Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lisa McGraw Figure Skating Fdn

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$361k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Recreation & Sports$1.5MArts & Culture$813kYouth Development$390kEducation$15k
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $180k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $174k
$30,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$6.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEW ENGLAND AMATEUR SKATING FOUNDATION$60,000
ICE THEATRE OF NEW YORK$58,750
FIGURE SKATING IN HARLEM INC$55,000
US FIGURE SKATING ASSN$40,000
ICE DANCE INTERNATIONAL$35,000
THE NEXT ICE AGE$30,000
PROFESSIONAL SKATERS FOUNDATION$25,000
PHILADELPHIA SKATING CLUB & HUMANE SOC$25,000
AMERICAN ICE THEATRE$15,000
PRINCETON SKATING CLUB$10,000
SUN VALLEY FIGURE SKATING CLUB INC$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 55% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE SKATING CLUB OF BOSTON: $150k → 16%PROFESSIONAL SKATERS FOUNDATION: $50k → 9%PHILADELPHIA SKATING CLUB & HUMANE SOC: $25k → 10%ICE THEATRE OF NEW YORK: $59k → 17%UNITED STATES FIGURE SKATING ASSN: $60k → 9%SKATER'S FUND INC: $25k → 11%THE NEXT ICE AGE: $30k → 6%THE NEXT ICE AGE: $25k → 11%THE NEXT ICE AGE: $30k → 19%ICE DANCE INTERNATIONAL: $35k → 9%PROFESSIONAL SKATERS FOUNDATION: $30k → 9%ICE THEATRE OF NEW YORK: $43k → 17%UNITED STATES FIGURE SKATING FOUNDATION: $30k → 9%THE NEXT ICE AGE: $30k → 6%THE NEXT ICE AGE: $30k → 19%ICE DANCE INTERNATIONAL: $30k → 9%PROFESSIONAL SKATERS FOUNDATION: $25k → 9%ICE THEATER OF NEW YORK: $41k → 17%US FIGURE SKATING: $72k → 9%THE NEXT ICE AGE: $30k → 6%ICE DANCE INTERNATIONAL: $30k → 9%PROFESSIONAL SKATERS FOUNDATION: $25k → 9%ICE THEATRE OF NEW YORK: $40k → 17%UNITED STATES FIGURE SKATING ASSN: $50k → 9%THE NEXT ICE AGE: $30k → 6%ICE DANCE INTERNATIONAL: $25k → 9%PROFESSIONAL SKATERS FOUNDATION: $25k → 9%ICE THEATRE OF NEW YORK: $40k → 17%US FIGURE SKATING ASSN: $40k → 9%THE NEXT ICE AGE: $30k → 6%ICE DANCE INTERNATIONAL: $25k → 9%PROFESSIONAL SKATERS FOUNDATION: $25k → 9%ICE THEATRE OF NEW YORK: $40k → 17%US FIGURE SKATING ASSN: $40k → 9%ICE DANCE INTERNATIONAL: $25k → 9%ICE THEATRE OF NEW YORK: $30k → 17%UNITED STATES FIGURE SKATING ASSN: $30k → 9%ICE DANCE INTERNATIONAL: $25k → 9%ICE THEATRE OF NEW YORK: $30k → 17%UNITED STATES FIGURE SKATING ASSN: $30k → 9%FIGURE SKATING IN HARLEM INC: $55k → 17%FIGURE SKATING IN HARLEM INC: $50k → 17%FIGURE SKATING IN HARLEM INC: $50k → 17%FIGURE SKATING IN HARLEM INC: $50k → 17%FIGURE SKATING IN HARLEM INC: $50k → 17%FIGURE SKATING IN HARLEM INC: $45k → 17%FIGURE SKATING IN HARLEM INC: $45k → 17%FIGURE SKATING IN HARLEM INC: $45k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
ID
MT
MN
NY
MA
PA
NJ
RI
UT
CO
MD
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.5M · 15 repeat orgs$141k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against -7% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
5

Total granted

$2.5M
$116k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
-7%

Still filing today

80%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Recreation & SportsArts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FS
    FIGURE SKATING IN HARLEM INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $390k · revenue +31%
  • US
    UNITED STATES FIGURE SKATING ASSOCIATION
    7× · 2017–2024 · $322k · revenue +64%
  • IT
    ICE THEATRE OF NEW YORK
    7× · 2018–2024 · $281k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • IT
    ICE THEATER OF NEW YORK
    one grant, 2017 · $41k
  • US
    UNITED STATES FIGURE SKATING FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $30k · revenue -10%
  • SF
    SKATER'S FUND INC
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lisa Mcgraw Figure Skating Fdn
Philanthropy
2
Aspen Figure Skating Club

Skating instruction for adults and children

Recreation & Sports
3
Heartland Figure Skating Club

Professional skaters association

—
4
Fort Wayne Ice Skating Club Inc
Recreation & Sports
5
St Louis Skating Club Inc

To promote the sport of amateur figure skating in St. Louis Missouri; to function as an amateur athletic association to foster national and local competition in the sport of figure skating; to encourage and give guidance for the full…

Recreation & Sports
6
Fort Collins Figure Skating Club
Recreation & Sports
7
San Diego Figure Skating Club

To foster,promote,encourage,advance and improve the art of and interest in ice skating; and to encourage and to cultivate a spirit of harmony and friendship among ice skaters by such means as may be proposed from time to time by our…

—
8
Portland Ice Skating Club

As a United States Figure Skating member club, we provide opportunities and resources to promote figure skating in the Portland metro area.

