Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Lutheran Social Services of ND

Guided by god's love and grace, Lutheran Social Services of ND brought healing, help, and hope.

$1.1M
Granted FY2021
12
Grants FY2021
2
States reached
$27k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172021.

Education$385kHealth$308kEmployment$286kHuman Services$112kCommunity Improvement$20k
02FY2021 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 12 grants below total $160,802 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,131,041 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $970,239 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k5 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $123k
$14,510
Median grant
2
States reached
$303k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Family Healthcare Center$27,126
Fargo Public Schools$21,287
South Sudanese Foundation$20,000
West Fargo Public Schools$15,420
Fargo Public Schools$14,920
Grand Forks Public Schools -ALC$14,510
Afro American Development Association$10,000
Kirat Cultural Society of North Dakota$9,867
Global Friends Coalition$9,500
Bismarck Public School District$7,000
Bismarck Global Neighbors$6,000
Fargo Public Schools$5,172
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $63k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Global Friends Coalition: $23k → 13%Bismarck Global Neighbors: $6k → 10%Global Friends Coalition: $15k → 13%Global Friends Coalition: $10k → 13%Kirat Cultural Society of North Dakota: $10k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 6% of Lutheran Social Services of ND’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Lutheran Social Services of NDlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 17% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.1M · 12 repeat orgs$46k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2021, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
1

Total granted

$1.1M
$10k

Still filing today

25%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $36k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21
Human ServicesHealthCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FH
    FAMILY HEALTHCARE CENTER
    4× · 2017–2021 · $206k · revenue +71%
  • AA
    AFRO AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION
    4× · 2017–2021 · $106k · revenue +176%
  • GF
    GLOBAL FRIENDS COALITION
    3× · 2017–2021 · $47k · revenue +97%

Funded once

  • BB
    Bhutanese Buddha Society of North Dakota
    one grant, 2017 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
05the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/7
Grantees still filing
6/7
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

South East Education Cooperative — $293,940 · OtherSouth East Education CooperativeFAMILY HEALTHCARE CENTER — $206,434 · OtherFAMILY HEALTHCARE CENTERWest Fargo Public Schools Agency — $125,780 · OtherWest Fargo Public Schools AgencyAFRO AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION — $105,830 · OtherAFRO AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATIONGRAND FORKS PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT — $66,121 · OtherGRAND FORKS PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICTSomali Community Development of North Dakota Inc — $51,500 · OtherMissouri River Educational Cooperative — $39,800 · OtherCITY OF FARGO — $39,643 · Other+3 more — $64,861 · Other+3 moreGLOBAL FRIENDS COALITION — $47,279 · Human ServicesKIRAT CULTURAL SOCIETY OF NORTH DAKOTA — $9,867 · Human ServicesBISMARCK GLOBAL NEIGHBORS — $6,000 · Human ServicesSPECTRA HEALTH — $33,690 · HealthSOUTH SUDANESE FOUNDATION — $20,000 · Community Improvement
Other$993,909Human Services$63,146Health$33,690Community Improvement$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFAMILY HEALTHCARE CENTER — $206,434 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetAFRO AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION — $105,830 over 4y, 18% of budgetGLOBAL FRIENDS COALITION — $47,279 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetSPECTRA HEALTH — $33,690 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSOUTH SUDANESE FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetBISMARCK GLOBAL NEIGHBORS — $6,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FAMILY HEALTHCARE CENTER
  • Who funds AFRO AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds GLOBAL FRIENDS COALITION
  • Who funds SPECTRA HEALTH
  • Who funds SOUTH SUDANESE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds KIRAT CULTURAL SOCIETY OF NORTH DAKOTA
  • Who funds BISMARCK GLOBAL NEIGHBORS

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Dakota Caring FoundationND21.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Dakota Caring Foundation · North Dakota Community Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Sanford Group Return · United Way of Cass-Clay · Fargo-Moorhead Area Foundation Corporation · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Lutheran Social Services of ND funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2023) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph