Loading…
· Public charity
LUNDY FAMILY FOUNDATION
To conduct,support,promote and/or perform educational and/or christian objectives, including but not limited to christian evangelism, acts of service, edification and stewardship.
$356k
Granted FY2019
14
Grants
5
Communities
$60k
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 62% of LUNDY FAMILY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2018
research
2019
productivehomeless
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2019 · 14 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2019
- Under $10k3 grants · $22k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $139k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $173k
$20,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
- HOWARD HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$60,000
- UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF MEDICINE$60,000
- GRACE COMMUNITY CHURCH$53,200
- SEARCH MINISTRIES$25,000
- AOET$20,555
- THE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF HARTFORD$20,000
- GARRETT REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER$20,000
- WASHINGTON CITY MISSION$18,334
- JOHNS HOPKINS$15,000
- GARRETT COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL$10,000
- THE BIBLE CHAPEL$10,000
- CITY MISSION$8,332
- FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES$7,000
- ST CLAIR MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$7,000
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY19–19, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$758k · 11 repeat orgs$88k to everyone else
11 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2019, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
11
1
Total granted
$758k
$30k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+45%
+574%
Still filing today
45%
0%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2019, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $58k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
HealthYouth DevelopmentInternationalEducationHuman ServicesOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HHHOWARD HOSPITAL FOUNDATION2× · 2017–2019 · $110k · revenue +61%
- JHJOHNS HOPKINS2× · 2017–2019 · $55k · revenue +30%
JHU - SPONSELLER2× · 2017–2018 · $20k · revenue +45%
Funded once
- JDJHU - DEPARTMENTone grant, 2018 · $30k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
The Howard University
We educate students, develop professionals, conduct research, and serve patients.
Education
2
Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation
Johns hopkins health system corporation provides centralized management of a multi-hospital healthcare system. it is a key component of johns hopkins medicine, a collaboration with the johns hopkins university school of medicine.
Health
3
Howard Hughes Medical Institute
The howard hughes medical institute is a philanthropy that serves society through the direct conduct of biomedical research and support for programs in science education.
Health
4
The Washington Hospital
The washington hospital is a community hospital dedicated to improving health / providing patient care to all persons without regard to race, color, religion, sex, national origin, disability or ability to pay.
Health
5
Washington University Medical Center
To provide and assist its member organizations in providing hospital facilities, physical properties, and programs appropriate for the care and treatment of patients, for the continued on Schedule O
—
6
Christ's Hospital
—
7
Hartford International University for
Hartford international university for religion and peace serves god: by preparing leaders, students, scholars and religions institutions to understand and live faithfully in today's multi-faith and pluralistic world; by teaching, research,…
Education
8
Houston Christian University
To provide instruction for approximately 5,200 students in undergraduate and graduate courses.
—
9
Washington University
The washington university is a co-educational, nondenominational university with a long and distinguished history of teaching, research and (cont'd on schedule o)
Education
10
The Christ Hospital
Improve the health of our community and create patient value by providing exceptional outcomes and the finest experiences, all in an affordable way.
Health
11
Johns Hopkins Community Physicians Inc
Johns hopkins community physicians, inc. (jhcp), a valued member of johns hopkins medicine, is a network of medical practices strategically positioned throughout communities in maryland and dc. we strive to meet the needs of each community…
—
12
Johns Hopkins Bayview
Johns hopkins bayview medical center, a member of johns hopkins medicine, provides compassionate health care that is focused on the uniqueness and dignity of each person we serve. we offer this care in an environment that promotes,…
Health
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Johns Hopkins University and the most unlike its peers is Fellowship of Christian Athletes. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
8 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$527,166Health$165,000International$82,317Youth Development$34,000Education$20,000Human Services$18,334
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
The Ayco Charitable FoundationNY15.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation LUNDY FAMILY FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: AOET.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
medium risk
~5 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 8 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 204145965 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on AOET, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 5 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 4% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Lundy Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Lundy Family Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines