· Public charity
Louisiana Bar Foundation
The LOUISIANA BAR FOUNDATION exists to preserve, honor, and improve our system of justice by funding, developing or otherwise promoting efforts which enhance the legal profession, increase public understanding of the legal system and advance the reality of equal justice.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $17k
- $10k–50k21 grants · $565k
- $50k–250k30 grants · $3.2M
- $250k+9 grants · $13M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ACADIANA LEGAL SERVICE CORPORATION | $5,089,490 |
| SOUTHEAST LOUISIANA LEGAL SERVICES | $3,901,563 |
| LAGNIAPPE LAW LAB | $842,500 |
| SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY LAW CENTER | $798,500 |
| LOUISIANA APPLESEED | $527,200 |
| THE PRO BONO PROJECT | $444,000 |
| BATON ROUGE BAR FOUNDATION | $314,500 |
| SHREVEPORT BAR FOUNDATION | $306,903 |
| THE WELLSPRING ALLIANCE FOR FAMILIES | $298,460 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES - DIOCESE OF BATON ROUGE | $246,236 |
| FAMILY JUSTICE CENTER OF CENTRAL LOUISIANA | $162,000 |
| DISABILITY RIGHTS LOUISIANA | $160,000 |
| PROJECT SAVE A PROGRAM OF CATHOLIC CHARITIES ARCHDIOCESE OF NEW ORLEANS | $157,786 |
| LAFAYETTE BAR FOUNDATION | $155,000 |
| NORTHEAST LOUISIANA BAR FOUNDATION | $144,250 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $8.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 22%, against an area that typically sits at 17%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +52% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.
60 repeat relationships — 51 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $979k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ALACADIANA LEGAL SERVICE CORPORATION9× · 2017–2025 · $28M · revenue +53% · 49% of their budget
- SLSOUTHEAST LOUISIANA LEGAL SERVICES CORP9× · 2017–2025 · $21M · revenue +138% · 27% of their budget
- TPTHE PRO BONO PROJECT9× · 2017–2025 · $1.9M · revenue +64% · 41% of their budget
Funded once
- LSLEGAL SERVICES OF NORTH LOUISIANAone grant, 2017 · $456k
- SNSAFETY NET FOR ABUSED PERSONS INCone grant, 2017 · $25k
- CACAPITAL AREA FAMILY VIOLENCE INTERVENTION CENTER INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +146%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Casa - new orleans trains volunteers to become court appointed special advocates for abused and neglected children in the juvenile justice system.
The Louisiana Capital Assistance Center is a New Orleans based non-profit law office established in 1993 as the Louisiana Crisis Assistance Center. The LCAC represents indigent individuals who are charged with capital crimes in Louisiana…
The organization is a partnership of agencies dedicated to ending family violence, child abuse, sexual assault, and stalking through prevention and coordinated response by providing comprehensive client-centered, empowerment services in a…
The Organization is dedicated to bringing about change in institutions, laws, politics, attitudes, and beliefs which will allow individuals to live free of violence.
Immigration Legal Services and Advocacy (ISLA) provides direct representation to indigent detained immigrants throughout Louisiana on a pro bono basis and under a universal representation model. ISLA provides information to the public to…
Child advocacy services gives voice, healing, and security to children in ten parishes in southeast louisiana through its casa program, children's advocacy program, and prevention education.
The Center for Children and Families, Inc. was organized for the advocacy of children in the court and foster care systems within the Fourth Judicial District of Louisiana, and to do any and all things germane, incidental and necessary to…
The legal aid justice center partners with communities and clients to achieve justice by dismantling systems that create and perpetuate poverty.
Provide children representation before the judicial system
Capital area family justice center, inc. (the organization) is a nonprofit corporation organized under the laws of louisiana on may 29, 2019. the corporation was formed for the purpose of empowering victims of family violence with…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Louisiana Guardianship Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Lower 9TH Ward Homeownership Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 18% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
76 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 76 of the 85 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ACADIANA LEGAL SERVICE CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds SOUTHEAST LOUISIANA LEGAL SERVICES CORP ↗
- Who funds THE PRO BONO PROJECT ↗
- Who funds LAGNIAPPE LAW LAB ↗
- Who funds BATON ROUGE BAR FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SHREVEPORT BAR FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LOYOLA UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds THE WELLSPRING ALLIANCE FOR FAMILIES INC ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES ARCHDIOCESE OF NEW ORLEANS ↗
- Who funds LAFAYETTE PARISH BAR FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LOUISIANA APPLESEED CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE INC ↗
- Who funds CHEZ HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF BATON ROUGE INC ↗
- Who funds INNOCENCE PROJECT NEW ORLEANS ↗
- Who funds DISABILITY RIGHTS LOUISIANA ↗
- Who funds METRO CENTERS FOR COMMUNITY ADVOCACY INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWEST LOUISIANA BAR FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Faith House Inc ↗
- Who funds The Haven Inc ↗
- Who funds PROJECT CELEBRATION INC ↗
- Who funds LOUISIANA CENTER FOR CHILDREN'S RIGHTS ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF NORTH LOUISIANA ↗
- Who funds FRONTLINE LEGAL SERVICES ↗
- Who funds LEGAL SERVICES OF NORTH LOUISIANA ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL LOUISIANA PRO BONO PROJECT ↗
- Who funds JUSTICE AND ACCOUNTABILITY CENTER OF LOUISIANA ↗
- Who funds FAMILY JUSTICE CENTER OF CENTRAL LOUISIANA INC ↗
- Who funds DART (DOMESTIC ABUSE RESISTANCE TEAM) ↗
- Who funds LOUISIANA CENTER FOR LAW AND CIVIC EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHEAST SPOUSE ABUSE PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds BEAUREGARD COMMUNITY CONCERNS INC ↗
- Who funds TRAINING EDUCATION AND MEDIATION FOR STUDENTS ↗
- Who funds NOAIDS TASK FORCE ↗
- Who funds NORTHEAST LOUISIANA BAR FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ST FRANCES CABRINI IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER ↗
- Who funds YOUTH SERVICE BUREAU OF ST TAMMANY ↗
- Who funds OASIS - A SAFE HAVEN FOR SURVIVORS OF DOMESTIC & SEXUAL VIOLENCE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Greater New Orleans Foundation · Louisiana Coalition Against Domestic Violence Inc · Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Louisiana Foundation · United Way of Southeast Louisiana · The Huey & Angelina Wilson Foundation · Foundation for Louisiana · Baptist Community Ministries · Louisiana Alliance of Childrens Advocacy Centers · Baton Rouge Area Foundation · Carolyn W & Charles T Beaird Family Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Christus Health
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Louisiana Bar Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Louisiana Bar Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Louisiana Bar Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.