Skip to content
Madalynne L Peel Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Madalynne L Peel Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$177k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$51k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$627kEducation$328kHuman Services$222kAnimals$165kArts & Culture$142kPublic Safety & Disaster$113kRecreation & Sports$107kReligion$60kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $60k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $101k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OKLAHOMA MEDICAL RESEARCH FDN$50,500
NEWKIRK PUBLIC SCHOOLS$50,000
COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION OF KAY COUNTY$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
TONKAWA EDUCATION FOUNDATION$10,000
PONCA CITY EDUCATION FDN$10,000
NEWKIRK EDUCATION FOUNDATION$10,000
FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH OF NEWKIRK$8,100
FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH OF PONCA CITY$5,000
DAUGHTERS OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION$1,600
FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH OF NEWKIRK$1,000
PECKHAM CHRISTIAN CHURCH$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $98k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%MARLAND CHILDRENS HOME: $10k → 14%OPPORTUNITY CENTER: $40k → 16%OPPORTUNITY CENTER INC: $38k → 16%OPPORTUNITY CENTER: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 28 repeat orgs$448k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +6% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

28 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
29

Total granted

$1.6M
$438k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
0%

Still filing today

36%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesEmploymentAnimalsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation
    8× · 2018–2025 · $434k · revenue +49%
  • OC
    OPPORTUNITY CENTER INC
    3× · 2017–2020 · $88k · revenue +21%
  • HO
    HOSPICE OF NORTH CENTRAL OKLAHOMA
    7× · 2018–2024 · $58k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • VH
    Valley Hope Association Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $75k · revenue +283%
  • VH
    VALLEY HOPE OF CUSHING OKLAHOMA
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $37k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oklahoma Newspaper Foundation
Arts & Culture
2
Southwest Historical Foundation

To preserve and protect museum artifacts of the south central area of oklahoma

Arts & Culture
3
Claremore Museum of History Inc

To preserve the history of Claremore, Oklahoma

Arts & Culture
4
Will Rogers Memorial Foundation

Support Will Rogers Memorial Museums

Philanthropy
5
Oklahoma Music Hall of Fame and Museum Inc

Promote and recognize ok musicians

Arts & Culture
6
Oklahoma Aids Care Fund Inc

The Oklahoma AIDS Care Fund is a fundraising and advocacy organization dedicated to providing financial support and resources to HIV/AIDS service providers in the state of Oklahoma. Our goal is to reduce new infections, stigma, and health…

—
7
Masonic Charity Foundation of Oklahoma
Health
8
Oklahoma Heart Research and Education Foundation Inc
Health
9
Blackwell Oklahoma Community Foundation Inc
—
10
Northwest Oklahoma Blood Institute
—
11
Muskogee Medical Foundation

To raise and administer funds for the benefit of the health care needs of residents of muskogee, oklahoma, and its immediate surrounding area.

Human Services
12
Oklahoma Pharmacy Heritage Foundation Inc

Creation and maitenance of historical museum.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hospice of North Central Oklahoma; the most unlike its peers is American Legion Huff Minor Post 14. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/19
Grantees still filing
9/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEWKIRK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $111,272 · OtherNEWKIRK ELEMENTARY SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient: $100,850 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNEWKIRK PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $91,894 · OtherNEWKIRK PUBLIC SCHOOLSHOSPICE OF NORTH CENTRAL OKLAHOMA: $57,500 · OtherVALLEY HOPE OF CUSHING OKLAHOMA: $50,000 · OtherNEWKIRK EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $50,000 · OtherTONKAWA EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · OtherYMCA OF PONCA CITY: $40,000 · Other+39 more: $594,645 · Other+39 moreOklahoma Medical Research Foundation: $434,045 · HealthOklahoma Medical Research Fou…Valley Hope Association Foundation: $75,000 · HealthValley Hope Association Found…+1 more: $10,000 · HealthNORTHERN OKLAHOMA HUMANE SOCIETY: $165,000 · AnimalsNORTHERN …OPPORTUNITY CENTER INC: $87,500 · Human ServicesMARLAND CHILDRENS HOME INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF MARLAND'S GRAND HOME: $30,000 · Arts & CultureNEWKIRK MAIN STREET INC: $15,000 · Arts & CultureStanding Bear Native American Foundation Inc: $6,500 · Arts & CultureBlackwell Public School Foundation Inc: $20,000 · EducationSLC FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · Employment
Other$1,146,161Health$519,045Animals$165,000Human Services$97,500Arts & Culture$51,500Education$20,000Employment$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOklahoma Medical Research Foundation: $434,045 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHERN OKLAHOMA HUMANE SOCIETY: $165,000 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetOPPORTUNITY CENTER INC: $87,500 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetValley Hope Association Foundation: $75,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetHOSPICE OF NORTH CENTRAL OKLAHOMA: $57,500 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetPONCA CITY ART ASSOCIATION: $33,000 over 5y, 26% of budgetAMERICAN LEGION HUFF MINOR POST 14: $25,000 over 1y, 24% of budgetSURVIVOR RESOURCE NETWORK: $25,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetBlackwell Public School Foundation Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 9.9% of budgetNEW EMERGENCY RESOURCE AGENCY INC: $17,300 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetNEWKIRK MAIN STREET INC: $15,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetMARLAND CHILDRENS HOME INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION OF KAY COUNTY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetStanding Bear Native American Foundation Inc: $6,500 over 1y, 5.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN OKLAHOMA HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds OPPORTUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Valley Hope Association Foundation ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF NORTH CENTRAL OKLAHOMA ↗
  • Who funds PONCA CITY ART ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF MARLAND'S GRAND HOME ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN LEGION HUFF MINOR POST 14 ↗
  • Who funds SURVIVOR RESOURCE NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds Blackwell Public School Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds NEW EMERGENCY RESOURCE AGENCY INC ↗
  • Who funds SLC FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NEWKIRK MAIN STREET INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMP MCFADDEN INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Glenn W Peel Foundati…Evans Family Foundati…Marvin and Valoyce Mu…Keeler-Matthews Chari…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Glenn W Peel FoundationOK37× affinity15 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Glenn W Peel Foundation · Evans Family Foundation · Marvin and Valoyce Musgrove Family Charitable Foundation Inc · Keeler-Matthews Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Madalynne L Peel Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Madalynne L Peel Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 100%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 42%
  • Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation: 42% of income from government
  • Survivor Resource Network: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
10get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Madalynne L Peel Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Madalynne L Peel Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Madalynne L Peel’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home