Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Lundstrom Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$135k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$90k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Animals$1.1MPhilanthropy$70kHuman Services$21kArts & Culture$13k
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $45k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $90k
$90,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The S Lundstrom Donor Advised Fund Vanguard Charitable$90,000
Craig Lundstrom Donor Advised Fund Vanguard Charitable$45,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $33k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%THE PETS FOR THE ELDERLY FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%Paws with a Cause: $4k → 10%THE PETS FOR THE ELDERLY FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%Paws with a Cause: $4k → 10%Pets for the Elderly Foundation: $3k → 11%Paws with a Cause: $4k → 10%Pets for the Elderly Foundation: $3k → 11%PAWS WITH A CAUSE: $3k → 10%Paws with a Cause: $3k → 10%PAWS WITH A CAUSE: $3k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
IL
WI
MI
RI
UT
CO
AZ
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.1M · 31 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +69% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.

31 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 29 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
4

Total granted

$1.1M
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+69%
+19%

Still filing today

68%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HS
    HUMANE SOCIETY OF WEST MICHIGAN
    7× · 2017–2023 · $41k · revenue +66%
  • EB
    EVA BURRELL ANIMAL SHELTER
    5× · 2019–2023 · $39k · revenue +398%
  • CH
    CHERRYLAND HUMANE SOCIETY
    7× · 2017–2023 · $38k · revenue +302%

Funded once

  • DR
    DAUNTLESS RESCUE INC
    one grant, 2018 · $6k · revenue +19%
  • MA
    METROPLEX ANIMAL COALITION
    one grant, 2017 · $4k
  • TA
    The August Foundation for Alaska Racing Dogsgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +25%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Raskels Rescue
Animals
2
Paws and Claws Animal Shelter
Animals
3
Humane Society of Southwest Missouri

The humane society of southwest missouri is one of the largest open admission, no kill shelters in southwest missouri. it is dedicated to helping sick, injured and abandoned dogs and cats find their forever homes. for over 60 years the…

Animals
4
Humane Society & Animal Rescue of Muskegon County

To shelter and find forever homes for homeless dogs and cats.

Animals
5
The Animal Haven Inc

The animal haven's misson is to provide a temporary, safe, caring and humane refuge for homeless dogs and cats and place these animals in quality adoptive homes.

Animals
6
Fur Animal Rescue

Animal rescue organization dedicated to finding homes for animals at the animal shelter. we also provde vet care foster homes, and assistance with homing for special needs animals.

Animals
7
Donna's Love Pet Rescue
Animals
8
The Adoptable Dog
Animals
9
Happy Acres Pet Rescue
Animals
10
Mountain View Animal Rescue

Rescue of abused or abandoned animals

Animals
11
Paws and Claws Animal Welfare Society Inc

Animal Rescue

Animals
12
Humane Society of Southwestern Michigan

Humane society of southwestern michigan exists to provide shelter and care for sick, homeless and unwanted animals. in addition, the organization provides adoption services for the animals in its care.

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Verde Valley Humane Society Inc and the most unlike its peers is Fort Michilimackinac Pageant Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%4%<5yr13%0%5–10yr19%13%10–20yr18%29%20–35yr14%25%35–55yr18%29%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%2%<5yr13%0%5–10yr19%6%10–20yr18%30%20–35yr14%26%35–55yr18%36%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/25
the rest of the field
10%
646/6,388

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
23/25
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

The S Lundstrom Donor Advised Fund Vanguard Charitable — $369,000 · OtherThe S Lundstrom Donor Advised Fund Vanguard CharitableCraig Lundstrom Donor Advised Fund Vanguard Charitable — $232,100 · OtherCraig Lundstrom Donor Advised Fund Vanguard Charitable+9 more — $104,900 · Other+9 moreHUMANE SOCIETY OF WEST MICHIGAN — $41,000 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF WEST MICHIGANEVA BURRELL ANIMAL SHELTER — $39,000 · AnimalsEVA BURRELL ANIMAL SHELTERCHERRYLAND HUMANE SOCIETY — $38,000 · AnimalsCHERRYLAND HUMANE SOCIETYHUMANE SOCIETY OF SEDONA INC — $27,500 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF SEDONA INCCHAMPAIGN COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY — $23,000 · AnimalsCHAMPAIGN COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETYMCCLOUDS LAKE HAVEN — $21,000 · AnimalsMCCLOUDS LAKE HAVENDENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE — $21,000 · AnimalsDENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUEVERDE VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $19,000 · AnimalsHELP FROM MY FRIENDS INC — $18,000 · AnimalsFriends of Foothills Animal Shelter — $16,500 · AnimalsTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF BOULDER VALLEY INC — $16,500 · AnimalsEASTSHORE HUMANE ASSOCIATION INC — $15,000 · AnimalsMACKENZIE'S ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC — $13,000 · AnimalsCAT CARE SOCIETY — $12,000 · Animals+6 more — $37,500 · Animals+6 moreVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM — $70,000 · PhilanthropyPaws With A Cause — $20,500 · Human ServicesPETS FOR THE ELDERLY FOUNDATION — $12,000 · Human ServicesFORT MICHILIMACKINAC PAGEANT INC — $12,000 · Arts & CultureROCKY MOUNTAIN PUBLIC MEDIA INC — $600 · Arts & Culture
Other$706,000Animals$358,000Philanthropy$70,000Human Services$32,500Arts & Culture$12,600

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF WEST MICHIGAN — $41,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetEVA BURRELL ANIMAL SHELTER — $39,000 over 5y, 5.8% of budgetCHERRYLAND HUMANE SOCIETY — $38,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF SEDONA INC — $27,500 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetCHAMPAIGN COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY — $23,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetMCCLOUDS LAKE HAVEN — $21,000 over 4y, 7.4% of budgetDENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE — $21,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPaws With A Cause — $20,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetVERDE VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $19,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetHELP FROM MY FRIENDS INC — $18,000 over 3y, 6.2% of budgetFriends of Foothills Animal Shelter — $16,500 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF BOULDER VALLEY INC — $16,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetEASTSHORE HUMANE ASSOCIATION INC — $15,000 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetMACKENZIE'S ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC — $13,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetPETS FOR THE ELDERLY FOUNDATION — $12,000 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetCAT CARE SOCIETY — $12,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetFORT MICHILIMACKINAC PAGEANT INC — $12,000 over 2y, 64% of budgetYAVAPAI HUMANE SOCIETY — $11,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLIFELINE PET RESCUE — $7,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetGOLDEN RETRIEVER RESCUE OF THE ROCKIES — $7,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY — $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe August Foundation for Alaska Racing Dogs — $2,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN PUBLIC MEDIA INC — $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF WEST MICHIGAN
  • Who funds EVA BURRELL ANIMAL SHELTER
  • Who funds CHERRYLAND HUMANE SOCIETY
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF SEDONA INC
  • Who funds CHAMPAIGN COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY
  • Who funds MCCLOUDS LAKE HAVEN
  • Who funds DENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE
  • Who funds Paws With A Cause
  • Who funds VERDE VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds HELP FROM MY FRIENDS INC
  • Who funds Friends of Foothills Animal Shelter
  • Who funds THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF BOULDER VALLEY INC
  • Who funds EASTSHORE HUMANE ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds MACKENZIE'S ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC
  • Who funds PETS FOR THE ELDERLY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CAT CARE SOCIETY
  • Who funds FORT MICHILIMACKINAC PAGEANT INC
  • Who funds YAVAPAI HUMANE SOCIETY
  • Who funds LIFELINE PET RESCUE
  • Who funds GOLDEN RETRIEVER RESCUE OF THE ROCKIES
  • Who funds DAUNTLESS RESCUE INC
  • Who funds BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds The August Foundation for Alaska Racing Dogs
  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN PUBLIC MEDIA INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Pedigree FoundationTN17.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Pedigree Foundation · The Duffield Family Foundation Dba Maddie's Fund · Petsmart Charities Inc · BISSELL Pet Foundation · Arizona Community Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Network for Good · Edward Jones Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Baird Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Lundstrom Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Lundstrom Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Lundstrom Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph