Skip to content

· Private foundation

M D Close Foundation aka Melvin D Close Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$338k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$101k
Largest
01What it funds
0174% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$228kHealth$89kEducation$82kInternational$7kCommunity Improvement$7kArts & Culture$5kFood & Nutrition$3kHuman Services$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $143k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $182k
$20,375
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LDS - Desert Road Ward$101,375
UCI Foundation$81,000
American Heart Association$35,500
St Judes Children Research$35,500
LDS - Lakeview 7th Ward$20,375
Individual grant recipient$20,375
LDS - Porter Park Ward$20,375
LDS - Sun Valley Ward$11,293
Individual grant recipient$7,200
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,400
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Family to Family Connection: $200 → 13%Living Grace Home: $100 → 13%Living Grace Homes: $100 → 13%Beashero Foundation: $300 → 13%Beashero Foundation: $300 → 13%BE A SHERO Foundation: $250 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MA
NV
CA
UT
VA
MD
AZ
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

52%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$265k · 21 repeat orgs$248k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +60% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
34

Total granted

$265k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%
+26%

Still filing today

38%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 33% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $226k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationHealthInternationalFood & NutritionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    3× · 2019–2024 · $37k · revenue +43%
  • RESULTS EDUCATIONAL FUND INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $6k · revenue +60%
  • TS
    THREE SQUARE
    5× · 2017–2021 · $2k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • LC
    LDS - Corporate Office Head Quarter
    one grant, 2021 · $7k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • SJ
    St Jude Children's Research Hospita
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition

The mission of the global alliance for improved nutrition (gain) is to improve the consumption of healthier diets for all, especially the most vulnerable, by improving the availability, affordability, desirability, and sustainability of…

Food & Nutrition
2
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
3
Mary's Meals Usa Inc

To raise donations to (i) provide a daily meal in a place of education for children in the world's poorest communities; (ii) occasionally provide relief for those suffering, in any part of the world, as a result of humanitarian crises…

International
4
Guttmacher Institute Inc

The institute is a leading research and policy organization committed to advancing sexual and reproductive health and rights in the united states and globally.

—
5
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
6
Health Poverty Action Usa

Health Poverty Action USA acts in solidarity with health workers, activists & communities worldwide to improve health & challenge the causes of poverty. We do this in 3 distinct ways: 1. We approach health as an issue of social justice. We…

International
7
Land O'lakes VENTURE37

To replace poverty with prosperity by implementing donor-funded projects that provide global humanitarian aid to communities and individuals in developing countries through in-kind, financial and technical assistance.

International
8
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
9
Charity Global Inc

Charity: water is a non-profit organization bringing clean and safe water to people around the world. continued on schedule o.

Human Services
10
Women's Refugee Commission Inc

To improve the lives and protect the rights of women, children and youth displaced by conflict and crisis. the women's refugee commission envisions a world in which refugees are safe, healthy and reliant and seeks to drive change in…

Human Services
11
Researchamerica

2025 was a turbulent year for the medical and health research community, but our commitment to advocating for science never wavered. from pushing back against funding threats to elevating researchers' voices and equipping advocates, we…

—
12
San Francisco Food Bank

To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Results Educational Fund Inc; the most unlike its peers is Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
17/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LDS - Desert Road Ward: $101,375 · OtherLDS - Desert Road WardLDS - Lakeview 7th Ward: $57,875 · OtherLDS - Lakeview 7th WardLDS - Sun Valley Ward: $48,387 · OtherLDS - Sun Valley WardSt Judes Children Research: $39,500 · OtherSt Judes Children ResearchIndividual grant recipient: $26,050 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $20,375 · OtherLDS - Porter Park Ward: $20,375 · Other+37 more: $69,875 · Other+37 moreUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION: $81,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CALIF…RESULTS EDUCATIONAL FUND INC: $6,250 · EducationRESULTS EDUCATIONAL…+1 more: $100 · EducationAmerican Heart Association Inc: $36,500 · Health+2 more: $200 · HealthTHREE SQUARE: $1,900 · Food & NutritionFeeding America: $100 · Food & NutritionBE A SHERO FOUNDATION: $850 · Human ServicesLAS VEGAS RESCUE MISSION: $250 · Human ServicesLIVING GRACE HOMESINC: $200 · Human ServicesFAMILY TO FAMILY ISD 13: $200 · Human ServicesNEVADA PUBLIC RADIO: $885 · Arts & CultureGRAMEEN FOUNDATION USA: $300 · InternationalHands Together Inc: $200 · InternationalCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $100 · International
Other$383,812Education$87,350Health$36,700Food & Nutrition$2,000Human Services$1,500Arts & Culture$885International$600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION: $81,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $36,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRESULTS EDUCATIONAL FUND INC: $6,250 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHREE SQUARE: $1,900 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNEVADA PUBLIC RADIO: $885 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBE A SHERO FOUNDATION: $850 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetVOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA UTAH: $700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUTAH FOOD BANK: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGRAMEEN FOUNDATION USA: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLAS VEGAS RESCUE MISSION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHands Together Inc: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIVING GRACE HOMESINC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY TO FAMILY ISD 13: $200 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSolar Cookers International: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBread For The World Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEVADA LAS VEGAS FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI National: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds RESULTS EDUCATIONAL FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds THREE SQUARE ↗
  • Who funds NEVADA PUBLIC RADIO ↗
  • Who funds BE A SHERO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA UTAH ↗
  • Who funds UTAH FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds GRAMEEN FOUNDATION USA ↗
  • Who funds LAS VEGAS RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds Hands Together Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY10.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization M D Close Foundation aka Melvin D Close Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from M D Close Foundation aka Melvin D Close Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to M D Close Foundation aka Melvin D Close Foundation?

Find your warmest path to M D Close Foundation aka Melvin D Close Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 60 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on M D Close Foundation aka Melvin D Close’s filings →

More from the funding graph