Skip to content
Luther I Replogle Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Luther I Replogle Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$449k
Granted FY2025still arriving
50
Grants FY2025still arriving
13
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$1.1MHuman Services$547kReligion$351kArts & Culture$309kHealth$283kYouth Development$270kCrime & Legal$216kInternational$166kOther$0
02FY2025 · 50 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k28 grants · $95k
  • $10k–50k21 grants · $294k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$7,500
Median grant
13
States reached
$14M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME DU LAC$60,000
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CHICAGO$37,921
JOHN CARTER BROWN LIBRARY$30,000
REPLOGLE CENTER FOR COUNSELING AND WELL-BEING$28,000
TOGETHER WE BAKE$16,000
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION$15,000
MERIT SCHOOL OF MUSIC$12,000
BAY AREA COMMUNITY SERVICES$12,000
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE$12,000
REACH EDUCATION INC$11,000
CREATE MPLS$10,000
BECAUSE I CAN$10,000
SHOUT MOUSE PRESS$10,000
WASHINGTON URBAN DEBATE LEAGUE$10,000
GIRLS DREAM CODE$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $755k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%AMPERSAND FAMILIES: $25k → 14%HOMELESS CHILDREN'S PLAYTIME PROJECT: $11k → 14%AMPERSAND FAMILIES: $16k → 14%Homeless Children's Playtime Project: $10k → 14%AMPERSAND FAMILIES: $15k → 14%Homeless Children's Playtime Project: $10k → 14%TOGETHER WE BAKE: $16k → 9%HOMELESS CHILDREN'S PLAYTIME PROJECT: $10k → 14%HOMELESS CHILDREN'S PLAYTIME PROJECT: $10k → 14%PLAYTIME PROJECT: $10k → 14%HOMELESS CHILDREN'S PLAYTIME PROJECT: $10k → 14%AMPERSAND FAMILIES: $30k → 14%REACH EDUCATION INC: $16k → 14%Breaking Free: $10k → 14%REACH EDUCATION INC: $16k → 14%Breaking Free: $10k → 14%REACH EDUCATION INC: $15k → 14%REACH EDUCATION INC: $15k → 14%REACH EDUCATION INC: $11k → 14%REACH EDUCATION INC: $11k → 14%FAMILY & YOUTH INITIATIVE: $8k → 14%Bridge for Youth The: $15k → 11%FAMILY & YOUTH INITIATIVE: $8k → 14%FAMILY & YOUTH INITIATIVE: $8k → 14%REACH Inc: $15k → 14%Ampersand Families: $10k → 11%REACH Inc: $15k → 14%Ampersand Families: $10k → 11%GIFT OF ADOPTION FUND: $25k → 14%LIGHTHOUSE DC: $10k → 14%NEGOTIATION WORKS: $10k → 14%FOSTER AND ADOPTIVE PARENT ADVOCACY CENTER: $11k → 14%Foster and Adoptive Parent Advocacy: $10k → 14%FOSTER AND ADOPTIVE PARENT ADVOCACY CENTER: $10k → 14%Foster and Adoptive Parent Advocacy: $10k → 14%FOSTER AND ADOPTIVE PARENT ADVOCACY CENTER: $10k → 14%FOSTER AND ADOPTIVE PARENT ADVOCACY CENTER: $10k → 14%FOSTER AND ADOPTIVE PARENT ADVOCACY CENTER: $10k → 14%FOSTER AND ADOPTIVE PARENT ADVOCACY CENTER: $10k → 14%GREATER DC DIAPER BANK: $19k → 14%CASA FOR CHILDREN OF DC: $10k → 14%ACCESS YOUTH: $15k → 14%ACCESS YOUTH: $11k → 14%ACCESS YOUTH: $10k → 14%ACCESS Youth: $10k → 14%ACCESS YOUTH: $10k → 14%ACCESS YOUTH: $10k → 14%Access Youth: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
MN
IL
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
VA
MD
DC
AL
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.6M · 95 repeat orgs$455k to everyone else

