· Public charity
Loyola Marymount University
Organization's mission LOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY maintains a three-fold mission: 1)the encouragement of learning, 2) the education of the whole person, and 3)the service of faith and the promotion of justice.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 4 grants below total $146,550 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $172,980,508 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $172,833,958 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $10k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $32k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $105k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LOS ANGELES AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE | $104,650 |
| BALLONA DISCOVERY PARK PARTNERS | $20,000 |
| ACADEMY FOUNDATION | $12,000 |
| BUILD A MIRACLE | $9,900 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 94% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
3 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $42k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LALOS ANGELES AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE4× · 2022–2025 · $317k · revenue +16%
Teach for America Inc6× · 2017–2023 · $115k · revenue -3%- RAROMAN ARCHBISHOP OF LOS ANGELES A CORPORATION SOLE3× · 2021–2024 · $58k
Funded once
- NCNATIONAL CATHOLIC EDUCATIONAL ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2018 · $30k
- AOARCHDIOCESE OF LOS ANGELES EDUCATION & WELFARE CORPORATIONone grant, 2022 · $15k
- EDECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF LOS ANGELES COUNTYone grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +2%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…
To enhance the professionalism and clinical autonomy of physicians to allow them to advocate for their patients and the health of the community of los angeles.
Advance and support efforts that eliminate barriers and maximize opportunities for economic prosperity.
The Television Academy is dedicated to celebrating excellence, innovation and the advancement of the telecommunications arts and sciences through recognition, education and leadership, while fostering a diverse, inclusive and accessible…
To improve the skills, wages, and working conditions of workers in the tourism industry and to assure that the benefits of tourism contribute equitably to the economic and social development of all communities in the greater los angeles…
The AIA California, in collaboration with local components, is the voice of the architectural profession.
Lcda serves as an advocate and resource to corporate boards, search firms, private equity, and institutional investors interested in gaining access to exceptional latino board talent.
Advance the prosperity of l.a.'s visitor economy and the livelihoods that depend on it. as the official destination marketing organization for the city of los angeles, conduct worldwide sales and marketing efforts focused on the meetings &…
We inspire and educate young minds through engaging science-based programs and exhibits to create a meaningful impact on the communities we serve.
Through its exhibitions and outreach programs, the institute of contemporary art, los angeles fosters diversity, innovation, and discovery in contemporary art - local, national, and international.
The los angeles business council, labc, serves the los angeles community by providing public education, awareness to community issues, advocacy of sustainable development, workforce housing and business development.
Bioscience los angeles county or biosciencela was formed in 2018 to create, enable, and promote an enviable, thriving, and vibrant life sciences ecosystem in greater los angeles to produce economic and societal benefits in the region.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lax Coastal Area Chamber of Commerce and the most unlike its peers is International Orthodox Theological Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LOS ANGELES AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
- Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
- Who funds BALLONA DISCOVERY PARK PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds ACADEMY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY ↗
- Who funds ACCESSURF HAWAII INC ↗
- Who funds ISHA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL ORTHODOX THEOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds BUILD A MIRACLE ↗
- Who funds LAX COASTAL AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY LAW LIBRARY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Loyola Marymount University funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.