· Private foundation
Lydia and Doug Shorenstein Foundation Inc
Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Read this first · the figures below need context
97% of Lydia and Doug Shorenstein Foundation Inc’s FY2022 grant dollars went to The San Francisco Foundation, not to grantees.
Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2022 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2021, the last year Lydia and Doug Shorenstein Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 11 organizations, $2M. It is dated, not current.
Organizations named directly on the return
Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2022.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2021
- Under $10k10 grants · $37k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $130k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $550k
- $250k+2 grants · $1.3M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION | $1,000,000 |
| PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE | $250,000 |
| SAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART | $150,000 |
| CONGREGATION EMANU-EL | $100,000 |
| JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDRENS SERVICES | $100,000 |
| AMERICAN JEWISH JOINT DISTRIBUTION COMMITTEE INC | $100,000 |
| SAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART | $50,000 |
| CONGREGATION EMANU-EL | $50,000 |
| SAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART | $25,000 |
| STANFORD UNIVERSITY | $25,000 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL P ORCHESTRA | $25,000 |
| SAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART | $25,000 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY INC | $10,000 |
| JEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL OF SF | $10,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–21, $203k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
10 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2021, 1 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call). Read against FY2021, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION4× · 2019–2022 · $3.1M · revenue +51%
The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc3× · 2019–2021 · $400k · revenue +24%- BIBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION2× · 2020–2021 · $15k · revenue +19%
Funded once
- RFREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +365%
- BABay Area Jewish Healing Centerone grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue -100%
- RIREIMAGINE INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +138%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The foundation operates exclusively for charitable, educational or religious purposes by conducting or supporting activities for the benefit of, or to carry out the purposes of the jewish community federation of san francisco, the…
The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.
(continued from page 1) nationally and internationally. Further, J seeks to enrich the cultural, religious and social life of the community through its articles, interviews and features.
Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.
Support the hebrew univ. of jerusalem, israel's foremost center of higher edu. & research.
Scu is a catholic and jesuit institution that makes student learning its central focus, promotes faculty and staff learning in its various forms, and exhibits organizational learning.
The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…
The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…
We steward $1.5 billion in charitable assets through donor-advised funds, endowments, and other giving vehicles. partnering with 1,400 individuals, families, and organizations, we build enduring legacies and multigenerational impact. in…
The mission of the university of california, irvine foundation (uc irvine foundation) is to raise and manage private funds to support uc irvine's broader mission of excellence in teaching, research and public service. to this end, the uc…
Jewish federation of san diego county is dedicated to building a vibrant, caring, connected, and enduring jewish community.
To serve and enrich the Jewish community and those who support and identify with it, in the greater Sacramento area, Israel, and the world.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The San Francisco Foundation and the most unlike its peers is San Francisco Museum of Modern Art. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
- Who funds SAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART ↗
- Who funds The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES ↗
- Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SPORTS HUMANITARIAN GROUP INC ↗
- Who funds American Friends of Tel Aviv Univ ↗
- Who funds HAIRTOSTAY ↗
- Who funds GREENBELT ALLIANCEPEOPLE FOR OPEN SPACE ↗
- Who funds Jewish Film Institute ↗
- Who funds Bay Area Jewish Healing Center ↗
- Who funds REIMAGINE INC ↗
- Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Jewish Commmunity High School of the Bay ↗
- Who funds GRABHORN INSTITUTE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · John Pritzker Family Fund · Lisa & Douglas Goldman Fund · Marin Community Foundation · Lisa Stone Pritzker Family Fund · The San Francisco Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Lydia and Doug Shorenstein Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Lydia and Doug Shorenstein Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Lydia and Doug Shorenstein Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.