Skip to content

Illinois · Private foundation

M & J Eisenberg Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$14k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
3
Grants FY2024
4
Organizations funded FY2023
0%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$2,500
Largest grant, FY2024
$10,000
Organizations funded a year
4 to 33
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
1
Total assets, FY2024
$46k
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 0% of the organizations M & J Eisenberg Family Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’22’23
EducationArts & CulturePhilanthropyCivil RightsFood & NutritionInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving3$14k100%
FY20234$1k0%
FY202214$28k57%
FY201916$20k56%
FY201833$39k85%
FY201711$12kn/a
83% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$24kCivil Rights$19kArts & Culture$18kPhilanthropy$11kRecreation & Sports$5kHealth$4kSocial Science$3kCommunity Improvement$2kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
American Jewish Committee$17,50030%
The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum$10,25020%
College Possible Inc$10,00010%
Jewish United Fund of Metropolitan Chicago$5,65030%
Enchanted Backpack$5,45030%
Cristo Rey Jesuit High School$5,0001n/a
Mid-North Association$4,0001n/a
Friends of Prentice$3,00011%
University of Chicago$2,50010%
Goldie B Wolfe Miller Women Leaders in Real Estate Initiative$1,45820%
Show all 28 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 31 recipients with no EIN on record ($41k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget M & J Eisenberg Family Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAmerican Jewish Committee: $17,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $10,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCollege Possible Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJewish United Fund of Metropolitan Chicago: $5,650 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEnchanted Backpack: $5,450 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of Prentice: $3,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGoldie B Wolfe Miller Women Leaders in Real Estate Initiative: $1,458 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetUrban Growers Collective Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Friends of Leket Israel Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAnti-Defamation League: $950 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Civil Liberties Union Foundation Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Friends of Hebrew University Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWorld Jewish Congress (American Section) Inc: $432 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEvanston Township High School District 202 Ed Foundation: $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLandmarks Preservation Council of Illinois: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDaniel Murphy Scholarship Fund: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBlood Cancer United Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWindow to the World Communications Inc: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHistorical Assoc of South Haven: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYosemite Foundation: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Cradle Foundation: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Chicago Bar Foundation: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Chicago Bar Association: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 24.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL20.3× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · The Robert Thomas Bobins Foundation · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare M & J Eisenberg Family Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to M & J Eisenberg Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to M & J Eisenberg Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About M & J Eisenberg Family Foundation

How much does M & J Eisenberg Family Foundation give?
M & J Eisenberg Family Foundation reported 3 grants totaling $13,500 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 4 and 33 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does M & J Eisenberg Family Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Education (21%), Civil Rights (17%), Arts & Culture (16%).
Who are M & J Eisenberg Family Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: American Jewish Committee ($18k), The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ($10k), College Possible Inc ($10k).
Does M & J Eisenberg Family Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does M & J Eisenberg Family Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as M & J Eisenberg Family Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The Chicago Community Trust, The Robert Thomas Bobins Foundation, Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago.
Where is M & J Eisenberg Family Foundation based?
M & J Eisenberg Family Foundation is based in IL.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on M & J Eisenberg Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph