Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lydia and Doug Shorenstein Foundation Inc

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.0M
Granted FY2021
25
Grants FY2021
4
States reached
$1.0M
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

97% of Lydia and Doug Shorenstein Foundation Inc’s FY2022 grant dollars went to The San Francisco Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2022 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2021, the last year Lydia and Doug Shorenstein Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 11 organizations, $2M. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

5
’19
13
’20
11
’21
1
’22

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2022.

Philanthropy$3.5MHealth$3.1MEducation$662kArts & Culture$553kInternational$415kReligion$250kHuman Services$205kRecreation & Sports$10kOther$0
02FY2021 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k10 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $130k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $550k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.3M
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION$1,000,000
PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE$250,000
SAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART$150,000
CONGREGATION EMANU-EL$100,000
JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDRENS SERVICES$100,000
AMERICAN JEWISH JOINT DISTRIBUTION COMMITTEE INC$100,000
SAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART$50,000
CONGREGATION EMANU-EL$50,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL P ORCHESTRA$25,000
SAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART$25,000
STANFORD UNIVERSITY$25,000
SAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART$25,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY INC$10,000
JEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL OF SF$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–21, $203k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%REIMAGINE INC: $3k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDRENS SERVICES: $100k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDRENS SERVICES: $100k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.3M · 10 repeat orgs$63k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2021, 1 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call). Read against FY2021, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
4

Total granted

$4.3M
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+138%

Still filing today

80%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22
Arts & CultureInternationalEducationRecreation & SportsHealthEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION
    4× · 2019–2022 · $3.1M · revenue +51%
  • The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc
    3× · 2019–2021 · $400k · revenue +24%
  • BI
    BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION
    2× · 2020–2021 · $15k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • RF
    REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +165%
  • BA
    Bay Area Jewish Healing Center
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue -100%
  • RI
    REIMAGINE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +138%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sandler Foundation

The foundation operates exclusively for charitable, educational or religious purposes by conducting or supporting activities for the benefit of, or to carry out the purposes of the jewish community federation of san francisco, the…

Philanthropy
2
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
3
San Francisco Jewish Community Publications Inc

(continued from page 1) nationally and internationally. Further, J seeks to enrich the cultural, religious and social life of the community through its articles, interviews and features.

Education
4
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
5
American Friends of Hebrew University Inc

Support the hebrew univ. of jerusalem, israel's foremost center of higher edu. & research.

International
6
President-Board of Trustees Santa Clara College

Scu is a catholic and jesuit institution that makes student learning its central focus, promotes faculty and staff learning in its various forms, and exhibits organizational learning.

Education
7
Uc Santa Barbara Foundation

The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…

Education
8
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
9
Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles

We steward $1.5 billion in charitable assets through donor-advised funds, endowments, and other giving vehicles. partnering with 1,400 individuals, families, and organizations, we build enduring legacies and multigenerational impact. in…

Philanthropy
10
University of California Irvine Foundation

The mission of the university of california, irvine foundation (uc irvine foundation) is to raise and manage private funds to support uc irvine's broader mission of excellence in teaching, research and public service. to this end, the uc…

Education
11
Jewish Federation of San Diego County

Jewish federation of san diego county is dedicated to building a vibrant, caring, connected, and enduring jewish community.

—
12
Jewish Federation of the Sacra

To serve and enrich the Jewish community and those who support and identify with it, in the greater Sacramento area, Israel, and the world.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The San Francisco Foundation; the most unlike its peers is San Francisco Museum of Modern Art. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
17/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $3,126,548 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATIONPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $550,000 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Harvard College+2 more: $101,800 · EducationTHE SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $3,446,947 · PhilanthropyTHE SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION+1 more: $2,500 · PhilanthropySAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART: $470,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $8,000 · Arts & CultureThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $400,000 · InternationalBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $15,000 · International+1 more: $10,000 · InternationalCONGREGATION EMANU-EL: $250,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL PHILHARMONIC ORCHES: $50,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL P ORCHESTRA: $25,000 · Other+5 more: $40,300 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $200,000 · Human Services+1 more: $2,500 · Human ServicesSPORTS HUMANITARIAN GROUP INC: $10,000 · Recreation & Sports
Education$3,778,348Philanthropy$3,449,447Arts & Culture$478,000International$425,000Other$365,300Human Services$202,500Recreation & Sports$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $3,446,947 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $3,126,548 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $550,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART: $470,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $400,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $200,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $100,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSPORTS HUMANITARIAN GROUP INC: $10,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican Friends of Tel Aviv Univ: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAIRTOSTAY: $10,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetGREENBELT ALLIANCEPEOPLE FOR OPEN SPACE: $7,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetJewish Film Institute: $7,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBay Area Jewish Healing Center: $2,800 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetREIMAGINE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Commmunity High School of the Bay: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGRABHORN INSTITUTE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & SonomaCA17.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · John Pritzker Family Fund · Lisa & Douglas Goldman Fund · Marin Community Foundation · Lisa Stone Pritzker Family Fund · The San Francisco Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lydia and Doug Shorenstein Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lydia and Doug Shorenstein Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Lydia and Doug Shorenstein Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Lydia and Doug Shorenstein Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lydia and Doug Shorenstein’s filings →

More from the funding graph