95 repeat relationships: 36 still active in FY2025, 59 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

95
58

Total granted

$3.6M
$410k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+36%

Still filing today

69%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureCrime & LegalRecreation & SportsHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FP
    FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CHICAGO
    9× · 2017–2025 · $305k · revenue +21% · 60% of their budget
  • MS
    MERIT SCHOOL OF MUSIC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $108k · revenue +113%
  • AF
    AMPERSAND FAMILIES
    6× · 2017–2022 · $106k · revenue +140%

Funded once

  • SS
    South Shore Health System Foundation
    one grant, 2017 · $55k
  • AA
    AMERICAN ACADEMY IN ROME
    one grant, 2019 · $30k · revenue +21%
  • RC
    Replogle Center for Counseling and Wellness
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Council for Court Excellence

Council for court excellence's (cce's) mission is to bring people together to conduct research, educate, and advocate to make d.c.'s unique legal systems more just, equitable, and accountable to the community.

—
2
Alternatives Inc

Alternatives, inc.'s mission is to facilitate personal development,strengthen family relationships and enhance the community's well being. serving over 3,000 youth and families annually, the organization offers a range of counseling and…

Health
3
Capitol Hill Day School

Capitol Hill Day School is a co-educational independent school serving students from pre-kindergarten through 8th grade. Capitol Hill Day School deeply engages a diverse community of students in connecting the classroom with the larger…

Education
4
Cityworks Dc

Our mission is to dramatically improve the early career outcomes of dc youth and young adults of color by creating innovative programs and by mobilizing employers, educators, and city leaders to create a local, diverse talent pipeline. our…

Education
5
Springboard Collaborative

Springboard collaborative combines targeted student instruction with parent training in an incentivized system that closes the literacy gap, by transferring the summer from a barrier into a springboard for financially disadvantaged…

Human Services
6
Global Kids Inc

Global kids educates, inspires and mobilizes youth to become global citizens who are positively engaged in the world and are prepared for their future.

Youth Development
7
Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education
8
A Better Chicago

A better chicago is changing how chicago fights poverty by investing in bold ideas that create opportunity for our youth.

Human Services
9
City Year Inc

City year helps students and schools succeed, while preparing the next generation of civically engaged leaders who can work across lines of difference. partnering with teachers, teams of city year americorps members cultivate learning…

Unclassified
10
Chicago Psychoanalytic Institute

The chicago psychoanalytic institute transforms the lives of individuals, families and communities, using psychoanalytic knowledge to help them grow and thrive.

Social Science
11
Deans for Impact

See Schedule ODeans for Impact supports educator-preparation programs to bring the science of learning into teaching practice; partners with policymakers to ensure pathways into teaching are accessible, practice-based, and…

Education
12
Wonders Early Learning Extended Day

To create and advance high quality, diverse educational communities that teach children the foundations of life-long learning and social responsibility.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Homeless Children's Playtime Project; the most unlike its peers is Reset. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

