OF CLEVELANDCHABAD JEWISH CENTER OF SOLON: $179,600 · OtherCHABAD JEWISH CENTER OF SOLONJEWISH FAMILY EXPERIENCE: $98,000 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY EXPERIENCECHABAD FAMILY CENTER: $96,000 · OtherCHABAD FAMILY CENTERPALM BEACH ORTHODOX SYNAGOGUE INC: $90,000 · OtherPALM BEACH ORTHODOX SYNAGOGUE INCCLEVELAND CHABAD CHAI CENTER INC: $77,700 · OtherYESHIVA HIGH SCHOOL OF CLEVELAND: $70,000 · OtherBAIS CHAYA INC: $60,000 · OtherCHABAD HOUSE OF CLEVELAND: $53,400 · Other+5 more: $94,350 · Other+5 moreGROSS SCHECHTER DAY SCHOOL: $243,250 · ReligionGROSS SCHE…JEWISH EDUCATION CENTER OF CLEVELAND: $138,625 · ReligionJEWISH EDU…FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF CLEVELAND INC: $41,700 · ReligionFRIENDSHIP…COOLANU INC MELNICK: $18,000 · Religion+2 more: $12,400 · ReligionTHE GOOD PEOPLE FUND INC: $44,800 · InternationalTRUE FAST OUTREACH MINISTRIES INC: $16,000 · Health
Philanthropy$2,805,200Other$1,601,850Religion$453,975International$44,800Health$16,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF CLEVELAND: $2,778,200 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetHEBREW ACADEMY OF CLEVELAND: $249,800 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetGROSS SCHECHTER DAY SCHOOL: $243,250 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetJEWISH EDUCATION CENTER OF CLEVELAND: $138,625 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetTHE GOOD PEOPLE FUND INC: $44,800 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetFRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF CLEVELAND INC: $41,700 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $27,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOOLANU INC MELNICK: $18,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTRUE FAST OUTREACH MINISTRIES INC: $16,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetCHABAD BAHIA BLANCA: $5,400 over 1y, 3.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF CLEVELAND ↗
  • Who funds HEBREW ACADEMY OF CLEVELAND ↗
  • Who funds GROSS SCHECHTER DAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH EDUCATION CENTER OF CLEVELAND ↗
  • Who funds THE GOOD PEOPLE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF CLEVELAND INC ↗
  • Who funds THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds COOLANU INC MELNICK ↗
  • Who funds TRUE FAST OUTREACH MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LEGACY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHABAD BAHIA BLANCA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Federation of ClevelandOH40.2× affinity17 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Federation of Cleveland · Jewish Education Center of Cleveland · The Joseph and Florence Mandel Family- Penni M and Stephen J Weinberg Family Fund · J David & Rebecca Heller Family Foundation · Irving I Stone Foundation · The Cleveland Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Madav IX Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Madav IX Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Madav IX Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Madav IX Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Madav IX’s filings →

    More from the funding graph