· Private foundation
Long Family Foundation (Formerly Reid Long Scholarship Fund)
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 58% of LONG FAMILY FOUNDATION (FORMERLY REID LONG SCHOLARSHIP FUND)’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| RUBY'S RAINBOW | $4,000 |
| THE CRIMSON TIDE FOUNDATION | $3,300 |
| NICK'S KIDS FOUNDATION | $3,000 |
| WEST FELICIANA HUMANE SOCIETY | $500 |
| EPISCOPAL CHURCH OF THE MESIAH | $250 |
| SOFO SOWAL FOUNDATION | $250 |
| PATH OF GRACE ADDICTION RECOVERY | $112 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–23, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +40% for the ones you funded once.
12 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- RRRUBY'S RAINBOW6× · 2019–2024 · $18k · revenue +93%
- NKNICK'S KIDS FOUNDATION INC5× · 2020–2024 · $17k · revenue +68%
- SGSANDAL GAP STUDIO2× · 2019–2021 · $2k · revenue +42%
Funded once
- HUHEFLIN UNITED METHODIST CHURCHone grant, 2019 · $6k
- TUTRINITY UNITED METHODISTone grant, 2018 · $5k
- WFWATKINS FAMILYone grant, 2022 · $4k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
We are dedicated to rescuig animals left homeless for whatever reason, animals in public shelters where they are at high risk of euthanasia, animals given up by their owners because of difficult circumstances, and those in danger of abuse…
Rescue Dogs from Alabama
We are a small dog rescue organization specializing in the yorkie breed accepting dogs from local and regional shelters owners that can no longer care for their dogs and unclaimed strays providing all vet services placing dogs in foster…
We are an animal rescue in the deep south
The mission of Angel Dog Rescue, Inc is to rescue and provide humane treatment, medical care and homes for the homeless and abused dogs and cats in and around, but not limited to, Quitman County and surrounding counties in Georgia and…
Dog Rescue
To rescue and rehome discarded dogs in marshall and benton counties in mississippi, striving to ensure these animals are healthy and to find them loving, forever homes so that they may live loved and safe.
Care for and adopt out the pets of sick or terminally ill persons and for the pets of deceased persons.
Care for disabled dogs and rescue dogs
To save dogs and help them find homes.
Pet adoptions and rescue
Caring for medically challenged dogs
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sandal Gap Studio and the most unlike its peers is Bucket List Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds RUBY'S RAINBOW ↗
- Who funds NICK'S KIDS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE EXCEPTIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds West Feliciana Animal Humane Society Inc ↗
- Who funds SANDAL GAP STUDIO ↗
- Who funds JACK'S BASKET ↗
- Who funds BUCKET LIST FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ATEAM MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds Quarterbacking Children's Health Foundation ↗
- Who funds BIG OAK RANCH INC ↗
- Who funds VESTAVIA HILLS HIGH SCHOOL PTO ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY CARE INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds IN TOUCH MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds ALAQUA ANIMAL REFUGE INC ↗
- Who funds Del Shores Foundation ↗
- Who funds Angel House - Dar Al Malaak ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Pete M Hanna Charitable Foundation · The Community Foundation of Greater Birmingham · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · Servant Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Long Family Foundation (Formerly Reid Long Scholarship Fund) funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.