Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lin & Loveall Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$31k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$147kEnvironment$55kReligion$50kCommunity Improvement$16kEducation$12kArts & Culture$9kInternational$8kPublic Benefit$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $18k
$9,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$6k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GARDEN OF HOPE$18,200
QUEENS BOTANICAL GARDENS$9,500
CHINESE CHRISTIAN HERALD CRUSADES INC$2,000
LIFT UP THE VULNERABLE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHINESE CHRISTIAN HERALD CRUSADES INC: $4k → 17%CHINESE CHRISTIAN HERALD CRUSADES INC: $2k → 17%CHINESE CHRISTIAN HERALD CRUSADES INC: $2k → 17%CHINESE CHRISTIAN HERALD CRUSADES INC: $2k → 17%CHINESE CHRISTIAN HERALD CRUSADES INC: $2k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$308k · 11 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
5

Total granted

$308k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+163%

Still filing today

45%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesArts & CultureInternationalEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GO
    GARDEN OF HOPE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $147k · revenue +177%
  • FC
    FLUSHING COUNCIL ON CULTURE AND THE ARTS
    8× · 2017–2024 · $6k · revenue +37%
  • LU
    LIFT UP THE VULNERABLE INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $2k · revenue +45%

Funded once

  • LS
    LARRAINE SEGIL SCHOLARS FOUNDATIONgraduated
    7× · 2018–2024 · $12k · revenue +398%
  • MW
    MAKE WAY PARTNERS INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2k · revenue -74%
  • GN
    GREATER NY COUNCILS
    4× · 2017–2020 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Women's Refugee Commission Inc

To improve the lives and protect the rights of women, children and youth displaced by conflict and crisis. the women's refugee commission envisions a world in which refugees are safe, healthy and reliant and seeks to drive change in…

Human Services
2
Women in Global Health Inc

Women in global health (wgh) is a global movement and organization that brings together all genders and backgrounds to achieve gender equality in global health leadership.

Public Benefit
3
Women's Project & Productions Inc

Wp theater is the nation's oldest and largest theater company dedicated to developing, producing, and promoting the work of women+ at every stage of their careers. for over four decades we have served as leaders of a global movement…

Arts & Culture
4
The Population Council Inc

We generate ideas, produce evidence, and design solutions to improve the lives of underserved populations around the world. we take a multidisciplinary, intergenerational, life-cycle approach that contributes to (see schedule o)four global…

International
5
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
6
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
7
Women's Rights Without Frontiers International

Women's rights without frontiers, international ("wrwf- or "the organization") is a nonprofit entity supporting the rights of women and girls, first in china, then in other countries' communities. the organization was founded by regina…

International
8
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
9
Justice Innovation Inc

The center for justice innovation is a non-profit organization that works to create a fair, effective, and humane justice system and build strong, thriving communities.

Crime & Legal
10
Committee to Protect Journalists Inc

The committee to protect journalists promotes press freedom worldwide and defends the right of journalists to report the news safely and without fear of reprisal. cpj ensures the free flow of news and commentary by taking action wherever…

Civil Rights
11
Washington Office On Latin America

To advance human rights and social justice in the americas.

International
12
Project Hope - the People-to-People Health Foundation Inc

To conduct and support programs and activities aimed at solving some of the world's greatest public health challenges, with a specific focus on enabling health workers to have the greatest possible impact on the health of the people they…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is City Futures Inc; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
12/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GARDEN OF HOPE INC: $146,950 · Human ServicesGARDEN OF HOPE INCCHINESE CHRISTIAN HERALD CRUSADES INC: $12,000 · Human ServicesCHINESE CHRISTIAN HERALD CRUSADES INCQUEENS BOTANICAL GARDENS: $55,120 · OtherQUEENS BOTANICAL GARDENSCHRISTIAN TESTIMONY MISSION INC: $38,000 · OtherCHRISTIAN TESTIMONY MISSION INCIndividual grant recipient: $28,160 · OtherIndividual grant recipientQEDC (QUEENS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP: $16,000 · OtherQEDC (QUEENS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP+5 more: $4,950 · OtherLARRAINE SEGIL SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $11,500 · EducationFLUSHING COUNCIL ON CULTURE AND THE ARTS: $6,000 · Arts & CultureTHE PHILHARMONIC SYMPHONY SOCIETY OF NY INC: $2,000 · Arts & CultureWORLD VISION INC: $3,000 · InternationalLIFT UP THE VULNERABLE INC: $2,000 · InternationalWORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS: $1,000 · International
Human Services$158,950Other$142,230Education$11,500Arts & Culture$8,000International$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGARDEN OF HOPE INC: $146,950 over 8y, 3.4% of budgetCHINESE CHRISTIAN HERALD CRUSADES INC: $12,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLARRAINE SEGIL SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $11,500 over 7y, 4.5% of budgetFLUSHING COUNCIL ON CULTURE AND THE ARTS: $6,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $3,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLIFT UP THE VULNERABLE INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PHILHARMONIC SYMPHONY SOCIETY OF NY INC: $2,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE WAY PARTNERS INC: $2,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS: $1,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GARDEN OF HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds CHINESE CHRISTIAN HERALD CRUSADES INC ↗
  • Who funds LARRAINE SEGIL SCHOLARS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FLUSHING COUNCIL ON CULTURE AND THE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFT UP THE VULNERABLE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE PHILHARMONIC SYMPHONY SOCIETY OF NY INC ↗
  • Who funds MAKE WAY PARTNERS INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY10.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lin & Loveall Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lin & Loveall Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 67%
  • World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals: 67% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lin & Loveall’s filings →

More from the funding graph