· Private foundation
Lockheed Martin Employee Charity Fund
Its FY2023 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k31 grants · $162k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $137k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK | $38,709 |
| MEALS ON WHEELS TARRANT COUNTY | $35,000 |
| VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION | $35,000 |
| GRAND PRAIRIE UNITED CHARITIES | $17,998 |
| OUCHITA COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER AUX | $10,000 |
| EAST TEXAS CANCER ALLIANCE | $9,330 |
| DETACHMENT MARINE CORP LEAGUE | $9,330 |
| ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION OF LUFKIN | $9,330 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF DEEP EAST | $9,330 |
| JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF ANGELINA | $9,330 |
| FAMILY CRISIS CENTER | $9,330 |
| KURTH MEMORIAL ANIMAL SHELTER | $9,330 |
| HAROLD'S HOUSE EAST TEXAS ALLIANCE | $9,330 |
| IMPACT LUFKIN | $9,330 |
| CHRISTIAN SPORTS ASSOCIATION | $7,555 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $91k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 80% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
37 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2023, 21 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 48% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $157k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- NTNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK7× · 2017–2023 · $486k · revenue +105%
- GPGRAND PRAIRIE UNITED CHARITES INC6× · 2017–2023 · $148k · revenue +10%
- BTBRIGHTER TOMORROWS INC4× · 2017–2020 · $58k · revenue +89%
Funded once
- BTBRIGHTER TOMORROWS SHELTERone grant, 2021 · $18k
- VMVNA MEALS ON WHEELSone grant, 2017 · $10k
- DODefenders of Freedomgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $7k · revenue +34%
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Lone Star CASA elevates the voices of children in Kaufman and Rockwall County who have experienced abuse and neglect by providing trained volunteer advocates to work alongside children and families so they can achieve safety and stability…
Empowers older and disabled adults to live independentlly in thier own homes by providing nutritious home-delivered meals, safety checks, socialization, and community connection, which result in an enhanced quality of life and purpose as…
Los alamos visiting nurse service, inc. is dedicated to maintaining delivery of the highest quality of home care and hospice service to the residents of los alamos county and the northern new mexico service area.
To nourish and enrich the lives of the homebound and other people in need through programs that promote dignity and independent living.
To provide caring and comprehensive health and supporting services, linking people experiencing homelessness to individual/collective solutions and to be a leader in creating service delivery models and solutions to homelessness.
Meals on Wheels of Odessa enables people to live with dignity by offering community support and sustenance through coordinated services and enable older adults to live in their own homes safely and independently as long as they are able.
To provide shelter, supervision, and counseling for children in crisis; to cooperate with other agencies in order to resolve problems related to the welfare of these children; to assist the families of these children in seeking possible…
Mesilla valley community of hope is a daytime service center for homeless people. it provides programs and intensive case management. it operates several housing programs to meet the people's emergency, transitional and permanent housing…
The children's advocacy center of van zandt county is committed to ensuring quality services and support to those children impacted by abuse while also building a future where no child in van zandt county experiences abuse.
Amarillo area casa advocates for abused and neglected children through support and training of court appointed volunteers
Established in 1934, vna helps older adults live with dignity and independence at home by providing in-home care, food and friendship for the ill, hungry, and homebound.
The WTFB exists to collect, purchase, and distribute food to feed the hungry in 19 counties in West Texas in partnership with volunteers and community organizations and to educate these partners and the public at large about the real face…
How this is measured
37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 116 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds ARLINGTON LIFE SHELTER ↗
- Who funds GRAND PRAIRIE UNITED CHARITES INC ↗
- Who funds BRIGHTER TOMORROWS INC ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS INC OF TARRANT COUNTY ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS ↗
- Who funds HOUSE OF HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds CHALLENGE UNLIMITED INC ↗
- Who funds OUACHITA COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds MARGUERITE'S PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S CRISIS CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE CALL ↗
- Who funds TABLE OF PLENTY IN CHELMSFORD INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY CRISIS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Impact Lufkin ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a loosely connected circle, clustered around a few shared anchors.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Southern New Mexico · Celanese Foundation · America's Charities · Binns Family Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Texas Instruments Foundation · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Bonnie Korlick Private Charitable Foundation · Ann L Rhodes and Carol Greene Rhodes · The Saab Family Foundation · Hoblitzelle Foundation · We Share A Common Thread Foundation Inc
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Lockheed Martin Employee Charity Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lockheed Martin Employee Charity Fund. Bigger dots raise more.
- Lowell Association for the Blind Inc: 49% of income from government
- House of Hope Inc: 1% of income from government
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Lockheed Martin Employee Charity Fund?
Find your warmest path to Lockheed Martin Employee Charity Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Lockheed Martin Employee Charity’s filings →