· Private foundation
Lott-Conlon Foundation Pfdn
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k7 grants · $42k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SUNSHINE COMMUNITIES | $10,353 |
| Anne Grady Corporation | $8,796 |
| TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY RESOURCE CENTER | $7,860 |
| ANTHONY WAYNE YOUTH FOUNDATION | $6,800 |
| CONNECTING PEOPLE AND PLACES | $5,000 |
| THE 577 FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| WATERVILLE INCLUSIVE PARK PROJECT | $5,000 |
| IMAGINATION STATION | $3,289 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
4 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 10% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $47k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SFSUNSHINE FOUNDATION INC2× · 2021–2023 · $16k · revenue +4%
- 5F577 FOUNDATION2× · 2023–2025 · $12k · revenue +9%
- LILOTT INDUSTRIES INC2× · 2023–2024 · $7k · revenue +11%
Funded once
- LCLott Conlon Foundationone grant, 2022 · $38k
- BIBITTERSWEET INCone grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue +23%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2024 · $15k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Sunshine industries, inc. strives to enable people with developmental disabilities to achieve full potential and an enhanced quality of life.
Sunny Oaks provides 24 hour residential services, supported living, nutritional, community and training services for individuals with I/DD (Intellectual and/or Developmental Disabilities) referred by state and county governments. Services…
Dedicated to providing person-centered support for individuals with developmental disabilities that promote independence, inclusion, and empowerment to reach their personal version of happiness and life satisfaction.
To provide cost-effective residential, social, intellectual, physical and vocational services to individuals with autism in group homes and in home support.
At alvord-taylor, we are committed to creating a vibrant, inclusive community where individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities can thrive. through dedicated support and advocacy, we empower people to live fulfilling lives…
Sunflower adult day services provides care for adults with a wide range of disabling conditions including alzheimer's disease and other forms of dementia, stroke, parkinson's disease, frailty, depression, developmental disabilities, ms and…
Build rehabilitation industries, inc. dba buildability ("build"), provides services and support for people with developmental and intellectual disabilities, assisting them to achieve greater independence and inclusion in their communities.
The organization provides educational services for the developmentally disabled.
Day training for mentally handicapped adults and residential housing for mentally handicapped adults
To enhance independence, as well as community responsibility, and to foster self-esteem and dignity among individuals with developmental disabilities. program services include individualized skills and socialization(iss), supportive…
Sunnyhill, inc. provides tailored residential, recreational and educational opportunities for children and adults with developmental disabilities. in partnership with community and natural supports, sunnyhill empowers individuals to become…
Residential Services, Inc. provides living options and related supports to people with intellectual and developmental disabilities of all ages.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bittersweet Inc and the most unlike its peers is 577 Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SUNSHINE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BITTERSWEET INC ↗
- Who funds RALLYCAP SPORTS INC ↗
- Who funds 577 FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SUNSHINE COMMUNITIES ↗
- Who funds ANNE GRADY CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds ANNE GRADY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds ANTHONY WAYNE YOUTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LOTT INDUSTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds THE TOLEDO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds AUTISM MODEL COMMUNITY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds TOLEDO FOOTBALL ACADEMY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Toledo Community Foundation Inc · John Henry Eldred Jr Foundation · Dana Charitable Foundation · The O-I Charities Foundation · Elsie and Harry Baumker Charitable Foundation Inc · Good Shepherd Fdn of Ohio · The Andersons Fund Supporting Organization · Andersons Foundation · Bon Secours Mercy Health Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Lott-Conlon Foundation Pfdn funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.