Skip to content

· Private foundation

LVM Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$76k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$52k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$330kHousing & Shelter$63kHuman Services$46kHealth$42kFood & Nutrition$17kInternational$11kCrime & Legal$6kArts & Culture$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $24k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $52k
$2,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$26k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
St John Vianney Catholic Church$52,200
Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Galveston-Houston$7,000
Houston Food Bank$2,000
Casa Juan Diego$2,000
The Salvation Army$2,000
MD Anderson Cancer Center$2,000
St Judes Children's Research Hospital$2,000
Texas Children's Hospital$2,000
Shriners Hospitals For Children$1,000
Smile Train$1,000
Doctors Without Borders$1,000
Self-Help Enterprises$1,000
Star of Hope$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $32k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Casa Juan Diego: $15k → 16%Casa Juan Diego: $10k → 16%Casa Juan Diego: $5k → 16%Casa Juan Diego: $2k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

CA
CO
VA
MD
AR
TN
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$502k · 15 repeat orgs$23k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +105% since the first grant, against +59% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
10

Total granted

$502k
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+105%
+59%

Still filing today

53%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Housing & ShelterHealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentInternationalPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CJ
    CASA JUAN DIEGO
    8× · 2017–2024 · $32k · revenue +34%
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF GALVESTON - HOUSTON
    8× · 2017–2024 · $24k · revenue +139%
  • The Houston Food Bank
    8× · 2017–2024 · $17k · revenue +107%

Funded once

  • HA
    HOUSING ASSISTANCE COUNCILgraduated
    8× · 2017–2024 · $10k · revenue +163%
  • T
    TTAA
    2× · 2023–2024 · $5k
  • TS
    TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDRENgraduated
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2k · revenue +145%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas Children's Urgent Care

To create a healthier future for children and women throughout our global community by leading in patient care, education and research.

Health
2
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
3
Good Samaritan Hospital Foundation

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

—
4
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
5
Mhs Physicians of Texas

Memorial hermann health system is a nonprofit, values-driven, community-owned health system dedicated to improving health. our vision is to create healthier communities, now and for generations to come. our values are community,…

Health
6
Altamed Health Services Corporation

To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.

Health
7
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
8
Cook Children's Medical Center

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.

Health
9
South Texas College of Law Houston Inc

South texas college of law houston provides a diverse body of students the opportunity to obtain an exceptional legal education, preparing graduates to serve their community and profession with distinction.

Education
10
The Methodist Hospital Foundation

Mission: this organization is part of the methodist hospital, doing business as houston methodist hospital, whose mission is: to provide high quality, cost-effective health care that delivers the best value to the people we serve in a…

Health
11
Holy Cross Hospital Inc

We, holy cross hospital and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. holy cross hospital is a member of trinity health.

Health
12
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Texas Children's Hospital; the most unlike its peers is Chappell Hill Volunteer Fire Department. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
21/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST JOHN VIANNEY CATHOLIC CHURCH: $317,300 · OtherST JOHN VIANNEY CATHOLIC CHURCHThe Salvation Army: $22,000 · OtherThe Salvation ArmyThe Houston Food Bank: $17,000 · OtherSt Judes Children's Research Hospital: $16,000 · Other+12 more: $32,880 · Other+12 moreCASA JUAN DIEGO: $32,000 · Human ServicesCASA JUAN DI…CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF GALVESTON - HOUSTON: $24,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHA…STAR OF HOPE MISSION: $13,000 · Housing & ShelterHOUSING ASSISTANCE COUNCIL: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterSelf-Help Enterprises: $8,000 · Housing & ShelterSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $11,000 · HealthTexas Children's Hospital: $8,000 · HealthTEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN: $2,000 · HealthMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $11,000 · InternationalYOUNG LIFE: $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentCHAPPELL HILL VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $100 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$405,180Human Services$56,000Housing & Shelter$31,000Health$21,000International$11,000Youth Development$1,000Public Safety & Disaster$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCASA JUAN DIEGO: $32,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF GALVESTON - HOUSTON: $24,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank: $17,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSTAR OF HOPE MISSION: $13,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $11,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $11,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSING ASSISTANCE COUNCIL: $10,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetTexas Children's Hospital: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSelf-Help Enterprises: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN: $2,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $1,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $1,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCHAPPELL HILL VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $100 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $15 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CASA JUAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF GALVESTON - HOUSTON ↗
  • Who funds The Houston Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds STAR OF HOPE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds HOUSING ASSISTANCE COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds Texas Children's Hospital ↗
  • Who funds Self-Help Enterprises ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds CHAPPELL HILL VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT ↗
  • Who funds Harding University Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Blackbaud Giving FundSC9.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization LVM Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from LVM Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on LVM’s filings →

More from the funding graph