Skip to content

California · Private foundation

Lucille and Ronald Neeley Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$7.6M
Granted FY2019
9
Grants FY2019
7
Organizations funded FY2019
57%
First-time grantees FY2019
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Lucille and Ronald Neeley Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to National Philanthropic Trust, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2019, the last year Lucille and Ronald Neeley Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 5 organizations, $8M. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

7
’17
4
’18
5
’19
4
’20
0
’21
2
’22
0
’23
0
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Median grant, FY2019
$50,000
Largest grant, FY2019
$5,000,000
Organizations funded a year
4 to 9
FY2017 to FY2019
States reached, FY2019
2
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2019, 57% of the organizations Lucille and Ronald Neeley Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 66% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 34% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19
EducationScience & TechOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20197$7.6M57%
FY20184$5.7M25%
FY20179$1.5Mn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$11MPhilanthropy$9.1MArts & Culture$5.7MFood & Nutrition$251kHealth$50kScience & Tech$25kPublic Benefit$15kEducation$13kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2023, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 12 grantees

Plus 6 recipients with no EIN on record ($9.6M), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Lucille and Ronald Neeley Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetProject Concern International: $10,702,155 over 4y, 7.4% of budgetTheater & Arts Foundation of San Diego County Dba la Jolla Playhouse: $251,500 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetSan Diego Hunger Coalition: $250,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInstallation Gallery: $47,500 over 2y, 20% of budgetArt of Elan: $30,000 over 2y, 9.4% of budgetThe Salk Institute for Biological Studies: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVoice of San Diego: $15,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetHigh Tech High Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetFoundation of La Jolla High School Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetChildren Helping Children Intl: $2,000 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetBlaine County Hunger Coalition Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 12.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Foundation of San DiegoCA21.6× affinity8 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · The San Diego Foundation · Sempra Foundation · The Intuit Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Lucille and Ronald Neeley Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Lucille and Ronald Neeley Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Lucille and Ronald Neeley Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Lucille and Ronald Neeley Foundation

How much does Lucille and Ronald Neeley Foundation give?
Lucille and Ronald Neeley Foundation reported 9 grants totaling $7,608,500 in its FY2019 IRS filing. It funded between 4 and 9 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2019.
What does Lucille and Ronald Neeley Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2023, its largest causes are International (41%), Philanthropy (35%), Arts & Culture (22%).
Who are Lucille and Ronald Neeley Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2023: Project Concern International ($11M), Theater & Arts Foundation of San Diego County Dba la Jolla Playhouse ($252k), San Diego Hunger Coalition ($250k).
Does Lucille and Ronald Neeley Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2019, 57% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Lucille and Ronald Neeley Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Lucille and Ronald Neeley Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego, The San Diego Foundation, Sempra Foundation.
Where is Lucille and Ronald Neeley Foundation based?
Lucille and Ronald Neeley Foundation is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lucille and Ronald Neeley’s filings →

More from the funding graph