Skip to content
Lipkin Family Foundation Co Valley National at a glance

· Private foundation

Lipkin Family Foundation Co Valley National

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$112k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$468kPhilanthropy$109kEducation$58kReligion$44kCivil Rights$11kInternational$9kHuman Services$5kRecreation & Sports$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $30k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$2,976
Median grant
4
States reached
$513k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center$50,000
JUPITER MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$30,000
CURE BREAST CANCER$7,000
TEMPLE BNAI JESHURUN$6,080
ISRAEL LACROSSE ASSOCIATION INC$5,000
ADMIRALS COVE FOUNDATION$5,000
PINE BROOK JEWISH CENTER$2,976
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$1,800
Cooperman Barnabas Medical Center$1,200
LILYS HOPE FOUNDATION$1,040
THE LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY$1,000
LUPUS RESEARCH ALLIANCE$500
SPARK$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 78% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LILYS HOPE FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%Green Vision Inc: $300 → 4%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CA
VA
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$662k · 19 repeat orgs$78k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against +38% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
21

Total granted

$662k
$39k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+38%

Still filing today

47%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $39k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesInternationalArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    ADMIRALS COVE FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2018–2024 · $85k · revenue +197%
  • TC
    TIKVA CORP
    2× · 2017–2018 · $4k · revenue +51%
  • CA
    CHARCOT-MARIE-TOOTH ASSOCIATION
    6× · 2017–2022 · $2k · revenue +119%

Funded once

  • SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $6k · revenue +51%
  • CF
    Co-Op for Assist & Relief Everywhere
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEEgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +44%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
2
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
3
Long Island Jewish Medical Center

Long island jewish medical center is part of the northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and…

Health
4
Chelsea Jewish Lifecare Inc

The organization's mission is to manage a continuum of senior care business lines that consistently provide high-quality compassionate care while focusing on the development of innovative programs and services that enable individuals to…

Health
5
The Lieber Institute Inc

The mission of the institute is to translate basic genetic and molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia and related developmental brain disorders into clinical advances that change the lives of affected individuals. it is catalyzing a new…

Health
6
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
American Society for Technion Israel Institute of Technology Inc

The american technion society supports the technion's critical research and (continued on sch o)

International
8
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
9
Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

—
10
International Biomedical Research Alliance

Our mission is to invest in and accelerate the development of the most promising future leaders in biomedical research with global impact.

Health
11
The Israel Innovation Fund Inc

Our vision is to reignite the zionist spirit and meet the needs of jewish civilization in the twenty-first century by connecting people around the world through the vibrancy and creativity of contemporary israeli culture.

Arts & Culture
12
Minneapolis Jewish Federation

Minneapolis jewish federation is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of philanthropy, leverages resources to meet local and global jewish needs, and facilitates community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Greater Metrowest Nj; the most unlike its peers is Israel Lacrosse Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/31
Grantees still filing
21/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center: $355,600 · OtherMemorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer CenterIndividual grant recipient: $42,665 · OtherIndividual grant recipientRUTGERS UNIVERSITY FDTN: $40,000 · OtherRUTGERS UNIVERSITY FDTNCURE BREAST CANCER: $31,000 · OtherCURE BREAST CANCERPINE BROOK JEWISH CENTER: $24,233 · Other+20 more: $58,455 · Other+20 moreADMIRALS COVE FOUNDATION INC: $85,000 · PhilanthropyADMIRALS COVE FOUNDA…Jupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc: $30,000 · PhilanthropyJupiter Medical Cent…JEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $14,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF…JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER METROWEST NJ: $9,250 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF…+1 more: $300 · PhilanthropyCURE BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $35,800 · HealthKLEINE-LEVIN SYNDROME FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 · HealthCHARCOT-MARIE-TOOTH ASSOCIATION: $2,300 · HealthGLOBAL LYME ALLIANCE INC: $2,000 · Health+5 more: $4,050 · HealthTIKVA CORP: $4,400 · EducationSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $2,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $1,800 · EducationALUMNI ASSOCIATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $900 · EducationSPARKS FOUNDATION INC: $850 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $500 · EducationSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $6,000 · Arts & CultureISRAEL LACROSSE ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $5,000 · Civil Rights
Other$551,953Philanthropy$138,550Health$47,150Education$10,450Arts & Culture$6,000Recreation & Sports$5,000Civil Rights$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetADMIRALS COVE FOUNDATION INC: $85,000 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetCURE BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $35,800 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetJupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $14,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER METROWEST NJ: $9,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL LACROSSE ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTIKVA CORP: $4,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKLEINE-LEVIN SYNDROME FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD ALLERGY RESEARCH & EDUCATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHARCOT-MARIE-TOOTH ASSOCIATION: $2,300 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL LYME ALLIANCE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLUPUS RESEARCH ALLIANCE INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPets are Wonderful Support Inc dba PAWS: $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPARKS FOUNDATION INC: $850 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS HILLEL FOUNDATION: $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREEN VISION INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S NATIONAL: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMONTVILLE TOWNSHIP FIRST AID SQUAD INC: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Goldman Sachs Cha…Gs Donor Advised Phil…National Philanthropi…Jewish Communal FundMorgan Stanley Global…The Pfizer Foundation…Vanguard Charitable E…American Endowment Fo…The Bank of America C…Network for GoodDonor Advised Charita…American Online Givin…
The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift FundNY12.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Jewish Communal Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lipkin Family Foundation Co Valley National funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lipkin Family Foundation Co Valley National. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    9get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lipkin Family Foundation Co Valley National’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home