Skip to content

· Private foundation

Long Family Foundation (Formerly Reid Long Scholarship Fund)

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$11k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Philanthropy$39kReligion$36kEducation$27kHealth$11kAnimals$4kArts & Culture$3kHuman Services$3kHousing & Shelter$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RUBY'S RAINBOW$4,000
THE CRIMSON TIDE FOUNDATION$3,300
NICK'S KIDS FOUNDATION$3,000
WEST FELICIANA HUMANE SOCIETY$500
EPISCOPAL CHURCH OF THE MESIAH$250
SOFO SOWAL FOUNDATION$250
PATH OF GRACE ADDICTION RECOVERY$112
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–23, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BIG OAK RANCH: $1k → 13%ANGEL HOUSE: $500 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
CA
AZ
TN
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$71k · 12 repeat orgs$52k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +42% since the first grant, against +40% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
35

Total granted

$71k
$48k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+40%

Still filing today

58%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsHealthArts & CulturePhilanthropyReligionHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RR
    RUBY'S RAINBOW
    6× · 2019–2024 · $18k · revenue +93%
  • NK
    NICK'S KIDS FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $17k · revenue +68%
  • SG
    SANDAL GAP STUDIO
    2× · 2019–2021 · $2k · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • HU
    HEFLIN UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2019 · $6k
  • TU
    TRINITY UNITED METHODIST
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • NF
    NASH FAMILY
    one grant, 2022 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Angies Dog House

We are dedicated to rescuig animals left homeless for whatever reason, animals in public shelters where they are at high risk of euthanasia, animals given up by their owners because of difficult circumstances, and those in danger of abuse…

Animals
2
Tails From Alabama

Rescue Dogs from Alabama

Animals
3
Aarf - Animal Angels Rescue Foundation

We are a small dog rescue organization specializing in the yorkie breed accepting dogs from local and regional shelters owners that can no longer care for their dogs and unclaimed strays providing all vet services placing dogs in foster…

Animals
4
Paws of Dixie Animal Rescue

We are an animal rescue in the deep south

Animals
5
Angel Dog Rescue Inc

The mission of Angel Dog Rescue, Inc is to rescue and provide humane treatment, medical care and homes for the homeless and abused dogs and cats in and around, but not limited to, Quitman County and surrounding counties in Georgia and…

Animals
6
The Dexter Foundation Dog Rescue

Dog Rescue

Animals
7
Abandoned to Adored

To rescue and rehome discarded dogs in marshall and benton counties in mississippi, striving to ensure these animals are healthy and to find them loving, forever homes so that they may live loved and safe.

Animals
8
Rebecca's Rainbow

Care for and adopt out the pets of sick or terminally ill persons and for the pets of deceased persons.

—
9
Fetch Cares

Care for disabled dogs and rescue dogs

Animals
10
Lil Rascals Dog Rescue

To save dogs and help them find homes.

Animals
11
Animal Alliance Rescue and Shelter

Pet adoptions and rescue

Animals
12
Little Dog Ranch Inc

Caring for medically challenged dogs

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sandal Gap Studio; the most unlike its peers is Bucket List Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/19
Grantees still filing
14/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TRINITY UMC: $15,000 · OtherTRINITY UMCALABASTER UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $7,000 · OtherALABASTER UNITED METHODIST CHURCHHEFLIN UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $6,000 · OtherHEFLIN UNITED METHODIST CHURCHTRINITY UNITED METHODIST: $5,000 · OtherTRINITY UNITED METHODISTNASH FAMILY: $3,500 · OtherWATKINS FAMILY: $3,500 · OtherCRIMSON TIDE FOUNDATION: $3,300 · Other+31 more: $31,057 · Other+31 moreRUBY'S RAINBOW: $18,000 · EducationRUBY'S RAINBOWNICK'S KIDS FOUNDATION INC: $17,000 · PhilanthropyNICK'S KIDS FOUN…Quarterbacking Children's Health Foundation: $1,000 · PhilanthropyQuarterbacking C…JACK'S BASKET: $2,000 · HealthATEAM MINISTRIES: $1,500 · HealthCOMMUNITY CARE INCORPORATED: $1,000 · HealthWest Feliciana Animal Humane Society Inc: $2,200 · AnimalsALAQUA ANIMAL REFUGE INC: $1,000 · AnimalsDOG HARMONY INC: $200 · Animals+1 more: $100 · AnimalsSANDAL GAP STUDIO: $2,200 · Arts & CultureDel Shores Foundation: $700 · Arts & CultureTHE EXCEPTIONAL FOUNDATION: $2,500 · Recreation & Sports
Other$74,357Education$18,000Philanthropy$18,000Health$4,500Animals$3,500Arts & Culture$2,900Recreation & Sports$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRUBY'S RAINBOW: $18,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetNICK'S KIDS FOUNDATION INC: $17,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTHE EXCEPTIONAL FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWest Feliciana Animal Humane Society Inc: $2,200 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetJACK'S BASKET: $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetATEAM MINISTRIES: $1,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBIG OAK RANCH INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetQuarterbacking Children's Health Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALAQUA ANIMAL REFUGE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLORY HOUSE GLOBAL OUTREACH: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetVESTAVIA HILLS HIGH SCHOOL PTO: $1,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetDel Shores Foundation: $700 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAngel House - Dar Al Malaak: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetDOG HARMONY INC: $200 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RUBY'S RAINBOW ↗
  • Who funds NICK'S KIDS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE EXCEPTIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds West Feliciana Animal Humane Society Inc ↗
  • Who funds SANDAL GAP STUDIO ↗
  • Who funds JACK'S BASKET ↗
  • Who funds BUCKET LIST FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ATEAM MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds BIG OAK RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds Quarterbacking Children's Health Foundation ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY CARE INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds ALAQUA ANIMAL REFUGE INC ↗
  • Who funds IN TOUCH MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds GLORY HOUSE GLOBAL OUTREACH ↗
  • Who funds VESTAVIA HILLS HIGH SCHOOL PTO ↗
  • Who funds Del Shores Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Pete M Hanna Charitable FoundationAL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Pete M Hanna Charitable Foundation · The Community Foundation of Greater Birmingham · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · Servant Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Long Family Foundation (Formerly Reid Long Scholarship Fund) funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Long Family Foundation (Formerly Reid Long Scholarship Fund). Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Long Family Foundation (Formerly Reid Long Scholarship Fund)’s filings →

    More from the funding graph