Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lockhart Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$394k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$36k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Animals$1.0MHuman Services$128kHousing & Shelter$60kFood & Nutrition$55kCrime & Legal$38kYouth Development$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k19 grants · $387k
$18,604
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BE KIND RESCUE DOGS FOUNDATION$36,000
LUPA LEGACY ANIMAL RESCUE$36,000
Individual grant recipient$30,000
SAVE OUR STRAYS INC$30,000
WITTY KITTY TNR INC$30,000
FREE TO LIVE ANIMAL SANCTUARY$25,000
OKLAHOMA HUMANE SOCIETY$25,000
TINY PAWS KITTEN RESCUE INC$25,000
HORSE FEATHERS EQUINE CENTER$20,000
HAPPY DOG FARM FOUNDATION$20,000
WE'RE OK FOUNDATION$18,604
PEPPERS RANCH INC$15,000
T-TOWN TNR$15,000
Individual grant recipient$11,000
ANIMAL RESCUE FOUNDATION OF BARTLESVILLE$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $117k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 53% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 13%HOUSE OF HEALING: $10k → 9%THE RIGHT PATH RIDING ACADEMY INC: $10k → 15%THE RIGHT PATH RIDING ACADEMY: $10k → 15%THE RIGHT PATH RIDING ACADEMY: $9k → 15%THE RIGHT PATH RIDING ACADEMY INC: $8k → 15%PEPPERS RANCH INC: $15k → 12%THE RIGHT PATH RIDING ACADEMY INC: $5k → 15%CITY CARE: $20k → 16%PEPPERS RANCH INC: $15k → 12%PEPPERS RANCH INC: $15k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 16 repeat orgs$326k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +17% since the first grant, against -5% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
16

Total granted

$1.1M
$173k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
-5%

Still filing today

69%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $153k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHuman ServicesCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NE
    NEXUS EQUINE INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $120k · revenue +731%
  • SO
    SAVE OUR STRAYS INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $103k · revenue +16% · 52% of their budget
  • OH
    OKLAHOMA HUMANE SOCIETY
    4× · 2022–2025 · $76k · revenue +547%

Funded once

  • BF
    BEST FRIENDS OF PETS INC
    one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue -100%
  • OW
    OKLAHOMA WESTIE RESCUE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue -1%
  • CC
    CITY CARE INC
    one grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hope Fur Paws Rescue

To help injured, abandoned and unwanted animals. We provide food, vet care that includes heartworm prevention and spay or neuter services, shelter and anything else needed.

Animals
2
Pets Without Partners

Find homes for homeless/abandoned dogs. Provide full vet car and housing while awaiting adoption,

Animals
3
Pug Rescue Owasso

Pug Rescue Owasso mission is to rescue abused, abandoned, homeless, unwanted , sick and injured pugs. we rehabilitate them medically and emotionally and place them into homes

Animals
4
Peppy Pet Rescue

rescue, rehabilitate, and rehome animals in need

Animals
5
Paws and Claws Animal Welfare Society Inc

Animal Rescue

Animals
6
Paws Animal Rescue Center

To help rescue unwanted pets

Animals
7
Runaways Animal Rescue
Animals
8
Shelters and Shelves Rescue Inc

foster based dog rescue working with shelters to save dogs

Animals
9
Purple Paws 2nd Chance Rescue
Animals
10
West Houston Animal Rescue

Rescue dogs and other small domestic animals, care for them until they are healthy and adopt them to loving families.

Animals
11
Muttsnstuff

Rescue animals

Animals
12
Phelps County Animal Rescue

provide shelter and care for dogs and cats

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Friends With Four Paws Inc; the most unlike its peers is Angel Fund Okc Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/25
Grantees still filing
10/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEXUS EQUINE INC: $120,000 · AnimalsNEXUS EQUINE INCSAVE OUR STRAYS INC: $103,000 · AnimalsSAVE OUR STRAYS INCOKLAHOMA HUMANE SOCIETY: $76,000 · AnimalsOKLAHOMA HUMANE SOCIETYTiny Paws Kitten Rescue Inc: $70,000 · AnimalsTiny Paws Kitten Rescue IncHORSE FEATHERS EQUINE CENTER INC: $67,025 · AnimalsHORSE FEATHERS EQUINE CENTER INCANIMAL RESCUE FOUNDATION: $58,225 · AnimalsANIMAL RESCUE FOUNDATIONT-TOWN TNR INC: $55,000 · AnimalsT-TOWN TNR INCPets and People Humane Society Inc: $55,000 · AnimalsPets and People Humane Society IncBE KIND RESCUE DOGS FOUNDATION: $36,000 · Animals+9 more: $92,604 · Animals+9 moreFREE TO LIVE ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $103,500 · OtherFREE TO LIVE ANIMAL SANCTUARYLUPA LEGACY ANIMAL RESCUE: $64,200 · OtherLUPA LEGACY ANIMAL RESCUEFRIENDS OF THE SHELTER: $60,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE SHELTERHAPPY DOG FARM FOUNDATION: $55,000 · OtherHAPPY DOG FARM FOUNDATION3 GIRLS ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $35,000 · Other3 GIRLS ANIMAL RESCUE INCWITTY KITTY TNR INC: $30,000 · OtherWITTY KITTY TNR INCIndividual grant recipient: $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBEST FRIENDS OF PETS INC: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $17,000 · Other+9 more: $70,500 · Other+9 morePEPPERS RANCH INC: $66,000 · Human ServicesPEPPERS RAN…THE RIGHT PATH RIDING ACADEMY INC: $41,500 · Human ServicesTHE RIGHT P…CITY CARE INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesCITY CARE I…House of Healing Inc: $10,000 · Human ServicesHouse of He…Pets Helping People Inc: $37,500 · Crime & Legal
Animals$732,854Other$485,200Human Services$137,500Crime & Legal$37,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEXUS EQUINE INC: $120,000 over 5y, 4.4% of budgetSAVE OUR STRAYS INC: $103,000 over 6y, 52% of budgetOKLAHOMA HUMANE SOCIETY: $76,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetTiny Paws Kitten Rescue Inc: $70,000 over 5y, 9.5% of budgetHORSE FEATHERS EQUINE CENTER INC: $67,025 over 5y, 20% of budgetPEPPERS RANCH INC: $66,000 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetANIMAL RESCUE FOUNDATION: $58,225 over 4y, 9.5% of budgetT-TOWN TNR INC: $55,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetPets and People Humane Society Inc: $55,000 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetTHE RIGHT PATH RIDING ACADEMY INC: $41,500 over 5y, 5.1% of budgetPets Helping People Inc: $37,500 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetBE KIND RESCUE DOGS FOUNDATION: $36,000 over 1y, 96% of budget3 GIRLS ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $35,000 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetBEST FRIENDS OF PETS INC: $20,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetOKLAHOMA WESTIE RESCUE FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetCITY CARE INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWE RE OK FOUNDATION: $18,604 over 1y, 20% of budgetMUTT MISFITS SOCIETY: $10,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetHouse of Healing Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetA NEW LEASH ON LIFE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 15% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEXUS EQUINE INC ↗
  • Who funds SAVE OUR STRAYS INC ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Tiny Paws Kitten Rescue Inc ↗
  • Who funds HORSE FEATHERS EQUINE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds PEPPERS RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL RESCUE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds T-TOWN TNR INC ↗
  • Who funds Pets and People Humane Society Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE RIGHT PATH RIDING ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds Pets Helping People Inc ↗
  • Who funds BE KIND RESCUE DOGS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds 3 GIRLS ANIMAL RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds BEST FRIENDS OF PETS INC ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA WESTIE RESCUE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CITY CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds WE RE OK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PETS WITHOUT PARENTS INC ↗
  • Who funds MUTT MISFITS SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE OF OKEMAH ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS WITH FOUR PAWS INC ↗
  • Who funds House of Healing Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNDERDOGS RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds A NEW LEASH ON LIFE INC ↗
  • Who funds Angel Fund Okc Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kirkpatrick Foundation IncOK30× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kirkpatrick Foundation Inc · Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · American Fidelity Foundation · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Leslie L Alexander Foundation Inc · Arnall Family Foundation · Fred Jones Family Foundation · Love Meyer Family Foundation · The Magnolia Charitable Foundation · BISSELL Pet Foundation · Pedigree Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lockhart Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lockhart Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 180%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    18get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Lockhart Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Lockhart Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lockhart’s filings →

    More from the funding graph