· Public charity
Louisiana Public Health Institute
Lphi leads and partners with communities to ensure that everyone has fair and just opportunities to be healthy and well.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| START CORPORATION | $13,000 |
| BAPTIST COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES | $12,500 |
| CAPITOL CITY FAMILY HEALTH CENTER CARESOUTH | $12,500 |
| BATON ROUGE PRIMARY CARE COLLABORATIVE | $12,500 |
| INCLUSIVE CARE | $12,500 |
| PLAQUEMINES PRIMARY CARE | $12,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $47k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 7% of Louisiana Public Health Institute’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 96% of the giving stays in LA; read by stated purpose it is 89% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
14 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SCSTART Corporation6× · 2017–2025 · $75k · revenue +498%
- LCLASALLE COMMUNITY ACTION ASSOCIATION INC2× · 2021–2022 · $60k · revenue +22%
- BRBaton Rouge Primary Care Collaborative Inc3× · 2023–2025 · $33k · revenue +74%
Funded once
- AOACTS OF LOVE INCone grant, 2024 · $25k
- BMBK MENTORING INCone grant, 2024 · $25k
- CACANCER ASSOCIATION OF GREATER NEW ORLEANone grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +1%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide quality, comprehensive, compassionate, and culturally appropriate primary and preventive healthcare services to residents in medically underserved North Louisiana.
The Louisiana Primary Care Association, Inc. works to promote community based health services through advocacy, education, public awareness and leveraging resources.
To provide medical care to the disadvantaged and underserved.
The organization provides family centered, community oriented and comprehensive health services to the people in mound bayou, ms and the surrounding area.
To provide medical are and health programs by operating a 49 bed facility and 4 Rural Health Clinics (RHC) for Hospital Service District 2 of Beauregard Parish and 5 physician clinics; recruit and employ physicians in HPSA.
To improve health status through access to information, education, & health services.
To provide primary care to an under served rural area.
To provide primary preventive health services to the medically insured, underinsured & underserved population of Iberville and surrounding areas regardless of ability to pay and increase the span of healthy life, reduce hlth disparities…
To provide world class health services so that our neighbors can live physically, mentally, and spiritually healthier lives.
Federally Qualified Health Center The Organization provides medical and dental services to all community members regardless of income level.
To provide high quality, customer oriented and cost effective healthcare services in a safe and accessible environment to all persons of Holmes, Madison, Leflore counties, and surrounding communities.
Our mission is to provide patient centered medical and behavioral health services to our community. As a nonprofit organization, we provide these services to all persons, including our communitys most vulnerable - regardless of financial…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Opelousas General Health System Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Inclusive Care Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 19 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 15% of your grantees by number, and just 15% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds START Corporation ↗
- Who funds LASALLE COMMUNITY ACTION ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds Pre-K and Beyond ↗
- Who funds Capitol City Family Health Center Inc ↗
- Who funds Baton Rouge Primary Care Collaborative Inc ↗
- Who funds OPELOUSAS GENERAL HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CANCER ASSOCIATION OF GREATER NEW ORLEAN ↗
- Who funds HIV-AIDS Alliance for Region Two Inc ↗
- Who funds MOREHOUSE HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NEW ORLEANS MUSICIANS ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BAPTIST COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds THE UNITED HANDS YOUTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds DELTA INTERFAITH ↗
- Who funds GOCARE INC ↗
- Who funds CONCORDIA LEARNING CENTER ↗
- Who funds JEFFERSON COMMUNITY HEALTH CARE CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds OPERATION RESTORATION ↗
- Who funds ODYSSEY HOUSE LOUISIANA INC ↗
- Who funds MQVN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP INC ↗
- Who funds LUKE'S HOUSE- A CLINIC FOR HEALING AND HOPE ↗
- Who funds EXCELTH INC ↗
- Who funds IBERIA COMPREHENSIVE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds Access Health Louisiana ↗
- Who funds COMMON GROUND HEALTH CLINIC ↗
- Who funds CHILDRENS COALITION FOR NORTHEAST LOUISIANA ↗
- Who funds Adapt Inc ↗
- Who funds GIRLIE GIRLS MENTORING PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds Southeast Community Health Systems ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Direct Relief · The Greater New Orleans Foundation · The Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund · United Way of Southeast Louisiana · Americares Foundation Inc · The Rapides Foundation · New Orleans Community Support Foundation · Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Louisiana Foundation · Baptist Community Ministries · Second Harvest Food Bank Greater New Orleans and Acadiana · Delta Dental Community Care Foundation · Unity of Greater New Orleans Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Louisiana Public Health Institute funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.