Recreation & Sports
9
North Atlantic Figure Skating Club

Providing figure skating instruction, certification, and ice rental time to members

Recreation & Sports
10
New England Skating Club Inc

To meet the needs of amateur figure skaters of all ages and abilities by offering opportunities for instruction, practice and advancement in figure skating. This organization is a member of U.S. Figure Skating and will function in…

Recreation & Sports
11
The Skating Club of San Francisco Inc

Dedicated to the promotion of the sport of figure skating

Recreation & Sports
12
Ice House Skating Academy

Encourage instruction, practice, and advancement of figure skating.

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Philadelphia Skating Club & Humane Socie Ty; the most unlike its peers is Princeton Day School Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEW ENGLAND AMATEUR SKATING FOUNDATION INC: $365,000 · OtherNEW ENGLAND AMATEUR SKATING FOUNDATION INCUNITED STATES FIGURE SKATING ASSOCIATION: $322,000 · OtherUNITED STATES FIGURE SKATING ASSOCIATIONICE THEATRE OF NEW YORK: $281,250 · OtherICE THEATRE OF NEW YORKTHE NEXT ICE AGE INC: $235,000 · OtherTHE NEXT ICE AGE INCPROFESSIONAL SKATERS FOUNDATION: $180,000 · OtherPROFESSIONAL SKATERS FOUNDATIONNEW ENGLAND AMATEUR SKATING: $140,000 · OtherNEW ENGLAND AMATEUR SKATINGPRINCETON SKATING CLUB: $80,000 · OtherSUN VALLEY FIGURE SKATING CLUB INC: $62,500 · Other+5 more: $140,500 · Other+5 moreFIGURE SKATING IN HARLEM INC: $390,000 · Recreation & SportsFIGURE SKATING IN HARLEM I…THE SKATING CLUB OF BOSTON: $165,000 · Recreation & SportsTHE SKATING CLUB OF BOSTONUNITED STATES FIGURE SKATING FOUNDATION: $30,000 · Recreation & SportsPHILADELPHIA SKATING CLUB & HUMANE SOCIE TY: $25,000 · Recreation & Sports+1 more: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsICE DANCE INTERNATIONAL: $220,000 · Arts & CultureICE DANCE…THE LAKE PLACID ASSOCIATION FOR MUSIC DRAMA AND ART INC: $16,081 · Arts & CultureTHE LAKE …PRINCETON DAY SCHOOL INC: $15,000 · Education
Other$1,806,250Recreation & Sports$620,000Arts & Culture$236,081Education$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFIGURE SKATING IN HARLEM INC: $390,000 over 8y, 2.2% of budgetNEW ENGLAND AMATEUR SKATING FOUNDATION INC: $365,000 over 6y, 19% of budgetUNITED STATES FIGURE SKATING ASSOCIATION: $322,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetICE THEATRE OF NEW YORK: $281,250 over 7y, 9.7% of budgetTHE NEXT ICE AGE INC: $235,000 over 8y, 36% of budgetICE DANCE INTERNATIONAL: $220,000 over 8y, 15% of budgetPROFESSIONAL SKATERS FOUNDATION: $180,000 over 6y, 84% of budgetTHE SKATING CLUB OF BOSTON: $165,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetPRINCETON SKATING CLUB: $80,000 over 8y, 80% of budgetSUN VALLEY FIGURE SKATING CLUB INC: $62,500 over 8y, 13% of budgetUNITED STATES FIGURE SKATING FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetPHILADELPHIA SKATING CLUB & HUMANE SOCIE TY: $25,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetTHE LAKE PLACID ASSOCIATION FOR MUSIC DRAMA AND ART INC: $16,081 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetPRINCETON DAY SCHOOL INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWHITEFISH SPORTS FACILITIES FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FIGURE SKATING IN HARLEM INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW ENGLAND AMATEUR SKATING FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FIGURE SKATING ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds ICE THEATRE OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds THE NEXT ICE AGE INC ↗
  • Who funds ICE DANCE INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds PROFESSIONAL SKATERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE SKATING CLUB OF BOSTON ↗
  • Who funds PRINCETON SKATING CLUB ↗
  • Who funds SUN VALLEY FIGURE SKATING CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FIGURE SKATING FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PHILADELPHIA SKATING CLUB & HUMANE SOCIE TY ↗
  • Who funds THE LAKE PLACID ASSOCIATION FOR MUSIC DRAMA AND ART INC ↗
  • Who funds PRINCETON DAY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds WHITEFISH SPORTS FACILITIES FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN6.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lisa McGraw Figure Skating Fdn funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lisa McGraw Figure Skating Fdn. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    5get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Lisa McGraw Figure Skating Fdn?

    Find your warmest path to Lisa McGraw Figure Skating Fdn through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lisa McGraw Figure Skating Fdn’s filings →

    More from the funding graph