· Private foundation
Lynne Cooper Harvey Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $1k
- $10k–50k22 grants · $368k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $350k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PETA | $100,000 |
| Feltsman Piano Foundation Ltd | $100,000 |
| Farm Sanctuary | $50,000 |
| Animal Care League | $50,000 |
| PAWS Chicago | $50,000 |
| Operation Blessing International | $40,000 |
| Oracle Piano Society | $35,000 |
| Hillsdale College | $25,000 |
| Frieds Cat Shelter | $25,000 |
| John Brown University | $20,000 |
| Musicians Club of Women | $17,500 |
| 600 Million Stray Dogs | $15,000 |
| Performing Animal Welfare Society | $15,000 |
| Animal Rescue Inc | $15,000 |
| Cats Cradle of the Shenandoah Valle | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 89% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +32% for the ones you funded once.
25 repeat relationships — 25 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ACANIMAL CARE LEAGUE5× · 2021–2025 · $525k · revenue +51%
- PFPEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC5× · 2021–2025 · $500k · revenue +82%
- PCPAWS CHICAGO5× · 2021–2025 · $300k · revenue +84%
Funded once
- TSTHE SALVATION ARMYone grant, 2021 · $30k
- HAHOOVED ANIMAL HUMANE SOCIETYgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue +32%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
All about animals rescue's mission is no more homeless pets.
The animal haven's misson is to provide a temporary, safe, caring and humane refuge for homeless dogs and cats and place these animals in quality adoptive homes.
The organization is a no-kill animal rescue. paws saves lives and prevents suffering by implementing the no-kill philosophy through aggressive spay/neuter programs for owned and unowned animals. this is accomplished by rescuing, fostering,…
The aspca's mission, as stated by founder henry bergh in 1866, is "to provide effective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the united states." the aspca was founded on the belief that animals are entitled to kind and…
The mission is to protect and care for homeless animals in the Dillon and Beaverhead county area.
A sanctuary for unfortunate animals
We opened up our clinic and through the low-cost wellness we provided, we kept approximately 14,600 dogs in their homes which means they werent in shelters, the streets, or being rehomed in 2024 and provided access to low-cost care to…
HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS INTERNATIONAL, FKA HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL (HSI), works around the globe to promote the human-animal bond, rescue and protect dogs and cats, improve farm animal welfare, protect wildlife, promote animal-free…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Save-a-Pet Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Rolling Dog Farm. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ANIMAL CARE LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC ↗
- Who funds PAWS CHICAGO ↗
- Who funds FARM SANCTUARY INC ↗
- Who funds Operation Blessing International Relief and Development Corporation ↗
- Who funds ORACLE PIANO SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds Frieds Cat Shelter Inc ↗
- Who funds MUSICIANS CLUB OF WOMEN ↗
- Who funds Assisi Animal Clinics Of Virginia Inc ↗
- Who funds The Fund for Animals Inc ↗
- Who funds SAVE-A-PET INC ↗
- Who funds TREE HOUSE HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds ANIMAL RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds PERFORMING ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds CAT'S CRADLE OF THE SHENANDOAH VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds MIKEROWEWORKS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE ROLLING DOG FARM ↗
- Who funds WOLF CONSERVATION CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ON ANGELS WINGS INC ↗
- Who funds CATNAP FROM THE HEART ↗
- Who funds Arizona Humane Society ↗
- Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds JOHN BROWN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds HOOVED ANIMAL HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: AbbVie Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Petsmart Charities Inc · Muntwyler Wanda Char 0 Main · Petco Love · The Duffield Family Foundation Dba Maddie's Fund · Baxter International Foundation · Greater Good Charities · Network for Good · Shell USA Company Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Chubb Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Lynne Cooper Harvey Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.