· Private foundation
Little Denmark Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k5 grants · $23k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $106k
- $250k+1 grant · $300k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DALLAS 1ST WARD-CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS | $300,000 |
| CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS | $106,000 |
| WUES PARENT TEACHER ORGANIZATION INC | $5,000 |
| COMMUNITY AUTISM RESOURCES & EDUCATION | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| DFW ALLIANCE FOR RELIGIOUS FREEDOM | $5,000 |
| KIDS'MEALS INC | $3,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +106% since the first grant, against +72% for the ones you funded once.
10 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 29% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $305k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CACOMMUNITY AUTISM RESOURCES & EDUCATION3× · 2021–2024 · $30k · revenue +306%
- CWCOWBOYS WITH A MISSION2× · 2020–2022 · $14k · revenue +49%
- KMKIDS' MEALS INC2× · 2020–2024 · $8k · revenue +106%
Funded once
- UVUTAH VALLEY UNIVERSITYone grant, 2019 · $67k
- LPLDS PHILANTHROPIES - BYU PATHWAYS WORLDWIDEone grant, 2018 · $55k
- MRMEETEETSE RECREATION DISTRICTone grant, 2021 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Christian pre-school from age 3-months to school-age, and school from
The HISD Foundation is dedicated to mobilizing the local community to support innovative priorities in HISD to improve outcomes for all students in the district. Our mission is to fund projects and programs of merit that fall outside of…
As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.
The Cambridge School of Dallas was formed in 2001 and is a college preparatory, non-denominational christian school established for the purpose of providing academic excellence in a christ-centered environment.
Pet education, assistance and rescue program statewide (texas)
Hmm health provides quality healthcare to all its neighbors with love, compassion, and respect.
Advocate for the constitutionally protected freedom to choose where and how their children are educated and to further the common good and general welfare by empowering Texan families with the legal right to choose the best school for…
RAISE Texas advances equitable policies and programs that foster financial security and economic mobility for low- and moderate-income Texans. We equip, innovate and advocate to reduce disparities, remove barriers and build opportunities…
Through faith in action, austin habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.
Leadership austin connects and develops leaders to courageously engage and transform our communities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kids' Meals Inc and the most unlike its peers is Community Autism Resources & Education. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COMMUNITY AUTISM RESOURCES & EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds COWBOYS WITH A MISSION ↗
- Who funds PATHWAY CENTRE FOR MENTALLY & PHYSICALLY HANDICAPPED CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds 29 ACRES INC ↗
- Who funds KIDS' MEALS INC ↗
- Who funds OPERATION KINDNESS ↗
- Who funds WUES PARENT TEACHER ORGANIZATION INC ↗
- Who funds HOPE MEDIA GROUP ↗
- Who funds AGAPE CLINIC ↗
- Who funds TEXAS WOMANS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds The Rachel Covey Foundation ↗
- Who funds ASCENDIGO AUTISM SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds Passion for Childrens Inc ↗
- Who funds LA FIESTA DE LAS SEIS BANDERAS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Texas Instruments Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Little Denmark Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.