· Private foundation
Lubrano Family Charitable Foundation Emmett Lyne Trustee C/O Rich May PC
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 40% of LUBRANO FAMILY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION EMMETT LYNE TRUSTEE C/O RICH MAY PC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k82 grants · $89k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $55k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| KRIPALU | $34,000 |
| RUNWAY FOR RECOVERY | $21,000 |
| WESTOVER SCHOOL | $5,000 |
| COLBY SAWYER COLLEGE | $5,000 |
| FORK UNION MILITARY ACADEMY | $5,000 |
| MAIN STREET CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH | $5,000 |
| BREAKTHROUGH MANCHESTER | $3,300 |
| STEVE GLIDDEN FOUNDATION | $3,250 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,500 |
| POSITIVE TRACKS | $2,115 |
| HANOVER CONSERVANCY | $2,096 |
| HILTON WINN FARM | $2,000 |
| PEMBROKE HISTORICAL SOCIETY | $2,000 |
| FRIENDS OF ATHLETICS- COLBY COLLEGE | $2,000 |
| SALT WATER VINEYARD CHURCH | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $116k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.
110 repeat relationships — 75 still active in FY2025, 35 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- RFRUNWAY FOR RECOVERY INC6× · 2017–2025 · $94k · revenue ×17
ST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY6× · 2017–2025 · $52k · revenue +4%- WSWESTOVER SCHOOL INC6× · 2017–2025 · $48k · revenue +43%
Funded once
- CFCRAPANZANO FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $6k · revenue ×14
- BTBRIDGES TO COMMUNITY INCone grant, 2017 · $6k · revenue +0%
- MSMAIN ST CONGREGATIONAL CHURCHone grant, 2017 · $6k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.
Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…
Saint anselm is a catholic, benedictine college providing all of its students a distinctive liberal arts education that incorporates opportunities for professional and career preparation. it does so in a learning community that encourages…
Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…
Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…
To enhance, every day, the health of our patients, our families and our communities. We do that through a range of health care services for people of all ages, in a variety of care settings.
Our mission is to ensure that the people of greater boston benefit from a vibrant, resilient, and inclusive waterfront, harbor, and islands; these spaces are equitable, accessible, and adapted to climate change; and to ensure our public,…
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
The nantucket conservation foundation owns, protects, and stewards over 9,000 acres of land and coastal shoreline, conserves nantucket's rare and significant natural resources, and engages in impactful ecological research to inform…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Center for Grieving Children and the most unlike its peers is Crapanzano Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
130 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 130 of the 258 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds RUNWAY FOR RECOVERY INC ↗
- Who funds ST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds WESTOVER SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds HANOVER CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds Colby-Sawyer College ↗
- Who funds STEVE GLIDDEN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds PEMBROKE HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds YOUTH ENRICHMENT CENTER HILTON-WINN ↗
- Who funds The President and Trustees of Colby College ↗
- Who funds POSITIVE TRACKS INC ↗
- Who funds DERBY ACADEMY TRUSTEES ↗
- Who funds THE DERRYFIELD SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds MOOSE POND ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds HOLDERNESS SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds POUGHKEEPSIE FARM PROJECT ↗
- Who funds Bowdoin College ↗
- Who funds EMPOWER GRIEVING CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds HARLEM LACROSSE AND LEADERSHIP CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds CRAPANZANO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BRIDGES TO COMMUNITY INC ↗
- Who funds BRIDGTON COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC ↗
- Who funds BELMONT HILL SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds LARRY LABONTE RECOVERY CENTER ↗
- Who funds GOVERNOR DUMMER ACADEMY THE GOVERNOR'S ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds GOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · The Couch Family Foundation · Mascoma Bank Foundation · Eastern Bank Foundation · Arbella Insurance Foundation · Agnes M Lindsay Trust · Amica Companies Foundation · Hypertherm Hope Foundation Inc · Emily Landecker Foundation Inc · Dartmouth-Hitchcock Clinic · Claremont Savings Bank Foundation · The Rhode Island Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Lubrano Family Charitable Foundation Emmett Lyne Trustee C/O Rich May PC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Dove Inc — 60% of income from government
- Dismas of Vermont Inc — 39% of income from government
- Upper Valley Haven — 38% of income from government
- More Than Words Inc — 24% of income from government
- Osamequin Farm Inc — 18% of income from government
- Willing Hands Enterprises Inc — 17% of income from government
- Children's Hospital Corporation — 10% of income from government
- Our Neighbors' Table Inc — 8% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- Vital Communities Inc — 5% of income from government
- South Shore Hospital Inc — 5% of income from government
- Learning Ally Inc — 4% of income from government
- Essex Winter Series Inc — 3% of income from government
- Cover Home Repair Inc — 3% of income from government
- Planned Parenthood of Northern New England Inc — 2% of income from government
- The Trustees of Reservations — 2% of income from government
- Governor Dummer Academy the Governor's Academy — 1% of income from government
- Biodiversityworks Inc — 0% of income from government
- Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc — 0% of income from government
- Steppingstone Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.