115 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 115 of the 171 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
32
Early backer (in before they grew)
113/115
Grantees still filing
83/115
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN SCHOOL OF CLASSICAL STUDIES AT ATHENS: $444,000 · OtherAMERICAN SCHOOL OF CLASSICAL STUDIES AT ATHENSREPLOGLE CENTER FOR COUNSELING AND WELL-BEING: $203,000 · OtherREPLOGLE CENTER FOR COUNSELING AND WELL-BEINGJOHN CARTER BROWN LIBRARY: $115,000 · OtherJOHN CARTER BROWN LIBRARYStorycatchers: $86,000 · OtherRESET: $76,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S LAW CENTER OF MINNESOTA: $82,500 · Other+101 more: $1,129,250 · Other+101 moreREACH EDUCATION INC: $113,500 · Human ServicesREACH EDUCATION INCAMPERSAND FAMILIES: $106,000 · Human ServicesAMPERSAND FAMILIESFOSTER & ADOPTIVE PARENT ADVOCACY CENTER: $81,000 · Human ServicesFOSTER & ADOPTIVE PAR…ACCESS INC: $76,000 · Human ServicesACCESS INCHOMELESS CHILDREN'S PLAYTIME PROJECT: $71,000 · Human ServicesHOMELESS CHILDREN'S P…Breaking Free Inc: $45,000 · Human ServicesBreaking Free IncGREATER DC DIAPER BANK: $43,500 · Human ServicesGREATER DC DIAPER BAN…NEGOTIATION WORKS: $30,000 · Human ServicesTogether We Bake: $30,000 · Human ServicesCASA for Children of the District of Columbia: $27,500 · Human ServicesFAMILY AND YOUTH INITIATIVE INC: $27,500 · Human Services+12 more: $126,500 · Human Services+12 moreHIGH JUMP: $73,500 · EducationHIGH JUMPUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $60,000 · EducationUniversity o…US NAVAL ACADEMY FOUNDATION INC: $37,500 · EducationUS NAVAL ACA…UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $35,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY O…ScholarCHIPS Inc: $32,500 · EducationScholarCHIPS…GIRLS DREAM CODE: $30,000 · EducationGIRLS DREAM …TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $25,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF …EDMUND BURKE SCHOOL INC: $20,000 · EducationSIT STAY READ INC: $20,000 · EducationPROJECT EDUCATION PLUS: $20,000 · EducationWASHINGTON URBAN DEBATE LEAGUE INC: $20,000 · EducationMINNEHAHA ACADEMY: $20,000 · EducationChicago Heightening Opportunity and Potential for: $15,000 · Education+9 more: $32,530 · Education+9 moreFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CHICAGO: $305,433 · Religion+1 more: $3,000 · ReligionMERIT SCHOOL OF MUSIC: $108,000 · Arts & CultureSHOUTMOUSEPRESSINC: $58,500 · Arts & CultureWords Beats and Life Inc: $15,000 · Arts & CultureThe Roxie Theater: $7,500 · Arts & Culture+4 more: $10,000 · Arts & CultureCritical Exposure Inc: $56,000 · Youth DevelopmentHORIZONS GREATER WASHINGTON INC: $46,000 · Youth DevelopmentCREATEMPLS: $35,000 · Youth Development+1 more: $4,500 · Youth DevelopmentInternational Rescue Committee INC: $57,000 · InternationalAMERICAN ACADEMY OF DIPLOMACY: $45,000 · InternationalAMERICAN ACADEMY IN ROME: $30,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $5,500 · International+1 more: $2,000 · International
Other$2,135,750Human Services$777,500Education$441,030Religion$308,433Arts & Culture$199,000Youth Development$141,500International$139,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CHICAGO: $305,433 over 9y, 60% of budgetREACH EDUCATION INC: $113,500 over 8y, 2.8% of budgetMERIT SCHOOL OF MUSIC: $108,000 over 9y, 1.4% of budgetAMPERSAND FAMILIES: $106,000 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetStorycatchers: $86,000 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetCHILDREN'S LAW CENTER OF MINNESOTA: $82,500 over 9y, 1.2% of budgetFOSTER & ADOPTIVE PARENT ADVOCACY CENTER: $81,000 over 8y, 2.0% of budgetACCESS INC: $76,000 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetRESET: $76,000 over 8y, 25% of budgetHIGH JUMP: $73,500 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetHOMELESS CHILDREN'S PLAYTIME PROJECT: $71,000 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $60,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHOUTMOUSEPRESSINC: $58,500 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $57,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCritical Exposure Inc: $56,000 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetLOST BOYZINC: $50,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetHORIZONS GREATER WASHINGTON INC: $46,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetBreaking Free Inc: $45,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN ACADEMY OF DIPLOMACY: $45,000 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetGREATER DC DIAPER BANK: $43,500 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetSPUR LOCAL INC: $40,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetUS NAVAL ACADEMY FOUNDATION INC: $37,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJO DAVIESS CONSERVATION FOUNDATION INC: $35,500 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetBCAUSEICAN