Skip to content

· Private foundation

M Edward Morris Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$69k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Animals$214kEnvironment$74kEducation$34kReligion$30kInternational$30kHealth$29kCommunity Improvement$10kPhilanthropy$10k
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,750
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Animal Care Fund$9,000
Christian Appalachian Project Inc$6,000
College of New Jersey Fdn$6,000
Deborah Hospital Fdn$6,000
NJ Audubon Society$5,750
Appalachian Mountain Club$5,750
Sierra Club Fdn$5,750
National Wildlife Association$5,750
Capital Health Care System$5,000
Animal Welfare Association$5,000
Oasis Animal Sanctuary$4,000
Associated Humane Societies Inc$4,000
SAVE-A Friend to Homeless Animals$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Christian Appalachian Project Inc: $6k → 15%Christian Appalachian Project Inc: $6k → 15%Christian Appalachian Project Inc: $6k → 15%Christian Appalachian Project Inc: $5k → 15%Christian Appalachian Project Inc: $4k → 15%Christian Appalachian Project Inc: $3k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 10% of M Edward Morris Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

M Edward Morris Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$412k · 13 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
1

Total granted

$412k
$10k

Still filing today

85%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsEnvironmentEducationHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    ANIMAL CARE SANCTUARY
    6× · 2019–2024 · $44k · revenue +79%
  • New Jersey Audubon Society
    6× · 2019–2024 · $36k · revenue +11%
  • Appalachian Mountain Club
    6× · 2019–2024 · $36k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • PA
    Princeton Area Community
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Animal Care and Control of New York City Inc

Animal care centers of nyc's (acc) mission is to end animal homelessness in nyc.

Animals
2
The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The aspca's mission, as stated by founder henry bergh in 1866, is "to provide effective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the united states." the aspca was founded on the belief that animals are entitled to kind and…

Animals
3
All About Animals Rescue

All about animals rescue's mission is no more homeless pets.

Animals
4
Albemarle Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Inc

To advance the humane treatment of dogs and cats by providing comprehensive sheltering, medical care, and behavioral support. we strive to ensure every animal has the opportunity to find a permanent, loving home through community education…

Animals
5
Ark-Valley Humane Society Inc

Ark-Valley Humane Society's (AVHS) Mission is ensuring the welfare of companion animals through compassion and care. AVHS operated an open-admission animal shelter for Chaffee County, Colorado.

Animals
6
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
7
Animal Humane Society

Animal Humane Society (AHS) established in 1878 and incorporated as a nonprofit charitable organization in 1891 works to engage the hearts, hands, and minds of the community to help animals. AHS's vision is to compassionately and…

Animals
8
Connecticut Humane Society

The connecticut humane society is the leading resource in the state for companion animal welfare, enriching the lives of families and communities through adoption services, medical care, education, and prevention of cruelty.

Animals
9
The Humane Society of Austin & Travis County Inc

The austin humane society (ahs) offers comprehensive, humane, life-saving animal services, transforming the lives of animals and those who love them. because we believe homeless animals deserve a chance to thrive in a loving environment,…

Animals
10
New Hampshire Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To save the lives of animals through rescue, rehabilitation and adoption; to promote learning, eliminate animal cruelty and be a leader in advancing the highest standards in animal welfare.

Animals
11
Auburn Valley Humane Society

Auburn valley humane society enriches the lives of companion animals and people through animal sheltering, programs, services and community engagement

Animals
12
Alley Cat Rescue Inc

ACRs programs promote better care for community cats through trap-neuter-return. Local programs include placing unwanted cats in new homes, running a low-cost spay/neuter clinic, and providing support for local feral cat caretakers.…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Save a Friend to Homeless Animals; the most unlike its peers is Associated Humane Societies Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ANIMAL CARE SANCTUARY: $44,000 · AnimalsANIMAL CARE SANCTUARYAnimal Welfare Association Inc: $39,000 · AnimalsAnimal Welfare Association IncTHE OASIS ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC: $36,000 · AnimalsTHE OASIS ANIMAL SANCTUARY INCASSOCIATED HUMANE SOCIETIES INC: $15,000 · AnimalsASSOCIATED HUMANE SOCIETIES INCSAVE A FRIEND TO HOMELESS ANIMALS: $10,000 · AnimalsSAVE A FRIEND TO HOMELESS ANIMALSSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $37,750 · EnvironmentSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATIONNew Jersey Audubon Society: $36,250 · EnvironmentNew Jersey Audubon SocietyAppalachian Mountain Club: $36,250 · EnvironmentAppalachian Mountain ClubNational Wildlife Association: $33,750 · OtherNational Wildlife A…Capital Health Care System: $29,000 · OtherCapital Health Care…Princeton Area Community: $10,000 · OtherPrinceton Area Comm…THE COLLEGE OF NEW JERSEY FOUNDATION INC: $34,450 · EducationTHE COLLE…CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC: $30,450 · Human ServicesDEBORAH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $30,100 · HealthCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NEW JERSEY: $10,000 · Philanthropy
Animals$144,000Environment$110,250Other$72,750Education$34,450Human Services$30,450Health$30,100Philanthropy$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetANIMAL CARE SANCTUARY: $44,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetAnimal Welfare Association Inc: $39,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $37,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNew Jersey Audubon Society: $36,250 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetAppalachian Mountain Club: $36,250 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE OASIS ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC: $36,000 over 6y, 8.5% of budgetTHE COLLEGE OF NEW JERSEY FOUNDATION INC: $34,450 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC: $30,450 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDEBORAH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $30,100 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetASSOCIATED HUMANE SOCIETIES INC: $15,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSAVE A FRIEND TO HOMELESS ANIMALS: $10,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NEW JERSEY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ANIMAL CARE SANCTUARY ↗
  • Who funds Animal Welfare Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds New Jersey Audubon Society ↗
  • Who funds Appalachian Mountain Club ↗
  • Who funds THE OASIS ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE COLLEGE OF NEW JERSEY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds DEBORAH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATED HUMANE SOCIETIES INC ↗
  • Who funds SAVE A FRIEND TO HOMELESS ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NEW JERSEY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

1992 Tipgoomoogus Memorial TrustMO13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: 1992 Tipgoomoogus Memorial Trust · Petsmart Charities Inc · Chubb Charitable Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization M Edward Morris Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from M Edward Morris Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Appalachian Mountain Club: 1% of income from government
  • New Jersey Audubon Society: 1% of income from government
  • The College of New Jersey Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to M Edward Morris Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to M Edward Morris Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on M Edward Morris’ filings →

More from the funding graph