Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

1992 Tipgoomoogus Memorial Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$145k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Animals$507kEducation$408kHousing & Shelter$35kEnvironment$5kHuman Services$1k
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $133k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOL OF VET$12,500
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOL OF VET$12,500
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOL OF VET$11,875
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOL OF VET$11,875
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOL OF VET$11,875
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOL OF VET$11,875
ANIMAL WELFARE ASSOCIATION INC$10,000
NYC SECOND CHANCE RESCUE$10,000
HOMEWARD BOUND PET ADOPTION CENTER$10,000
THE 11TH HOUR ANIMAL RESCUE INC$10,000
BEST FRIEND DOG AND ANIMAL ADOPTION$10,000
ANIMAL CARE FUND$10,000
OASIS ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC$7,500
BLUEPATH SERVICE DOGS$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 68% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ANIMAL CARE SANCTUARY: $8k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOL OF: $65k → 22%NO STRAY LEFT BEHIND: $10k → 10%AQUARIUM OF THE PACIFIC: $5k → 14%BLUEPATH SERVICE DOGS: $5k → 9%NYC SECOND CHANCE RESCUE: $10k → 13%FRIENDS OF THE STOKES SHELTER INC: $5k → 11%PASSION FOR PAWS: $10k → 16%FOR BULLIES SAKE BULLY BREED RESCUE: $5k → 18%MT PLEASANT ANIMAL SHELTER INC: $5k → 4%SAVE - A FRIEND TO HOMELESS: $5k → 5%CASTLE OF DREAMS ANIMAL RESCUE: $10k → 6%LAWNS TO LAPS CAT RESCUE: $5k → 7%OASIS ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC: $8k → 8%CENTRAL JERSEY ANIMAL RESCUE: $5k → 8%BEST FRIEND DOG AND ANIMAL ADOPTION: $10k → 10%RESCUE RIDGE: $5k → 11%RISE AGAIN ANIMAL RESCUE: $5k → 11%ANIMAL WELFARE ASSOCIATION: $15k → 12%LAWNS TO LAPS CAT RESCUE: $5k → 14%ANIMAL CARE FUND: $10k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOL OF VET: $13k → 22%NO STRAY LEFT BEHIND: $10k → 10%CASTLE OF DREAMS ANIMAL RESCUE: $10k → 6%OASIS ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC: $8k → 8%BEST FRIEND DOG AND ANIMAL ADOPTION INC: $10k → 10%ANIMAL WELFARE ASSOCIATION INC: $11k → 12%ANIMAL CARE FUND: $10k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOL OF VET: $13k → 22%NO STRAY LEFT BEHIND: $10k → 10%THE 11TH HOUR ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $10k → 4%CASTLE OF DREAMS ANIMAL RESCUE: $10k → 6%OASIS ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC: $7k → 8%LOVING HANDS CAT RESCUE INC: $8k → 10%ANIMAL WELFARE ASSOCIATION INC: $10k → 12%ANIMAL CARE FUND: $9k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOL OF VET: $12k → 22%THE 11TH HOUR ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $10k → 4%CASTLE OF DREAMS ANIMAL RESCUE: $7k → 6%ANIMAL WELFARE ASSOCIATION INC: $7k → 12%ANIMAL CARE FUND: $9k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOL OF VET: $12k → 22%CASTLE OF DREAMS ANIMAL RESCUE A NJ: $10k → 6%HOMEWARD BOUND PET ADOPTION CENTER: $10k → 12%ANIMAL CARE FUND: $7k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOL OF VET: $12k → 22%SHORE SAVES: $8k → 6%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOL OF VET: $12k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
IL
NY
PA
NJ
CA
DE
NC
SC
MS

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$611k · 19 repeat orgs$344k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
24

Total granted

$611k
$319k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
0%

Still filing today

63%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    ANIMAL CARE SANCTUARY
    6× · 2019–2025 · $53k · revenue +79%
  • TO
    THE OASIS ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $34k · revenue +24%
  • NS
    No Stray Left Behind
    3× · 2019–2021 · $30k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIV OF PENN SCHOOL OF VETERINARY
    one grant, 2023 · $70k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOL OF
    one grant, 2019 · $65k
  • MW
    MARIANNA WU CO UNIVERSITY OF
    one grant, 2020 · $22k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hope Fur Paws Rescue

To help injured, abandoned and unwanted animals. We provide food, vet care that includes heartworm prevention and spay or neuter services, shelter and anything else needed.

Animals
2
Animal Rescue and Adoption Agency Inc

An animal rescue/adoption Agency. Rescued animals are from kill shelters or owner surrenders facing hardship then rehabbed/medical completed while in foster care then adopted into loving homes.

Animals
3
Paws Animal Rescue Center

To help rescue unwanted pets

Animals
4
Shelters and Shelves Rescue Inc

foster based dog rescue working with shelters to save dogs

Animals
5
Paws and Claws Animal Shelter
Animals
6
Paws and Claws Animal Welfare Society Inc

Animal Rescue

Animals
7
Fur Animal Rescue

Animal rescue organization dedicated to finding homes for animals at the animal shelter. we also provde vet care foster homes, and assistance with homing for special needs animals.

Animals
8
Runaways Animal Rescue
Animals
9
Anas Safe Haven Rescue Inc

Animal Welfare

Animals
10
Radnor Outreach & Animal Rescue

Provide animal rescue with humane education and outreach.

