· Public charity
Unity of Greater New Orleans Inc
The mission of unity of greater new orleans is to coordinate community partnerships to prevent, reduce and end homelessness.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 31 grants below total $25,292,059 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $28,076,441 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $2,784,382 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k2 grants · $62k
- $50k–250k9 grants · $1.3M
- $250k+20 grants · $24M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| START CORPORATION | $5,632,790 |
| TRAVELERS AID | $3,321,527 |
| RESPONSIBILITY HOUSE | $2,469,563 |
| NOAIDS TASKFORCE | $2,345,220 |
| OZANAM INN | $1,376,357 |
| EASTERSEALS | $1,271,727 |
| NATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS | $1,271,015 |
| DEPAUL USA | $765,644 |
| ODYSSEY HOUSE | $744,602 |
| PRIORITY HEALTH CARE | $614,478 |
| VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA | $578,835 |
| THE LADIES OF HOPE MINISTRIES INC | $514,029 |
| EDEN HOUSE | $490,010 |
| VIALINK | $387,707 |
| NEW ORLEANS FAMILY JUSTICE CENTER | $381,727 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $32.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 23%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +51% since the first grant, against +36% for the ones you funded once.
35 repeat relationships — 28 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $901k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SCSTART Corporation9× · 2017–2025 · $25M · revenue +498%
- NTNOAIDS TASK FORCE9× · 2017–2025 · $17M · revenue +107%
- RHRESPONSIBILITY HOUSE INC9× · 2017–2025 · $15M · revenue +18% · 63% of their budget
Funded once
- BHBRIDGE HOUSE CORPORATIONone grant, 2017 · $131k · revenue +7%
- PLPROJECT LAZARUSone grant, 2017 · $48k · revenue -6%
- LALOUIS ARMSTRONG FAMILY SERVICESone grant, 2017 · $28k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Capital Area Alliance for the Homeless (CAAH) holds the fundamental belief that everyone, no matter how deprived in circumstances of housing and necessities is valued, entitled to dignity and respect, and deserving of community…
Neighborhood housing services of new orleans, inc. revitalizes communities by increasing the number of homeowners and transforming vacant or substandard properties into sustainable homeownership. we improve quality of life through informed…
Provides housing for elderly and disabled persons and families under section 207/223(f) of the national housing act under an agreement with the department of hud.
To create decent, affordable housing for those in need
Terrebonne arc is committed to securing for all people with intellectual and developmental disabilities the opportunity to develop, function, live and enjoy life to their fullest potential with dignity.
Provides housing and support services to individuals and families impacted by hiv/aids
Provide low cost housing to handicapped adults
Acadiana outreach center, inc. provides shelter and support to help the poor and homeless rebuild their lives.
To identify, advocate, and mobilize community resources to ensure all people in central louisiana have access to stable homes.
To provide transitional shelter for homeless women and their dependent children while these women are receiving the necessary training and skills to become self sufficient
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is 3222 Canal Street Apartments Nonprofit Inc and the most unlike its peers is First Evangelist Housing & Community Dev Corp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 14% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 18% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds START Corporation ↗
- Who funds NOAIDS TASK FORCE ↗
- Who funds RESPONSIBILITY HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds TRAVELERS AID SOCIETY OF GREATER NEW ORLEANS ↗
- Who funds NEW ORLEANS FAMILY JUSTICE ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds OZANAM INN ↗
- Who funds NAMI NEW ORLEANS INC ↗
- Who funds ODYSSEY HOUSE LOUISIANA INC ↗
- Who funds COVENANT HOUSE NEW ORLEANS ↗
- Who funds GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF SOUTHEASTERN LOUISIANA INC ↗
- Who funds VIA LINK INC ↗
- Who funds DEPAUL USA INC ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES ARCHDIOCESE OF NEW ORLEANS ↗
- Who funds NEW ORLEANS WOMEN & CHILDREN'S SHELTER INC ↗
- Who funds UNITY HOUSING INC ↗
- Who funds METRO CENTERS FOR COMMUNITY ADVOCACY INC ↗
- Who funds PRIORITY HEALTH CARE INC ↗
- Who funds First Evangelist Housing & Community Dev Corp ↗
- Who funds DR MWMCCALEB EDUCATIONAL FUND ↗
- Who funds THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND ↗
- Who funds EDEN CENTERS ↗
- Who funds THE HARRY TOMPSON CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Resources for Human Development Inc ↗
- Who funds 3222 CANAL STREET APARTMENTS NONPROFIT INC ↗
- Who funds THE LADIES OF HOPE MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHEAST LOUISIANA LEGAL SERVICES CORP ↗
- Who funds GRACE AT THE GREEN LIGHT INC ↗
- Who funds OPERATION RESTORATION ↗
- Who funds SHELTER RESOURCES INC ↗
- Who funds BRIDGE HOUSE CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds 2222 TULANE AVENUE APARTMENTS NONPROFIT INC ↗
- Who funds PROJECT LAZARUS ↗
- Who funds ST VINCENT DEPAUL ARCHDIOCESAN COUNCIL OF NEW ORLEANS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Greater New Orleans Foundation · Baptist Community Ministries · United Way of Southeast Louisiana · Second Harvest Food Bank Greater New Orleans and Acadiana · Goldring Family Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Keller Family Foundation · New Orleansartists Against Hunger and Homelessness · Junior League of New Orleans Inc · New Orleans Community Support Foundation · Methodist Health System Foundation Inc · Gustaf Westfeldt McIlhenny Family Founda
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Unity of Greater New Orleans Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.