INC: $35,000 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $35,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCREATEMPLS: $35,000 over 5y, 3.1% of budgetScholarCHIPS Inc: $32,500 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetNEGOTIATION WORKS: $30,000 over 4y, 5.0% of budgetAMERICAN ACADEMY IN ROME: $30,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGIRLS DREAM CODE: $30,000 over 4y, 6.5% of budgetTogether We Bake: $30,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetCASA for Children of the District of Columbia: $27,500 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetFAMILY AND YOUTH INITIATIVE INC: $27,500 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetGIFT OF ADOPTION FUND INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE HOUSE: $22,500 over 3y, 4.4% of budgetPeace of Mind Inc: $22,500 over 3y, 4.1% of budgetWAY TO GROW: $21,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetEDMUND BURKE SCHOOL INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSIT STAY READ INC: $20,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetPROJECT EDUCATION PLUS: $20,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetWASHINGTON URBAN DEBATE LEAGUE INC: $20,000 over 3y, 4.8% of budgetMINNEHAHA ACADEMY: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLIGHTHOUSE DC: $20,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $18,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO YOUTH PROGRAMS INC: $16,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetWords Beats and Life Inc: $15,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetFamilyWise Services: $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds REACH EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MERIT SCHOOL OF MUSIC ↗
  • Who funds AMPERSAND FAMILIES ↗
  • Who funds Storycatchers ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S LAW CENTER OF MINNESOTA ↗
  • Who funds FOSTER & ADOPTIVE PARENT ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ACCESS INC ↗
  • Who funds RESET ↗
  • Who funds HIGH JUMP ↗
  • Who funds HOMELESS CHILDREN'S PLAYTIME PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
  • Who funds SHOUTMOUSEPRESSINC ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds Critical Exposure Inc ↗
  • Who funds LOST BOYZINC ↗
  • Who funds HORIZONS GREATER WASHINGTON INC ↗
  • Who funds Breaking Free Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DIPLOMACY ↗
  • Who funds GREATER DC DIAPER BANK ↗
  • Who funds SPUR LOCAL INC ↗
  • Who funds US NAVAL ACADEMY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JO DAVIESS CONSERVATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BCAUSEICAN INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CREATEMPLS ↗
  • Who funds ScholarCHIPS Inc ↗
  • Who funds NEGOTIATION WORKS ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ACADEMY IN ROME ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS DREAM CODE ↗
  • Who funds Together We Bake ↗
  • Who funds CASA for Children of the District of Columbia ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Morris and Gwendo…Greater Washington Co…Corina Higginson Trus…United Way of the Nat…Dimick Foundation Joh…John Edward Fowler Me…Philip L Graham Fund …Eugene & Agnes E Meye…Clark-Winchcole Found…Nora Roberts Foundati…Max & Victoria Dreyfu…The Ottowhalley Famil…
The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz FoundationDC45.4× affinity21 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · Greater Washington Community Foundation · Corina Higginson Trust Co Laura Ford Trustee · United Way of the National Capital Area · Dimick Foundation John M Lynham Jr Trustee · John Edward Fowler Memorial Foundation · Philip L Graham Fund co Graham Holdings Company · Eugene & Agnes E Meyer Foundation · Clark-Winchcole Foundation · Nora Roberts Foundation · Max & Victoria Dreyfus Foundation Inc · The Ottowhalley Family Foundation Inc C/O Metropolitan Agents Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Luther I Replogle Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Luther I Replogle Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 48%
  • Harborcov Inc: 76% of income from government
  • Bay Cove Human Services Inc: 70% of income from government
  • Justice Resource Institute Inc: 48% of income from government
  • Social Capital Inc: 11% of income from government
  • South Shore Art Center Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Manna Food Center Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
37report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Luther I Replogle Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Luther I Replogle Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 171 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Luther I Replogle’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home