Skip to content

Colorado · Private foundation

Love in Action

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$16M
Granted FY2023
2
Grants FY2023
2
Organizations funded FY2023
50%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2023
$15,750,000
Largest grant, FY2023
$15,750,000
Organizations funded a year
2 to 18
FY2021 to FY2023
States reached, FY2023
2
Total assets, FY2023
$109M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 50% of the organizations Love in Action funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23
EducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20232$16M50%
FY202210$12M50%
FY202118$4.1Mn/a
97% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2023.

Religion$28MEducation$1.4MHuman Services$1.2MInternational$230kEmployment$25kPublic Benefit$10kHealth$5kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

IA
OH
PA
CA
CO
NE
MD
AZ
KS
OK
GA
TX
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2021 to FY2023, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Ligonier Ministries Inc$1,325,0002n/a
Augustine Institute Inc$1,248,00023%
Global Media Outreach$1,120,00028%
Focus on the Family$1,094,5002n/a
The Seminar Network Inc$1,000,00012%
Hope International$150,00011%
Morning Star Development$50,00012%
Love Justice International$30,00020%
Hope Haven Inc$25,00010%
Harvest Bridge$20,00013%
Show all 12 grantees
All grantees of Love in Action by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Ligonier Ministries Inc$1,325,0002n/a
Augustine Institute Inc$1,248,00023%
Global Media Outreach$1,120,00028%
Focus on the Family$1,094,5002n/a
The Seminar Network Inc$1,000,00012%
Hope International$150,00011%
Morning Star Development$50,00012%
Love Justice International$30,00020%
Hope Haven Inc$25,00010%
Harvest Bridge$20,00013%
Truth for Life$10,00010%
Arthritis Foundation Inc$5,35010%

Plus 12 recipients with no EIN on record ($25M), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Love in Action supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAugustine Institute Inc: $1,248,000 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetGlobal Media Outreach: $1,120,000 over 2y, 7.9% of budgetThe Seminar Network Inc: $1,000,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetHope International: $150,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMorning Star Development: $50,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetLove Justice International: $30,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetHope Haven Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHarvest Bridge: $20,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetTruth for Life: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetArthritis Foundation Inc: $5,350 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 10.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Servant FoundationKS14.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Love in Action with peer funders

About Love in Action

How much does Love in Action give?
Love in Action reported 2 grants totaling $15,752,500 in its FY2023 IRS filing. It funded between 2 and 18 organizations a year over FY2021 to FY2023.
What does Love in Action fund?
By grant dollars over FY2021 to FY2023, its largest causes are Religion (91%), Education (5%), Human Services (4%).
Who are Love in Action's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2021 to FY2023: Ligonier Ministries Inc ($1.3M), Augustine Institute Inc ($1.2M), Global Media Outreach ($1.1M).
Does Love in Action fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 50% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Love in Action accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Love in Action?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Servant Foundation, Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc, National Philanthropic Trust.
Where is Love in Action based?
Love in Action is based in CO.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Love in Action’s filings →

More from the funding graph