Animals
11
Raskels Rescue
Animals
12
Happy Acres Pet Rescue
Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Save a Friend to Homeless Animals and the most unlike its peers is Rise Again Animal Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 14 years old; the field is 19. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%4%<5yr13%31%5–10yr19%23%10–20yr17%31%20–35yr15%4%35–55yr17%8%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%2%<5yr13%28%5–10yr19%21%10–20yr17%36%20–35yr15%2%35–55yr17%11%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/27
the rest of the field
9%
7,129/78,135

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/26
Grantees still filing
12/26
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOL OF VET — $142,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOL OF VETUNIV OF PENN SCHOOL OF VETERINARY — $70,000 · OtherUNIV OF PENN SCHOOL OF VETERINARYUNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOL OF — $65,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOL OFJULIA BARNHART CO UNIVERSITY OF — $42,650 · OtherJULIA BARNHART CO UNIVERSITY OFSAVE - A FRIEND TO HOMELESS — $25,000 · OtherMARIANNA WU CO UNIVERSITY OF — $21,675 · OtherCHANDLER NAVARA CO UNIVERSITY OF — $21,675 · OtherMARIANA WU CO UNIVERSITY OF — $21,000 · OtherANGELINE GANO CO UNIVERSITY OF — $21,000 · OtherDAYANA PEREZ-BONILLA CO UNIVERSITY OF — $20,000 · Other+10 more — $79,000 · Other+10 moreANIMAL CARE SANCTUARY — $52,500 · AnimalsANIMAL CARE SANCTUARYCASTLE OF DREAMS ANIMAL RESCUE A NJ — $47,000 · AnimalsCASTLE OF DREAMS ANIMAL RESCUE A NJAnimal Welfare Association Inc — $42,500 · AnimalsAnimal Welfare Association IncTHE OASIS ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC — $34,000 · AnimalsTHE OASIS ANIMAL SANCTUARY INCNo Stray Left Behind — $30,000 · AnimalsNo Stray Left BehindTHE 11TH HOUR ANIMAL RESCUE INC T/A ELEVENTH HOUR ANIMAL RESCUE — $20,000 · AnimalsFriends of the Stokes County Shelter Inc — $20,000 · AnimalsBest Friend Dog & Animal Adoption Inc — $20,000 · AnimalsLAWNS TO LAPS CAT RESCUE — $20,000 · AnimalsHome For Good Dog Rescue Inc — $17,500 · AnimalsShore Saves — $15,000 · Animals+14 more — $106,000 · Animals+14 moreMOONLIT PINES — $1,000 · Human Services
Other$529,500Animals$424,500Human Services$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetANIMAL CARE SANCTUARY — $52,500 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetCASTLE OF DREAMS ANIMAL RESCUE A NJ — $47,000 over 5y, 6.1% of budgetAnimal Welfare Association Inc — $42,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTHE OASIS ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC — $34,000 over 6y, 4.5% of budgetTHE 11TH HOUR ANIMAL RESCUE INC T/A ELEVENTH HOUR ANIMAL RESCUE — $20,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetFriends of the Stokes County Shelter Inc — $20,000 over 4y, 4.1% of budgetBest Friend Dog & Animal Adoption Inc — $20,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetLAWNS TO LAPS CAT RESCUE — $20,000 over 4y, 39% of budgetHome For Good Dog Rescue Inc — $17,500 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetShore Saves — $15,000 over 2y, 8.6% of budgetFORGOTTEN CATS INC — $10,300 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSUPER HEROES IN RIPPED JEANS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetRISE AGAIN ANIMAL RESCUE — $10,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetMT PLEASANT ANIMAL SHELTER INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetLANCASTER SPCA — $7,500 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetLoving Hands Cat Rescue Inc — $7,500 over 1y, 12% of budgetDREAMING OF A CHANCE FARM ANIMAL SANCTUARY CORP — $5,700 over 1y, 17% of budgetWise Animal Rescue — $5,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetRESCUE RIDGE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSAVE A FRIEND TO HOMELESS ANIMALS — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBLUEPATH SERVICE DOGS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAQUARIUM OF THE PACIFIC CORPORATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ANIMAL CARE SANCTUARY
  • Who funds CASTLE OF DREAMS ANIMAL RESCUE A NJ
  • Who funds Animal Welfare Association Inc
  • Who funds THE OASIS ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC
  • Who funds No Stray Left Behind
  • Who funds THE 11TH HOUR ANIMAL RESCUE INC T/A ELEVENTH HOUR ANIMAL RESCUE
  • Who funds Friends of the Stokes County Shelter Inc
  • Who funds Best Friend Dog & Animal Adoption Inc
  • Who funds LAWNS TO LAPS CAT RESCUE
  • Who funds Home For Good Dog Rescue Inc
  • Who funds Shore Saves
  • Who funds FORGOTTEN CATS INC
  • Who funds SUPER HEROES IN RIPPED JEANS INC
  • Who funds RISE AGAIN ANIMAL RESCUE
  • Who funds HOMEWARD BOUND PET ADOPTION CENTER INC
  • Who funds MT PLEASANT ANIMAL SHELTER INC
  • Who funds PASSION FOR PAWS
  • Who funds LANCASTER SPCA
  • Who funds Loving Hands Cat Rescue Inc
  • Who funds DREAMING OF A CHANCE FARM ANIMAL SANCTUARY CORP
  • Who funds Wise Animal Rescue

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Furniss N W Chr TrMO24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Furniss N W Chr Tr · Petsmart Charities Inc · Bristol-Myers Squibb Foundation Inc · The Duffield Family Foundation Dba Maddie's Fund · American Express Foundation · Chubb Charitable Foundation · Joseph Robert Foundation Inc · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · Pedigree Foundation · Petco Love · Greater Good Charities · Verizon Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization 1992 Tipgoomoogus Memorial Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 90%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 4%
  • Rescue Ridge6% of income from government
  • Forgotten Cats Inc4% of income from government
  • The 11TH Hour Animal Rescue Inc T/a Eleventh Hour Animal Rescue0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph