Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

LVM Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$76k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$52k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Religion$330kHousing & Shelter$63kHuman Services$46kHealth$42kFood & Nutrition$17kInternational$11kCrime & Legal$6kArts & Culture$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $24k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $52k
$2,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$26k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
St John Vianney Catholic Church$52,200
Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Galveston-Houston$7,000
Casa Juan Diego$2,000
The Salvation Army$2,000
Texas Children's Hospital$2,000
MD Anderson Cancer Center$2,000
St Judes Children's Research Hospital$2,000
Houston Food Bank$2,000
Doctors Without Borders$1,000
Smile Train$1,000
Star of Hope$1,000
Self-Help Enterprises$1,000
Shriners Hospitals For Children$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $32k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Casa Juan Diego: $15k → 16%Casa Juan Diego: $10k → 16%Casa Juan Diego: $5k → 16%Casa Juan Diego: $2k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

CA
CO
VA
MD
AR
TN
DC
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$502k · 15 repeat orgs$23k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +98% since the first grant, against +59% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
10

Total granted

$502k
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+98%
+59%

Still filing today

53%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Housing & ShelterHealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentInternationalPublic Safety & DisasterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CJ
    CASA JUAN DIEGO
    8× · 2017–2024 · $32k · revenue +34%
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF GALVESTON - HOUSTON
    8× · 2017–2024 · $24k · revenue +139%
  • The Houston Food Bank
    8× · 2017–2024 · $17k · revenue +107%

Funded once

  • HA
    HOUSING ASSISTANCE COUNCILgraduated
    8× · 2017–2024 · $10k · revenue +163%
  • T
    TTAA
    2× · 2023–2024 · $5k
  • TS
    TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDRENgraduated
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2k · revenue +63%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas Children's Urgent Care

To create a healthier future for children and women throughout our global community by leading in patient care, education and research.

Health
2
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
3
Good Samaritan Hospital Foundation

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

4
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
5
Mhs Physicians of Texas

Memorial hermann health system is a nonprofit, values-driven, community-owned health system dedicated to improving health. our vision is to create healthier communities, now and for generations to come. our values are community,…

Health
6
Altamed Health Services Corporation

To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.

Health
7
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
8
Cook Children's Medical Center

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.

Health
9
South Texas College of Law Houston Inc

South texas college of law houston provides a diverse body of students the opportunity to obtain an exceptional legal education, preparing graduates to serve their community and profession with distinction.

Education
10
The Methodist Hospital Foundation

Mission: this organization is part of the methodist hospital, doing business as houston methodist hospital, whose mission is: to provide high quality, cost-effective health care that delivers the best value to the people we serve in a…

Health
11
Holy Cross Hospital Inc

We, holy cross hospital and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. holy cross hospital is a member of trinity health.

Health
12
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Texas Children's Hospital and the most unlike its peers is Chappell Hill Volunteer Fire Department. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 52 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number27%0%<5yr16%4%5–10yr20%8%10–20yr17%15%20–35yr10%27%35–55yr11%46%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value27%0%<5yr16%0%5–10yr20%0%10–20yr17%2%20–35yr10%9%35–55yr11%89%55yr+

The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/30
the rest of the field
17%
8,398/49,922

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
21/26
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ST JOHN VIANNEY CATHOLIC CHURCH — $317,300 · OtherST JOHN VIANNEY CATHOLIC CHURCHThe Salvation Army — $22,000 · OtherThe Salvation ArmyThe Houston Food Bank — $17,000 · OtherSt Judes Children's Research Hospital — $16,000 · Other+12 more — $32,880 · Other+12 moreCASA JUAN DIEGO — $32,000 · Human ServicesCASA JUAN DI…CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF GALVESTON - HOUSTON — $24,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHA…STAR OF HOPE MISSION — $13,000 · Housing & ShelterHOUSING ASSISTANCE COUNCIL — $10,000 · Housing & ShelterSelf-Help Enterprises — $8,000 · Housing & ShelterSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $11,000 · HealthTexas Children's Hospital — $8,000 · HealthTEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN — $2,000 · HealthMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $11,000 · InternationalYOUNG LIFE — $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentCHAPPELL HILL VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT — $100 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$405,180Human Services$56,000Housing & Shelter$31,000Health$21,000International$11,000Youth Development$1,000Public Safety & Disaster$100

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCASA JUAN DIEGO — $32,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF GALVESTON - HOUSTON — $24,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank — $17,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSTAR OF HOPE MISSION — $13,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $11,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $11,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSING ASSISTANCE COUNCIL — $10,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetSelf-Help Enterprises — $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTexas Children's Hospital — $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN — $2,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC — $1,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG LIFE — $1,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCHAPPELL HILL VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT — $100 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $15 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CASA JUAN DIEGO
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF GALVESTON - HOUSTON
  • Who funds The Houston Food Bank
  • Who funds STAR OF HOPE MISSION
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN
  • Who funds HOUSING ASSISTANCE COUNCIL
  • Who funds Self-Help Enterprises
  • Who funds Texas Children's Hospital
  • Who funds TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE
  • Who funds Harding University Inc
  • Who funds CHAPPELL HILL VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Blackbaud Giving FundSC9.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization LVM Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph