Skip to content

· Public charity

Lundy Family Foundation

To conduct and support activities for the benefit of, to perform the functions, and/or to carry out the purposes (collectively the "qualified purposes") of the class of organizations ("qualified organizations") organized under sections 501(c)(3), 509(a)(1), and 509(a)(2) of the internal revenue code of 1986, as amended from time to time…

$356k
Granted FY2019
14
Grants FY2019
5
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2019.

Health$329kReligion$312kInternational$82kScience & Tech$30kPublic Benefit$22kEducation$20kYouth Development$20kHousing & Shelter$18kOther$0
02FY2019 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 14 grants below total $334,421, the rows itemized in this filing. The $356,421 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $22,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k3 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $139k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $173k
$20,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOWARD HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$60,000
UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF MEDICINE$60,000
GRACE COMMUNITY CHURCH$53,200
SEARCH MINISTRIES$25,000
AOET$20,555
GARRETT REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER$20,000
THE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF HARTFORD$20,000
WASHINGTON CITY MISSION$18,334
JOHNS HOPKINS$15,000
GARRETT COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL$10,000
THE BIBLE CHAPEL$10,000
CITY MISSION$8,332
ST CLAIR MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$7,000
FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WASHINGTON CITY MISSION: $18k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$758k · 11 repeat orgs$88k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2019, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
1

Total granted

$758k
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%
+574%

Still filing today

45%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $58k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19
HealthYouth DevelopmentInternationalEducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HH
    HOWARD HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2017–2019 · $110k · revenue +42%
  • TJ
    THE JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL
    2× · 2017–2019 · $55k · revenue +58%
  • JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2017–2018 · $20k · revenue +64%

Funded once

  • JH
    JOHNS HOPKINS GLOBAL INC
    one grant, 2018 · $30k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation

Johns hopkins health system corporation provides centralized management of a multi-hospital healthcare system. it is a key component of johns hopkins medicine, a collaboration with the johns hopkins university school of medicine.

Health
2
Howard Hughes Medical Institute

The mission of the institute has remained constant since its founding in 1953. as its restated articles of incorporation state the primary purpose and objective of the howard hughes medical institute shall be the promotion of human…

Health
3
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
4
Adventist Healthcare Inc

We extend god's care through the ministry of physical, mental and spiritual healing.

—
5
Lucy Webb Hayes National Training School for Deaconesses & Missionaries

Sibley memorial hospital in washington, d.c., a member of johns hopkins medicine, has a distinguished history of serving the community since its founding in 1890. as a not-for-profit, full-service community hospital, sibley offers…

Health
6
Howard County General Hospital Inc

Mission: johns hopkins howard county medical center, a member of johns hopkins medicine, strives to provide the highest quality care to improve the health of our entire community through innovation, collaboration, service excellence,…

Health
7
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
8
Washington University

The washington university is a co-educational, nondenominational university with a long and distinguished history of teaching, research and (cont'd on schedule o)

Education
9
Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center Inc

Johns hopkins bayview medical center's department of medicine is committed to the practice of primary and specialty medical care, the teaching of medical students, residents, fellows, allied health professionals, and physicians, research…

Health
10
The Christ Hospital

Improve the health of our community and create patient value by providing exceptional outcomes and the finest experiences, all in an affordable way.

Health
11
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
12
Thomas Jefferson University

Thomas jefferson university ("tju") is a comprehensive university with preeminence in transdisciplinary, experiential professional education, research and discovery, delivering exceptional value for the 21st century students with…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Howard Hospital Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Johns Hopkins Global Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GRACE COMMUNITY CHURCH OF HOWARD COUNTY INC: $161,000 · OtherGRACE COMMUNITY CHURCH OF HOWARD COUNTY INCSEARCH MINISTRIES INC: $155,000 · OtherSEARCH MINISTRIES INCUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $100,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF MEDICINEJOHNS HOPKINS GLOBAL INC: $30,000 · OtherJOHNS HOPKINS GLOBAL INCSOUTH HILLS BIBLE CHAPEL: $25,500 · OtherCITY MISSION: $21,666 · OtherGARRETT REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER: $20,000 · Other+1 more: $14,000 · OtherHOWARD HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $110,000 · HealthHOWARD HOSPITAL FOUNDA…THE JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL: $55,000 · HealthTHE JOHNS HOPKINS HOSP…OPERATION ONE: $82,317 · InternationalOPERATION O…THE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF HARTFORD: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $14,000 · Youth DevelopmentJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $20,000 · EducationWASHINGTON CITY MISSION: $18,334 · Human Services
Other$527,166Health$165,000International$82,317Youth Development$34,000Education$20,000Human Services$18,334

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOWARD HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $110,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetOPERATION ONE: $82,317 over 3y, 4.4% of budgetTHE JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL: $55,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF HARTFORD: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWASHINGTON CITY MISSION: $18,334 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $14,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HOWARD HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION ONE ↗
  • Who funds THE JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS GLOBAL INC ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF HARTFORD ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON CITY MISSION ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ayco Charitable FoundationNY13.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lundy Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lundy Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • The Boys and Girls Clubs of Hartford: 20% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • The Johns Hopkins Hospital: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Lundy Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Lundy Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lundy Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph