Skip to content
Luke 1034 Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Luke 1034 Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$448k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Health$501kEducation$350kHuman Services$57kHousing & Shelter$45kAnimals$15kRecreation & Sports$10kArts & Culture$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $37k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $150k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$12,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$165k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HEALING TRANSITIONS$250,000
GLENWOOD FAMILY MINISTRIES$150,000
FELLOWSHIP HOUSE$15,000
THERE IS AN ANSWER INC$12,000
Individual grant recipient$10,250
SPCA OF WAKE COUNTY$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $27k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 6% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MABOPANE FOUNDATION: $25k → 9%CHILDREN'S BLANKETS OF LOVE: $1k → 13%CHILDREN'S BLANKETS OF LOVE: $500 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$859k · 6 repeat orgs$141k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +17% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
9

Total granted

$859k
$120k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+10%

Still filing today

67%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HA
    HOPE ACADEMY GSO INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $350k · revenue +17%
  • HEALING TRANSITIONS INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $310k · revenue -32%
  • FH
    FELLOWSHIP HOUSE
    3× · 2023–2025 · $142k

Funded once

  • Mabopane Foundation
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -6%
  • RH
    RALEIGH HOUSING FUND INC
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue -2%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $19k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
WakeMed

The mission of wakemed is to improve the health and well-being of our community with outstanding and compassionate care to all.

Health
2
Anson County Homes of Hope

Provide short-term housing for homeless

Housing & Shelter
3
Southlight Healthcare Inc

Southlight healthcare provides access to high-quality mental health and substance use treatment, fostering a resilient community by supporting individuals in their recovery.

Health
4
Hospice of Wake County Inc

To care for individuals and families with compassion, support, and expertise as they navigate the end of life or life-changing illness.

—
5
New Hope Shelter

Provide homeless with individualized support services and tailored housing solutions with a goal of obtaining and maintaining affordable housing

Housing & Shelter
6
Humane Society of Raleigh County Inc

The humane society of raleigh county is dedicated to providing a safe haven for homeless and neglected animals. we offer adoption services spay/neuter programs, and community outreach to ensure the well being of pets and their families.…

Animals
7
House of Hope

We assist young mothers with housing and wrap around services.

Human Services
8
Hospice of Wake County Foundation Inc

Foundation supports and operates for the benefit of and to carry out the purposes of hospice of wake county, inc, a 501(c)(3) organization

—
9
Family Promise of Wake County Inc

Moving families at risk of or experiencing homelessness into sustainable, permanent housing in our community through a continuum of support services.

Housing & Shelter
10
House of Hope

Assisting and housing females in recovery

—
11
Hope House Rescue Mission Inc

Hope house rescue mission strives to eliminate homelessness. our mission is "to break the cycle of poverty and despair... one life at a time." we provide physical, emotional, mental and spiritual resources regardless of race, religion or…

Human Services
12
Boys & Girls Homes of Nc Inc

To provide out-of-home care for at-risk children in residential care, family foster care and adoption. the program of care includes educational, social and spiritual development.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Healing Transitions Inc; the most unlike its peers is Mabopane Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HEALING TRANSITIONS INC: $310,000 · HealthHEALING TRANSITIONS INC1 OF US: $28,750 · Health1 OF US+2 more: $20,000 · Health+2 moreHOPE ACADEMY GSO INC: $350,000 · EducationHOPE ACADEMY GSO INCFELLOWSHIP HOUSE: $142,200 · OtherFELLOWSHIP HOUSETHERE IS AN ANSWER INC: $27,000 · OtherTHERE IS AN ANSWER INCRALEIGH HOUSING FUND INC: $20,000 · OtherRALEIGH HOUSING FUND INCIndividual grant recipient: $18,996 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $10,250 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY: $10,000 · OtherPAWFECT MATCH RESCUE: $10,000 · OtherTEEN VALLEY RANCH CHRISTIAN CAMP: $10,000 · Other+3 more: $11,500 · OtherMabopane Foundation: $25,000 · Human ServicesCHILDRENS BLANKETS OF LOVE: $1,500 · Human ServicesSOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS WAKE COUNTY INC: $5,000 · Animals
Health$358,750Education$350,000Other$259,946Human Services$26,500Animals$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOPE ACADEMY GSO INC: $350,000 over 3y, 7.9% of budgetHEALING TRANSITIONS INC: $310,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budget1 OF US: $28,750 over 2y, 6.1% of budgetMabopane Foundation: $25,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetRALEIGH HOUSING FUND INC: $20,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetRALEIGH-WAKE COUNTY DENTAL SOCIETY COMMUNITY DENTAL HEALTH PROGRAM INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS WAKE COUNTY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDRENS BLANKETS OF LOVE: $1,500 over 2y, 19% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Triangle Community Fo…Duke Energy FoundationNatl Christian Charit…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Triangle Community Foundation IncNC13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Triangle Community Foundation Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Luke 1034 Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Luke 1034 Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Luke 1034’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home