How much did LOUISIANA PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE grant in FY2025?

LOUISIANA PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE reported 6 grants totaling $75,500 in its FY2025 IRS filing.

Where is LOUISIANA PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE based?

LOUISIANA PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE is based in LA.

LOUISIANA PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE

Foundation Dossiers Mostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

· Public charity

LOUISIANA PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE

Lphi uncovers complementary connections across sectors to combine (continued on schedule o) social, economic and human capital needed to align action for health.

$76k

Granted FY2025

Grants

Communities

$13k

Largest

01What you fund

0167% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2021–2025.

Health$236kEducation$86kHuman Services$78kArts & Culture$23kReligion$20kInternational$15kHousing & Shelter$10kOther$232k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2021

community-based addressingaddressing impactsimpacts covidcovid orleansorleans parishchange systemicsystemic inequities

2022

attainfullincrease statesstates systemicsystemic barriersbarriers inequitiesinequities impact

2023

change systemicsystemic inequitiespolicy changemobilize leadersleaders ruralrural buildbuild grassroots

2024

mobilize leadersleaders ruralrural buildbuild grassrootsgrassroots policypolicy change

2025

—

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$12,500

Median grant

States reached

$6.0M

Total assets

Largest grants

START CORPORATION$13,000
BATON ROUGE PRIMARY CARE COLLABORATIVE$12,500
PLAQUEMINES PRIMARY CARE$12,500
BAPTIST COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES$12,500
INCLUSIVE CARE$12,500
CAPITOL CITY FAMILY HEALTH CENTER CARESOUTH$12,500

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–22, $28k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19% — the area typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$450k · 14 repeat orgs$250k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +77% since the first grant, against +55% for the ones you funded once.

14 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$450k

$237k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+77%

+55%

Still filing today

79%

61%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthEducationHuman ServicesReligionHousing & ShelterInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

SC
START CORPORATION
5× · 2021–2025 · $68k · revenue +109%
LC
LASALLE COMMUNITY ACTION INC
2× · 2021–2022 · $60k · revenue +90%
PK
PRE K-12 AND BEYOND
4× · 2021–2024 · $50k · revenue +77%

Funded once

CA
CANCER ASSOCIATION OF GREATER NEW ORLEANSgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +60%
BM
BK MENTORING
one grant, 2024 · $25k
AO
ACTS OF LOVE
one grant, 2024 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Louisiana Primary Care Association Inc

The Louisiana Primary Care Association, Inc. works to promote community based health services through advocacy, education, public awareness and leveraging resources.

Health

Primary Health Services Center Inc

To provide quality, comprehensive, compassionate, and culturally appropriate primary and preventive healthcare services to residents in medically underserved North Louisiana.

Health

St Gabriel Health Clinic Inc

To provide primary preventive health services to the medically insured, underinsured & underserved population of Iberville and surrounding areas regardless of ability to pay and increase the span of healthy life, reduce hlth disparities…

Health

Delta Health Center Inc

The organization provides family centered, community oriented and comprehensive health services to the people of mound bayou, ms and the surrounding areas.

—

West Louisiana Health Services Inc

To provide medical are and health programs by operating a 49 bed facility and 4 Rural Health Clinics (RHC) for Hospital Service District 2 of Beauregard Parish and 5 physician clinics; recruit and employ physicians in HPSA.

Health

Louisiana Community Health Center

To provide world class health services so that our neighbors can live physically, mentally, and spiritually healthier lives.

Health

Rapides Primary Health Care Center Inc

To provide quality, affordable health and human services with dignity and respect to the undeserved and targeted population in Rapides Parish.

—

Swla Center for Health Services

To provide medical care to the disadvantaged and underserved.

—

Neighborhood Healthcare

Neighborhood Healthcare is committed to providing quality health care and promoting wellness to everyone in our communities, focusing on those most in need.

—

Dr Arenia C Mallory Community Health Center Inc

To provide high quality, customer oriented and cost effective healthcare services in a safe and accessible environment to all persons of Holmes, Madison, Leflore counties, and surrounding communities.

—

Community Health Care Inc

Federally Qualified Health Center The Organization provides medical and dental services to all community members regardless of income level.

—

Southwest Louisiana Area Health

To improve health status through access to information, education, & health services.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Common Ground Health Clinic and the most unlike its peers is Inclusive Care Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 18 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 15% of your grantees by number, and just 15% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/33

the rest of the field

13%

1,892/15,086

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

25 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

23/25

Grantees still filing

20/25

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Health$235,749Other$232,250Education$86,475Human Services$78,000Arts & Culture$22,500Religion$20,000International$15,000Housing & Shelter$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Direct ReliefCA33.9× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Direct Relief · The Greater New Orleans Foundation · The Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund · United Way of Southeast Louisiana · Americares Foundation Inc · New Orleans Community Support Foundation · Baptist Community Ministries · Delta Dental Community Care Foundation · Junior League of New Orleans Inc · The Rapides Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation LOUISIANA PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: DELTA INTERFAITH.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

3 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 843565409 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on DELTA INTERFAITH, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 9% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Louisiana Public Health Institute?

Find your warmest path to Louisiana Public Health Institute through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

LOUISIANA PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

25 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Louisiana Public Health Institute?

More from the funding graph

LOUISIANA PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

25 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Louisiana Public Health Institute?

More from the funding graph